. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 4.

Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Behav. 2013 Mar;37(2):277–282. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.37.2.15

Table 2.

Relation of Self-selection and Walkability to Log Transformed MET-minutes/week of Walking^a ^b (N=240)

	Walking for Transportation (R² = .097)			Walking for Leisure (R² = .052)			Total Walking (R² = .133)
	B (95% CI)	β	p	B (95% CI)	β	p	B (95% CI)	β	p
Intercept	3.87 (3.38, 4.36)	-	-	4.78 (4.24, 5.32)	-	-	4.97 (4.54, 5.40)	-	-
Walkability Index	0.87 (0.10, 1.65)	.15	.027	0.17 (−0.68, 1.01)	.03	.698	0.55 (−0.13, 1.23)	.10	.112
Neighborhood Selection	1.23 (0.47, 1.98)	.21	.002	0.34 (−0.49, 1.17)	.05	.423	1.18 (0.51, 1.85)	.22	.001
Neighborhood Preference	−0.28 (−1.02, 0.46)	-.05	.461	0.83 (0.02, 1.64)	.13	.045	0.05 (−0.60, 0.70)	.01	.885
Walkability X Selection Interaction	−0.62 (−2.13, 0.90)	-.05	.423	0.54 (−1.12, 2.19)	.04	.523	−0.17 (−1.50, 1.16)	-.02	.799
Walkability X Preference Interaction	0.28 (−1.20, 1.77)	.02	.709	−0.43 (−2.05, 1.19)	-.03	.602	−1.25 (−2.56, 0.05)	-.12	.059

Note.

B unstandardized coefficient

CI confidence interval

β standardized coefficient

The walking outcome variables were log transformed

Adjusted for age, BMI, education, and ethnicity