Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 21;266:217–224. doi: 10.1007/s00406-015-0655-4

Table 2.

Summarised data on the confounding variables analysis between suicide victims (n = 27) and control subjects (n = 30)

Sex Age (year) PMI (h) BAC (g/l)
Intergroup comparisons
 Suicide victims: ratio/median (q, q3) 23 m/4f 43 (28, 53) 24 (24, 48) 0.0 (0.0, 2.1)
 Controls: ratio/median (q1, q3) 11 m/19f 48 (39, 61) 24 (24, 48) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Statistics (suicide victims versus Controls)
 Test χ 2 test U U U
 Characteristic value χ 2 = 13.90 Z = 1.886 Z = − 0.280 Z = 1.846
 P value 0.0002 0.059 0.780 0.065
AgNOR parameters Group Age PMI BAC
Correlation analysis between numerical confounding variables listed above and AgNOR parameters revealing significant intergroup differences
AgNOR area S r/P 0.16/0.42 −0.05/0.80 0.06/0.77
C r/P 0.11/0.57 −0.20/0.28 0.18/0.33
Relative AgNOR area S r/P −0.14/0.47 0.08/0.70 0.28/0.16
C r/P 0.09/0.62 −0.04/0.85 −0.01/0.97

f female, m male, q1 and q3 quartile 1 and 3, PMI post-mortem interval, BAC blood alcohol concentration, S suicide victims, C controls, r correlation coefficient and P P value of the Spearman’s correlation, PMI post-mortem interval, BAC blood alcohol concentration