Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Taylor & Francis Open Select logoLink to Taylor & Francis Open Select
. 2015 Dec 26;19(2):151–161. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2015.1124259

Treating vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause: how important is vaginal lubricant and moisturizer composition?

D Edwards a,*, N Panay b
PMCID: PMC4819835  PMID: 26707589

Abstract

Vaginal dryness is a common condition that is particularly prevalent during and after the menopause, and is one of the symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy/genitourinary syndrome of menopause. The impact of vaginal dryness on interpersonal relationships, quality of life, daily activities, and sexual function can be significant, but is frequently underestimated. Furthermore, barriers exist to treatment-seeking, and this condition is often underreported and undertreated. Greater education about vaginal dryness and the range of available treatments is essential to encourage more women to seek help for this condition.

Personal lubricants and moisturizers are effective at relieving discomfort and pain during sexual intercourse for women with mild to moderate vaginal dryness, particularly those who have a genuine contraindication to estrogen, or who choose not to use estrogen. However, there is a distinction between lubricants and moisturizers, and notable differences between commercially available products. Women should be advised to choose a product that is optimally balanced in terms of both osmolality and pH, and is physiologically most similar to natural vaginal secretions. A series of recommendations for the use of vaginal lubricants and moisturizers, either on their own or in combination with systemic or topical hormone replacement therapy, is presented.

KEYWORDS: Cytotoxicity, genitourinary syndrome of menopause, lubricant, moisturizer, osmolality, vaginal dryness, vulvovaginal atrophy

Introduction

Vaginal dryness is prevalent among women of all ages, but is particularly common during and after the menopause1–4. Dryness is usually one of many symptoms reported by women as a result of vaginal or vulvovaginal atrophy (VVA). The term ‘genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM)’ has recently been proposed in reference to genitourinary tract symptoms related to the menopause, which is aimed at making the description of symptoms more inclusive and more user-friendly5 , 6. Reported prevalence rates of vaginal dryness due to VVA or GSM vary, but it is estimated that approximately 15% of premenopausal and up to 57% of postmenopausal women experience this condition3.

Although culturally accepted norms and practices regarding lubrication during sex differ between countries, women are typically expected to achieve a moderate amount of vaginal lubrication during sex7. Women themselves report that they prefer vaginal–penile intercourse to feel wetter, feel that they are more easily orgasmic when sex is wetter, and believe their partner prefers sex to feel more wet than dry8. Therefore, it is perhaps unsurprising that a lack of natural lubrication is one of the more commonly encountered sexual problems in the clinical care setting9.

The causes of decreased vaginal lubrication are numerous and include advancing age, hormonal changes, menopause, breastfeeding, stress, conditions such as diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, chronic heart failure and multiple sclerosis10, and iatrogenic causes such as radiation and chemotherapy treatment9 and antidepressant use11.

There is an association between vaginal dryness and painful intercourse12, which is estimated to affect around half of all women at some point in their lives13, and inadequate lubrication is a common cause of dyspareunia (i.e. recurrent or persistent pain with sexual activity that causes marked distress)14.

The female sexual response cycle is initiated by neurotransmitter-mediated vascular and non-vascular smooth muscle relaxation, resulting in increased pelvic blood flow, vaginal lubrication, and clitoral and labial engorgement. These mechanisms are mediated by a combination of neuromuscular and vasocongestive events. Physiological impairments that interfere with the normal female sexual response can cause diminished sexual arousal, libido, vaginal lubrication, genital sensation, and the ability to achieve orgasm15. During the reproductive years, estrogen plays a key role in maintaining the normal vaginal environment. As estrogen levels fall during menopause, vaginal atrophy and thinning and inflammation of the vaginal walls and vulval tissues occur, which can result in decreased vaginal lubrication.

VVA is a widespread condition, with symptoms affecting around half of all peri- and postmenopausal women16. These symptoms can have a substantial negative impact on interpersonal relationships, quality of life, daily activities, and sexual function17. The REal Women's VIews of Treatment Options for Menopausal Vaginal ChangEs (REVIVE) survey in 3046 postmenopausal women with VVA symptoms in the US found the most common symptoms to be dryness (55% of participants), dyspareunia (44%), and irritation (37%), and these symptoms affected enjoyment of sex in over half (59%) of participants17. Symptomatic vaginal atrophy can also occur in younger women due to hypothalamic amenorrhea, hyperprolactinemia, lactation, and use of antiestrogen medications18. Atrophic symptoms affecting the vagina and lower urinary tract are often progressive and frequently require treatment19.

