Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct;8(10):62–70. doi: 10.1080/15265160802478404

Table 4.

Importance of Knowing and Preference for Notification Versus Permission in Anonymous and Identifiable Scenarios1,2

Importance of knowing that genetic research is being done with samples in identifiable versus anonymous scenarios
Preference for notification versus permission by those who want to know that research is being done with samples
Independent variables (with coding) Not important to know in both (0) versus important to know in both (1) n = 684 Not important to know in both (0)versus important to know only when identifiable (1) n = 261 Anonymous:notification (0) versus permission (1) n = 648 Identifiable:notification (0) versus permission (1)n = 748
Age (years)
 1 18–29 ∏ 5 ≥ 65 .73 (.58–.91) .89 (.68–1.15) .87 (.75–1.02) .75 (.65–.87)
Gender
 1 Male ∏ 2 Female 1.41 (.88–2.26) .88 (.50–1.54) 1.19 (.80–1.76) 1.32 (.94–1.87)
Education
 1 < High school ∏ 5 Beyond college 1.01 (.82–1.26) 1.06 (.83–1.35) 1.69 (1.42–2.01) 1.55 (1.33–1.82)
Race
 1 White ∏ 2 Black 1.68 (.74–3.82) 1.12 (.43–2.96) 1.91 (1.14–3.20) .92 (.57–1.47)
Income
 1 <$20,000 ∏ 5 > $80,000+ .78 (.65–.93) .87 (.70–1.07) 1.02 (.88–1.17) .93 (.82–1.05)
Religiosity
 1 Not religious ∏ 2 Religious 1.21 (.67–2.20) 1.01 (.50–2.04) .52 (.30–.89) 1.11 (.71–.172)
Health status
 1 Poor ∏5 Excellent 1.06 (.85–1.33) 1.16 (.89–1.52) 1.23 (1.03–1.48) 1.10 (.92–1.26)
Chronic condition
 1 No ∏2 Yes 1.10 (.64–1.87) 1.24 (.66–2.34) 1.21 (.78–1.87) 1.02 (.69–1.50)
Surgery
 1 No ∏2 Yes 1.81 (.99–3.29) 1.65 (.78–3.40) 1.12 (.70–1.81) 1.25 (.82–1.91)
How private
 1 Very private ∏5 Very open .69 (.56–.83) .68 (.54–.86) .84 (.72–.98) .89 (.77–1.02)
Trust in researchers
 1 Little/Not at all ∏ 3 Completely .68 (.44–1.05) .57 (.33–.96) .40 (.29–.56) .46 (.34–.63)
1

Reported as odds ratio (95% confidence interval).

2

Statistically significant values are indicated in bold.