Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Promot. 2014 Apr 10;29(5):e188–e202. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130731-QUAN-398

Table 1.

Psychometric properties of measures

Domain Name of Measure Number of
Items and
Range
Cronbach’s
alpha
Mean SD Factorial Validity
(single construct-
unmodified)
Factorial Validity
(single construct-
modified)
Factorial Validity
(multiple
constructs within
a domain)
Context Project capacity. Project has the
resources it needs to meet its aims
6 modified;
7 original
(1-5)
0.78 4.34 0.52 χ2(14) = 89.35, p
< .001; CFI = .91,
TLI = .87, SRMR
= .03
χ2(9) = 20.88, p
= .013, CFI = .96,
TLI = .93, SRMR
= .03
N/A
Initial trust. Level of trust at the
beginning of the partnership
1 (1-7) N/A 5.21 1.26 N/A N/A
Structural/
Individual
Dynamics
Bridging social capital. Academic
and community partners have the
skills and cultural knowledge to
interact effectively
3 (1-5) 0.69 4.16 0.70 Saturated model Not modified χ2(84) = 206.27, p
< .001, CFI = .97,
TLI = .96, SRMR
= .03
Alignment with CBPR principles:
Partner focus. Develops individual
partner capacity and equitable
partnerships in all phases of the
research
4 (1-5) 0.82 4.51 0.59 χ2(2) = 0.65, p = .724,
CFI = 1.0, TLI = 1.0,
SRMR = .003
Not modified
Alignment with CBPR principles:
Community focus. Builds on
resources and strengths of the
community for the well-being of the
community
4 (1-5) 0.85 4.30 0.67 χ2(2) = 3.58, p = .167,
CFI = .99, TLI = .99,
SRMR =.01
Not modified
Core values. Shared understanding of
the project mission, priorities, and
strategies
4 (1-5) 0.89 4.41 0.60 χ2(2) = 27.77, p
< .001, CFI = .98,
TLI = .93, SRMR
= .01
Not modified
Relational
Dynamics
Task roles and communication:
Background research. Community
partners' level of involvement in the
background research
5 (1-3) 0.81 2.07 0.57 χ2(5) = 35.49, p
< .001, CFI = .96,
TLI = .91, SRMR
=.02
Not modified χ2(51) = 93.12, p
< .001, CFI = .95,
TLI = .93, SRMR
= .03
Task roles and communication:
Data collection. Community
partners’ level of involvement in the
data collection
4 (1-3) 0.69 2.50 0.51 χ2(2) = 11.61, p
= .003, CFI = .97,
TLI = .90, SRMR
= .02
Not modified
Task roles and communication:
Analysis & Dissemination.
Community partners' level of
involvement in data analysis and
dissemination of findings
3 modified;
4 original
(1-3)
0.82 2.07 0.71 χ2(2) = 60.89, p
< .001, CFI = .92,
TLI = .77, SRMR
= .03
Saturated model
Dialogue and mutual learning:
Participation. Degree to which all
partners participate in the process
3 (1-5) 0.78 4.44 0.58 Saturated model Not modified χ2(59) = 160.48, p
< .001, CFI = .97,
TLI = .96, SRMR
= .03
Dialogue and mutual learning:
Cooperation. Degree to which
partners cooperate to resolve
disagreements
3 (1-5) 0.83 4.15 0.68 Saturated model Not modified
Dialogue and mutual learning:
Respect. Degree to which partners
convey respect to each other (low
score equals higher respect)
3 (1-5) 0.83 1.74 0.89 Saturated model Not modified
Trust. Degree of current trust within
the partnership
4 (1-5) 0.86 4.36 0.63 χ2(2) = 8.80, p = .012,
CFI = .99, TLI = .98,
SRMR = .01
Not modified
Influence and power dynamics.
Degree of voice and influence in the
decision making
3 (1-5) 0.58 3.79 0.71 Saturated model Saturated model χ2(13) = 41.35, p
< .001, CFI = .96,
TLI = .93, SRMR
= .04
Participatory decision making.
Degree to which decisions are made
in a participatory manner
4 modified;
5 original
(1-5)
0.83 4.03 0.62 χ2(5) = 116.01, p
< .001, CFI = .89,
TLI = .78, SRMR
= .05
χ2(2) = 12.63, p
= .002, CFI = .97,
TLI = .92, SRMR
= .02
Leadership. Overall effectiveness of
project's leadership
10
modified;
12 original
(1-5)
0.94 4.28 0.61 χ2(54) = 455.78, p
< .001, CFI = .91,
TLI = .89, SRMR
= .03
χ2(35) = 139.84, p
< .001, CFI = .94,
TLI = .92, SRMR
= .03
χ2(64) = 171.09, p
< .001, CFI = .95,
TLI = .94, SRMR
= .02
Stewardship. Effective
use of financial & in-kind resources
3 (1-5) 0.86 4.36 0.65 Saturated model Not modified
Intervention/
Research
Partnership synergy. Partners ability
to develop goals, recognize
challenges, respond to needs, and
work together
5 (1-5) 0.90 4.46 0.59 χ2(5) = 33.27, p <
001, CFI = .98, TLI
= .96, SRMR = .01
Not modified N/A
Outcome Systems and capacity changes:
Partner capacity building. Develops
the skills to benefit the individual
members
3 modified;
4 original
(1-5)
0.80 3.42 0.99 χ2(2) = 6.45, p = .040,
CFI = .99, TLI = .98,
SRMR = .02
Saturated model χ2(125) = 255.59, p
< .001, CFI = .93,
TLI = .92, SRMR
= .07
Systems and capacity changes:
Agency capacity building. Develops
the reputation and skills of agencies
involved in the partnership
3 modified;
4 original
(1-5)
0.87 3.54 0.96 χ2(2) = 18.83, p
< .001, CFI = .98,
TLI = .94, SRMR
= .04
Saturated model
Systems and capacity changes:
Changes in power relations. Degree
to which power and capacity has been
developed in the community
members
5 (1-5) 0.81 4.17 0.60 χ2(5) = 12.74, p
= .026, CFI = .99,
TLI = .98, SRMR
= .01
Not modified
Systems and capacity changes:
Sustainability of
partnership/project. Likelihood of
the project and partnership continuing
beyond the funding period
3 (1-5) 0.71 4.00 0.76 Saturated model Not modified
Health outcomes: Community
transformation. Policy changes and
community improvement.
4 modified;
7 original
(1-5)
0.79 2.92 1.00 χ2(14) = 122.08, p
< .001, CFI = .92,
TLI = .87, SRMR
= .09
χ2(2) = 7.37, p = .025,
CFI = .98, TLI = .95,
SRMR = .06
Health outcomes: Community
health improvement. Improvement
of health for the community as a
result of the project
1 (1-5) N/A 3.63 1.02 N/A N/A