The symptoms of VVA may be successfully managed by a variety of prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) treatments, with choice of therapy dependent on symptom severity, the effectiveness and safety of the therapy for the individual patient, and patient preference. Available treatments include personal lubricants and moisturizers, topical vaginal estrogen, hormone therapy, and the selective estrogen receptor modulator, ospemifene (indicated for dyspareunia)20. Some women are reluctant to use vaginal estrogen, due to safety concerns21. For these women, personal moisturizers and lubricants are often recommended. Lubricants may relieve vaginal dryness and discomfort during sexual activity, providing short-term relief from vaginal dryness and dyspareunia22 , 23. Vaginal moisturizers are intended to be used primarily for the relief of vaginal dryness on a day-to-day basis, to provide comfort and offer long-term benefits. Vaginal moisturizers are classified as Class IIa Medical Devices by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, based on the intended duration of their use (vaginal moisturizers are intended to be present in the body for longer than 60 min, but a single application should not last longer than 30 days). Lubricants may or may not be classified as medical devices, depending on their individual claims.

In women with breast cancer, the main side-effects of treatment, such as vasomotor symptoms and impaired sexual functioning, are related to premature menopause due to chemotherapy and/or anti-hormonal therapy24. For example, treatment with aromatase inhibitors is associated with vaginal dryness and atrophy, which are frequently accompanied by painful intercourse and decreased libido25. The use of hormones (e.g. local or systemic estrogen) poses a potential risk in patients with estrogen-dependent breast cancer, including those receiving antiestrogen adjuvant therapies. Therefore, the recommended first-line therapy for vaginal dryness and dyspareunia is usually non-hormonal treatments, such as personal moisturizers and lubricants25 , 26.

Many women perceive vaginal dryness and discomfort as having a substantial negative impact on their lives, particularly with regard to sexual intimacy, their ability to have a loving relationship, and overall quality of life20 , 27, although the degree to which women are bothered by these conditions varies considerably across countries2.

Despite the availability of various treatment options, underreporting and undertreatment of vaginal dryness are common, and only a minority of women seek medical help19. In a survey conducted in the UK among a representative sample of women aged from 55 to over 85 years (n = 2045), 33% of the study sample who reported dyspareunia and/or vaginal dryness did not seek professional advice, and 36% resorted to an OTC remedy28. Similar findings were also reported from the Vaginal Health: Insights, Views and Attitudes questionnaire-based survey, in which 37% of women with symptoms relating to vaginal discomfort did not consult a health-care professional (HCP), and 40% waited 1 year or more before doing so27.

Evidence suggests that a lack of awareness among women about the physiological changes associated with the menopause and the availability of effective and well-tolerated treatments, reluctance to discuss symptoms with HCPs, safety concerns, inconvenience, and inadequate symptom relief from available treatments are potential barriers to seeking and using treatment16 , 17.

Although personal lubricants and moisturizers have demonstrated effectiveness, they differ in terms of their composition, and certain individual components may be of concern in specific situations. Therefore, it is important to choose the most appropriate lubricant or moisturizer to best suit the needs of the individual patient.

This review provides an overview of commonly available personal lubricants and moisturizers, discusses their composition and advantages and disadvantages, and explores associations between ingredients and potential biological effects. It will also highlight the unmet needs of women with vaginal dryness, and how these can be addressed.

Personal lubricants and moisturizers

Personal lubricants and moisturizers are effective in relieving discomfort and pain during intercourse for women with mild to moderate vaginal dryness, particularly women who are not suitable for vaginal estrogen therapy, or who do not wish to use it. Both lubricants and moisturizers reduce the friction associated with thin, dry genital tissue that can occur as a result of VVA/GSM. The main difference between vaginal moisturizers and lubricants is in their intended use.

Personal lubricants

A wide variety of personal lubricants are commercially available, either as water-, silicone-, mineral oil-, or plant oil-based products, and are applied to the vagina and vulva (and the partner’s penis if required) prior to sex. Lubricants act rapidly to provide short-term relief from vaginal dryness and related pain during sex. They are particularly beneficial for women whose vaginal dryness is a concern only or mainly during sex.

Water-based lubricants have the advantage of being non-staining. An internet-based, double-blind, prospective daily diary study also found that water-based lubricants are associated with fewer genital symptoms in women, compared with silicone-based lubricants29. Excipients acting as humectants, emollients and preservatives are added to water-based lubricants to achieve viscosity, alter water activity, and prevent bacterial contamination, and these will have an impact on pH and osmolality values, which are discussed in further detail in a later section. Oil- and silicone-based lubricants are not addressed in this article because they do not have a pH or an osmolality value, as they contain no water. Some prescription and OTC water-based lubricants will also contain some, or all, of the following: glycerine, propylene glycol, parfum, sweeteners, warming agents and parabens. It is worth pointing out that a few well-known vaginal lubricants do not list the ingredients on the pack.

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that additional lubricants are used with condoms for women in the menopause and postmenopause as well as in other groups, such as female sex workers and men who have sex with men30.

Vaginal moisturizers

Vaginal moisturizers rehydrate dry mucosal tissue and are absorbed into the skin and adhere to the vaginal lining, thereby mimicking natural vaginal secretions. Vaginal moisturizers are intended to be used for the non-hormonal alleviation of vaginal dryness/atrophic vaginitis/vaginal atrophy and they are applied regularly, from every day to once every 2–3 days. Their frequency of use is directly proportional to the severity of atrophy (i.e. the more severe the atrophy, the more frequent the application), and their effects are more long-term than those of lubricants, lasting 2–3 days. Vaginal moisturizers provide this longer relief by changing the fluid content of the endothelium and lowering vaginal pH31, thereby maintaining vaginal moisture and acidity. They are therefore particularly beneficial not only for women with symptoms of VVA/GSM that cause pain during sexual activity, but also for women who are not necessarily sexually active, but experience day-to-day discomfort. As vaginal moisturizers are intended to moisturize the mucosa, the majority contain water. In order for the water to adhere to the mucosa, they also contain either plant-based or synthetic polymers. In addition, they contain a wide range of other excipients to provide the appropriate viscosity, pH buffering and preservation, and it is these additional ingredients (and some synthetic polymers) that will affect the pH and osmolality of the moisturizer.

A list of commercially available vaginal moisturizers and lubricants, with their ingredients, pH and osmolality values, is provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Commonly used personal lubricants available world-wide. Certified organic ingredients are in bold.

Name Ingredients pH Osmolality (mOsm/kg)
Moisturizers      
Canesintima Intimate Moisturiser aqua, glycerin, glyceryl polymethacrylate, capryloyl glycine, sorbitol, acrylates/C10-30 alkyl acrylate crosspolymer, sodium hyaluronate, sodium benzoate, sodium hydroxide, galactoarabinan, butylene glycol/Camellia japonica leaf/flower extract, tetrasodium EDTA, p-ansic acid, levulinic acid 5.63 a 846 b
Gynomunal Vaginal Moisturising Gel hop extract (Humulus lupulus), tocopherol acetate (vitamin E), purified water, propylene glycol, denatured ethanol, soya lecithin (E322), carbomer, methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate (E219), cholesterol, imidazolidinylurea, triethanolamine, sodium edetate, hyaluron 5.84 a >2000 b
Hyalofemme Vaginal Hydrating Gel hydeal-D (hyaluronic acid derivative), propylene glycol, carbomer, methyl p-hydroxybenzoate, propyl p-hydroxybenzoate, sodium hydroxide, purified water 4.88 a 1729 b
Regelle Long-Lasting Vaginal Moisturiser purified water, polycarbophil, glycerol, mineral oil, hydrogenated palm oil glycerides, carbopol 974P, sorbic acid 2.88 a 2012 b
Replens MD Longer-Lasting Vaginal Moisturiser purified water Ph. Eur. 78.64% w/w, glycerin, mineral oil, polycarbophil, carbomer homopolymer type B, hydrogenated palm oil glyceride, methylparaben, sorbic acid, sodium hydroxide 2.95 a 2011 b
Sylk Natural Intimate Moisturiser water, extracts of kiwifruit plant and citrus seed, xanthan gum, vegetable glycerin, citric acid, potassium sorbate, sodium citrate 4.47 877 b
Yes Vaginal Moisturiser f aqua, Aloe barbadensisleaf juice, guar gum, locust bean gum, flax seed extract, xanthan gum, sodium chloride, citric acid, potassium sorbate, phenoxyethanol 4.15 250
Lubricants      
Astroglide Gel Lubricant purified water, glycerin, hydroxyethylcellulose, chlorhexidine gluconate, methylparaben, glucono delta lactone, sodium hydroxide 4.38 6100 b , c
Astroglide Ultra Gentle Sensitive Skin Lubricant purified water, xylitol, hydroxyethylcellulose, Aloe barbadensis leaf juice, pectin, Chamomilla recutita (Matricaria) flower extract, phenoxyethanol 4.56 a 945 b
Balance Activ Menopause Vaginal Moisturising Lubricant phosphate-buffered saline, sodium hyaluronate (hyaluronic acid), phenoxyethanol, methylparaben 5.64 a 309
Bioglide Natural Lubricant glycerin, aqua, sodium lactate, xanthan gum, levulinic acid, sodium levulinate 4.99 a >2000 b
Durex Play Feel Lubricant purified water, propylene glycol, hydroxyethylcellulose, benzoic acid, sodium hydroxide 5.48 a 1563 b
Durex Sensilube Hydrating Intimate Gel aqua, phenoxyethanol, polyacrylamide, hydroxyethylcellulose, methylparaben, ethylparaben, propylparaben, citric acid 5.99 a 16 b
Good Clean Love Lubricant Aloe barbadensisleaf juice, xanthan gum, agar, lactic acid, potassium sorbate, sodium benzoate, natural flavor 4.73 a 240
Higher Nature V Gel Aloe Vera Lubricant Aloe barbadensis (Aloe vera), purified aqua, glycerine, xanthan gum, panthenol, allantoin, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, Calendula (marigold), retinyl palmitate (vitamin A), tocopheryl acetate (vitamin E), zinc gluconate, citric acid 4.09 1646 b
ID Glide Lubricant water, glycerin, propylene glycol, cellulose polymer, polyethylene oxide, sodium benzoate, methylparaben, carbomer 981, tetrahydroxypropyl ethylenediamine, diazolidinyl urea, EDTA 5.20 a 3200 b , c
Intimate Organics Lubricant water, propanediol, cellulose gum, sodium benzoate, citric acid, alcohol denat, Lycium barbarum fruit extract, Cymbopogon schoenanthus extract, Aloe barbadensis leaf extract 4.86 a >2000 b
Intimy Lubricant hydroxyethylcellulose, glycerin, cocoalkonium chloride, citric acid 6.19 a 1501 b
Klick Natural Glide Lubricant aqua (water), propylene glycol, glycerin, hydroxyethylcellulose, phenoxyethanol, lactic acid, sodium saccharin, benzoic acid, sodium hydroxide, dehydroacetic acid 4.84 a >2000 b
KY Jelly Lubricant water, glycerin, hydroxyethylcellulose, chlorhexidine gluconate, gluconolactone, methylparaben, sodium hydroxide 4.49 2007 b
Phyto Soya Vaginal Gel aqua, glycerin, paraffinum liquidum, sodium hydroxide, carbomer, soya extract (glycine max), phenoxyethanol, methylparaben, propylparaben, isobutylparaben 4.94 a 1557 b
Pjur Med Natural Glide Personal Lubricant aqua (water), glycerin, xanthan gum, benzyl alcohol, sodium benzoate, potassium sorbate, citric acid 4.41 >2000 b
Pjur Woman Nude Lubricant aqua (water), propylene glycol, ethoxydiglycol, hydroxypropyl guar hydroxypropyltrimonium chloride, hydroxyethylcellulose, sodium saccharin, citric acid 4.42 >2000 b
RepHresh Vaginal Gel purified water, glycerin, polycarbophil, carbomer homopolymer type B, ethylparaben sodium, methylparaben sodium, propylparaben sodium, sodium hydroxide 3.46 a 1914 b
Ritex Sensitiv Gel aqua, glycerin, propylene glycol, hydroxyethylcellulose, sodium lactate, lactic acid 4.04 >2000 b
Sass Intimate Dryness Gel aqua, glycerin, butylene glycol, ammonium acryloydimethyl taurate, VP copolymer, panthenol, xylitylglucoside, anhydroxylitol, PEG-40 hydrogenated castor oil, allantoin, sodium benzoate, xylitol, Aloe barbadensis leaf juice, potassium sorbate, parfum, disodium EDTA 4.99 a >2000 b
Simply Slick Personal Lubricating Lotion castor oil, purified water, jojoba oil, vegetable glycerin, pectin, Stevia, optiflo H370VF 6.68 a >2000 b
System Jo Personal Lubricant water (aqua), locust bean gum, Aloe barbadensisleaf juice, Euterpe oleracea(Acai) pulp powder, xanthan gum, citrus extract 5.86 a 61
Yes But Anal Lubricant aqua, Aloe barbadensisleaf juice, guar gum, locust bean gum, xanthan gum, honeysuckle flower extract, sodium chloride, citric acid, sodium hydroxide 7.78 a , d 330 d
Yes Baby Sperm-Friendly Lubricant aqua, Aloe barbadensisleaf juice, guar gum, locust bean gum, xanthan gum, honeysuckle flower extract, sodium chloride, citric acid, sodium hydroxide 7.65 a , e 333 e
Yes Baby Vaginal-Friendly Lubricant aqua, Aloe barbadensisleaf juice, guar gum, locust bean gum, flax seed extract, xanthan gum, sodium chloride, citric acid, potassium sorbate, phenoxyethanol 4.22 249
Yes Water-Based Intimate Lubricant aqua, Aloe barbadensisleaf juice, flax seed extract, guar gum, locust bean gum, xanthan gum, sodium chloride, potassium sorbate, citric acid, phenoxyethanol 4.08 154
Open in a new tab

a, Values are outside the normal vaginal pH range of 3.8–4.530;

b,

values represent hypo-osmolar (< 32 mOsm/kg) or hyperosmolar preparations that exceed the ideal osmolality threshold of 380 mOsm/kg recommended by the World Health Organization for a personal lubricant (most of which also exceed the real-world recommended threshold of 1200 mOsm/kg)30, and which therefore have the potential to cause irritation and/or damage to vaginal or rectal mucosa;

c,

osmolality value taken from Wolf 201268;

d,

matches rectal pH (∼7.0) and osmolality;

e,

matches semen pH and osmolality;

f,

Class IIa in progress.

All ingredient lists were taken from products purchased June to August 2015. Product and batch numbers are available on request from The Yes Yes Company Ltd. Osmolality and pH testing methods are described in the online Supplemental Material S1 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2015.1124259).

Perceptions and attitudes towards lubrication and lubricants

The use of commercially available personal lubricants is common among adult women32 and their perceptions of lubricants and lubricant use are generally positive, although women in their forties report more positive perceptions of lubricants than women under the age of 308.

Younger women and those without sexual dysfunctions, such as vaginal dryness or dyspareunia, are more likely to use lubricants to enhance the sexual experience and make sex more comfortable, fun, and pleasurable, while older women and those with dyspareunia or symptoms of VVA/GSM report using lubricants to reduce or alleviate discomfort and pain12 , 32.

Evidence suggests that the use of personal lubricants is more frequent as part of partnered intercourse and sexual play or foreplay, compared with other solo and partnered sexual behaviors32. A study has shown that the use of water- or silicone-based lubricants is associated with higher ratings of sexual pleasure and satisfaction for penile–vaginal sex, as well as solo sex, compared with no lubricant use29.

Characteristics to consider when choosing a personal lubricant

Personal lubricants can be composed of a variety of ingredients as shown in Table 1. The pH, osmolality, and presence of certain individual components in a personal lubricant may be associated with detrimental biological effects, meaning that some products are less suitable for use in specific situations and populations, such as couples trying to conceive or those at higher risk of exposure to sexually transmitted infections.

Links between osmolality, pH and cytotoxicity of lubricants

In the vagina, a multispecies microbiota usually associated with bacterial vaginosis occurs as a dense biofilm, while a lactobacilli-dominant microbiota is sparsely distributed on the vaginal epithelium33. Estrogen stimulates the proliferation of lactobacilli, reduces pH, and prevents vaginal colonization of Enterobacteriaceae, which are the main pathogens of the urinary tract. In postmenopausal women, a reduction in estrogen leads to declining lactobacilli numbers and a subsequent rise in vaginal pH, which provides favorable conditions for colonization of the vagina with Enterobacteriaceae from the rectum34.

The osmolality of personal lubricants can vary widely, as shown in a recent evaluation of a panel of products available in Europe and North America (Figure 1a). Osmolality of personal lubricants has been the focus of recent advice from the WHO, in collaboration with the United Nations Population Fund and Family Health International30. The WHO recommends that the osmolality of a personal lubricant should not exceed 380 mOsm/kg, in order to minimize any risk of epithelial damage; however, because most of the commercially available preparations greatly exceed this value, an upper limit of 1200 mOsm/kg is generally deemed acceptable in practice30.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Osmolality (a) and pH (b) of a panel of personal lubricants and moisturizers available world-wide. Black bars represent hyperosmolar preparations that exceed the ideal osmolality threshold of 380 mOsm/kg recommended by the World Health Organization for a personal lubricant (most of which also exceed the real-world recommended threshold of 1200 mOsm/kg)30, and which therefore have the potential to cause irritation and/or damage to vaginal or rectal mucosa. In healthy adults, normal vaginal and rectal pH ranges are 3.8–4.5 and ∼7.0, respectively30. Gray bars represent preparations that are considered outside of these thresholds. Osmolality and pH testing methods are described in the online Supplemental Material S1 (http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2015.1124259).

Greater osmolality of personal lubricants has been significantly correlated with increased potential to cause mucosal irritation and tissue damage in a slug mucosal irritation (SMI) assay. This assay is used as a sensitive measure of mucus membrane tolerance for vaginal microbicide products and carriers, and the degree of irritation in the assay can predict genital burning, heat and itching in humans35. Arion lusitanicus slugs were treated with lubricants over 5 days to quantify mucus production and tissue damage, allowing assignment of each product to an irritation potency category (i.e. none, mild, moderate or severe). Results showed hypo-osmotic lubricants (32–316 mOsm/kg) had no adverse effects, moderately hyperosmotic lubricants (Replens: 2143 mOsm/kg, KY Jelly: 2463 mOsm/kg) induced mild to moderate irritation, and a very hyperosmotic lubricant (Astroglide: 5848 mOsm/kg) caused severe irritation and tissue damage35.

High osmolality of personal lubricants has also been associated with cytotoxicity. In a prospective, comparative, in vitro study, incubating sperm with hyperosmolar lubricants (> 1000 mOsm/kg; Astroglide, KY Jelly, Replens) led to loss of motility and DNA integrity36. Exposure to hyperosmolar lubricants has also been shown in vitro to damage epithelial cell lines, and cervical and colorectal explant cultures37, and, when applied rectally in humans, hyperosmolar lubricants cause significant damage and denudation of the epithelium38.

Like osmolality, pH can vary widely among personal lubricant products (Figure 1b). In healthy adults, normal vaginal and rectal pH ranges are 3.8–4.5 and ∼7.0, respectively30, and the optimum requirements for both vaginal and rectal intercourse cannot be bridged in a single lubricant. Cunha and colleagues commented that 'outcomes of low pH are even less understood, but animal data suggest that values of 3 or less are unacceptable for human use'39. Therefore, clinicians need to be aware that some preparations do not meet this recommendation (see Table 1).

Excipients in personal lubricants

Although cytotoxic effects associated with hyperosmolar lubricants have been demonstrated in vitro and in humans in several studies36–38, a recent study of 12 commercially available lubricants of varying pH and osmolalities failed to find a significant association between these criteria and cytotoxicity39. The authors suggested that individual components of the surveyed personal lubricants therefore may have a greater influence on cytotoxicity than pH or osmolality, and added that 'further specific toxicity testing using vaginal microbiota, namely Lactobacillus spp., is advisable'39.

Parabens

Parabens are included as preservatives in a variety of personal care, cosmetic and food products, and are found in some personal lubricants, such as KY Jelly, Replens and Astroglide. Parabens are weakly estrogenic compounds and there is some debate as to whether they present an endocrine-disrupting risk40–42. Parabens have been detected in breast tumors43, but direct associations with carcinogenesis or significant adverse effects in toxicology studies have not been convincingly demonstrated, and further research is needed.

Glycols

Glycol concentration is the primary factor determining osmolality for the majority of personal lubricants30. Glycols serve as humectants/emollients in lubricants, and glycerol/glycerine and propylene glycol are the most common. To maintain the osmolality of a personal lubricant at < 1200 mOsm/kg, the WHO advises that the concentration of glycerol should not exceed 9.9% mass fraction (w/w), and the concentration of propylene glycol (or a mixture of glycols) should not exceed approximately 8.3% mass fraction (w/w)30.

Apart from their key role in osmolality and mucosal irritation, glycols have also shown adverse effects in animal and in vitro studies. Vaginal application of glycerol monolaurate, glycerine, propylene glycol and PEG-8 all significantly increased susceptibility to herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) in a mouse model44. An OTC personal lubricant containing propylene glycol, glycerine and methylparaben has also been shown to kill Lactobacillus crispatus in vitro, which is the dominant bacterial species in the vaginal microbiome that helps maintain a healthy mucosal barrier and acidic pH45. Indeed, recent personal lubricant use is associated with incident bacterial vaginosis outbreaks (adjusted odds ratio 11.75, 95% confidence interval 1.96–70.27), and this is thought to be related to the presence of glycerine and/or the microbicidal preservative chlorhexidine in the lubricant46. Low concentrations of glycerine/glycerol and their metabolites have also been shown to serve as a food source for Candida albicans 47.

Microbicides and preservatives

Microbicides in personal lubricants can cause epithelial damage and inflammation of the genital mucosa, alterations in the vaginal microbiome, and increased susceptibility to sexually transmitted infections. For example, early research showed that the microbicidal and spermicidal detergent, nonoxynol-9, caused rapid exfoliation of uterine and rectal epithelial cells in animal models48 , 49 and rectal epithelium in humans50. In animal studies, nonoxynol-9-associated irritation and mucosal damage was accompanied by increased susceptibility to infection by HSV-249 , 51. In the SMI assay, nonoxynol-9-containing personal lubricants induced severe mucosal irritation, while products without nonoxynol-9 did not52. Nonoxynol-9-containing personal lubricants were also shown to remove rectal mucosa, which may promote rectal transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other sexually transmitted infections53. Consequently, the WHO does not recommend the use of nonoxynol-9-containing personal lubricants30. Today, nonoxynol-9 is used infrequently, mainly on condoms.

Certain preservatives are associated with negative effects on pathogen transmission. After a single vaginal administration, chlorhexidine caused cellular damage in a mouse chlamydia model, accompanied by a 100-fold increased susceptibility to infection versus without the detergent54. In a cell monolayer model, personal lubricants containing polyquaternium-15 significantly increased HIV-1 replication in vitro 55.

Effects on fecundity

The effect of personal lubricants and vaginal moisturizers on fecundity remains to be resolved56. In vitro studies have shown that some commonly used personal lubricants, such as Astroglide, KY Jelly and Replens, can greatly impair sperm motility, even at very low concentrations36 , 57–60. In one study, sperm exposed to KY Jelly became immobile after 60 min59, and a >10% increase in chromatin damage after lubricant exposure in sperm from healthy donors has also been reported36. In contrast, Pre-Seed was found to have no effect on sperm motility and did not disrupt sperm chromatin structure36. Similarly, DNA fragmentation was not observed in a more recent study of the effects of nine different products on sperm from men attending a fertility clinic61.

The negative consequences on sperm motility and viability may be attributed to the presence of constituents, such as glycerine, which can damage the flagellar membrane of sperm62 and profoundly inhibit sperm motility59, and the non-physiological pH and/or osmolality of certain lubricants. The optimum pH for sperm migration and survival in cervical mucus is 7.2–8.563, and a reduction in sperm motility is observed at pH levels below 664. Similarly, sperm motility is nearly abolished with increases in osmolality approaching 600 mOsm/kg65, and a physiologic osmolality of 270–360 mOsm/kg is best for sperm function36.

Despite many studies demonstrating harmful effects of personal lubricants on sperm in vitro, a large, prospective cohort study in couples trying to conceive (n = 296 women) found no evidence of reduced fecundity among lubricant users versus their counterparts who did not use lubricants (the lubricants used were not specified by the study participants)56. Further randomized, controlled studies are needed to determine the effects of personal lubricants on fertility.

Key practical issues

The impact of vaginal dryness on quality of life is often underestimated. From the couple’s perspective, vaginal dryness can cause problems in relationships. It can accentuate erectile dysfunction in the male partner, and even cause single women to avoid entering into a relationship with a potential new partner.

Many women are reluctant to raise such problems with their HCP due to embarrassment and/or cultural reasons, and HCPs often do not proactively raise the issue in consultations because they are uncomfortable discussing sexual issues6. There is also a lack of knowledge about the range of effective treatment options that are available.

Two key challenges that need to be addressed are: (1) encouraging more women to report symptoms of VVA/GSM and (2) educating HCPs, i.e. nurses, general practitioners, sexual health specialists and gynecologists, to sensitively engage in conversation with their patients about these problems. Even though VVA/GSM is known to affect up to 50% of women postmenopausally23, evidence suggests that, if HCPs fail to ask the correct questions, only a small proportion of these women will proactively state that there is a problem.

Vulval irritation and contact dermatitis are common complaints among women66 and can be caused by exposure to hyperosmotic lubricants and excipients. However, identifying these as the causative agents and eliminating them can be challenging. There is also the potential for misdiagnosis, with vulval irritation commonly diagnosed as candidal vulvovaginitis (vaginal thrush)67. Misdiagnosis and prescribing or recommending products which then cause irritation may be associated with increased treatment costs, because patients may require additional medication.

The benefits of a good-quality lubricant/moisturizer are clear in women who have a genuine contraindication to estrogen, or in those who choose not to use estrogen; however, in our view, most women/couples can benefit from a good-quality lubricant, regardless of whether it is appropriate for the woman to use estrogen or not. There is likely to be a synergistic benefit to a good lubricant being used with estrogen or ospemifene, although this observation is based solely on clinical experience, and further research is needed to confirm it. The use of topical estrogen and lubricants at different times of the day is recommended, because it is possible that estrogen absorption may be impeded if applied immediately after using a lubricant. It is also recommended to delay intercourse until at least 1 hour after the application of estrogen, in order to avoid any possibility of transmission to the partner.

In our clinical practice, we encourage patients to choose a lubricant which is physiologically most similar to natural vaginal secretions (i.e. a 'body identical replacement'). Given the evidence presented in this paper and in our clinical experience, we believe it is vital that the chosen product is optimally balanced in terms of both osmolality and pH.

A public awareness campaign combined with education for HCPs would be valuable to highlight the differences between different lubricants and moisturizers and to encourage the routine use of a good-quality, 'body identical' lubricant by HCPs during examination and smear taking.

Conclusion

Vaginal dryness is a common symptom in women with VVA/GSM and has a substantial negative impact on their sexual and overall quality of life. Despite this, barriers exist to treatment-seeking, and this condition is underreported and undertreated.

Women with VVA/GSM should be encouraged to discuss their symptoms, and HCPs should proactively raise this topic with their patients, in a sensitive manner. Greater education about vaginal dryness and the range of treatments available may urge women to seek treatment, with HCPs playing a pivotal role in this regard. Both primary and secondary HCPs need to proactively consider the possibility of VVA/GSM in patients who are not obviously seeking a gynecological opinion, such as patients with diabetes or those taking antidepressants. Clinical experience shows that, in general, patients are not insulted if sexual problems are discussed.

Personal lubricants and moisturizers are effective treatment options in the management of vaginal dryness with a variety of causes. However, differences exist between commercially available products. Given that non-physiological pH and osmolality, and the presence of excipients such as parabens and microbicides, are associated with a variety of proven or potential detrimental effects, the recommended safe values for pH and osmolality should be carefully ensured when choosing or prescribing a personal lubricant. This provides a stimulus for both regulatory authorities and manufacturers to work together in reformulating preparations to be more patient-friendly.

It is advised that women choose a product that is optimally balanced in terms of both osmolality and pH and is physiologically most similar to natural vaginal secretions. Table 2 contains a series of recommendations for the use of vaginal lubricants and moisturizers, either on their own or in combination with systemic or topical hormone replacement therapy.

Table 2.

Recommendations for health-care professionals on vaginal lubricants and moisturizers for use on their own or in combination with hormone replacement therapy (systemic or topical).

Symptom or situation Recommendation Rationale
Urogenital atrophy, elevated vaginal pH, experiencing pain in daily life due to extreme dryness Use a vaginal moisturizer with acidic pH and osmolality below the WHO ideal recommendation of 380 mOsm/kg Rehydrate vaginal tissues and lower vaginal pH to minimize infection (e.g. bacterial vaginosis)
Dyspareunia (painful intercourse) caused by urogenital atrophy Use a vaginal lubricant with acidic pH matched to vaginal pH and with osmolality below the WHO ideal recommendation of 380 mOsm/kg Lubricate dry vaginal tissues without causing irritation and maintain or lower vaginal pH
Urogenital atrophy as a result of cancer treatment when HRT is contraindicated, or in combination with topical estrogen if still experiencing discomfort from atrophy For daily comfort, use a paraben-free vaginal moisturizer with acidic pH and osmolality below the WHO ideal recommendation of 380 mOsm/kgFor sexual intercourse or for use with vaginal dilators, use a paraben-free vaginal lubricant with acidic pH matched to vaginal pH and osmolality below the WHO ideal recommendation of 380 mOsm/kg Rehydrate vaginal tissues and lower vaginal pH to minimize infectionLubricate dry vaginal tissues without causing irritation and maintain or lower vaginal pHAvoid potential endocrine disruptors (i.e. paraben preservatives)
Trying to conceive and needing a lubricant At ovulation, use a sperm-friendly lubricant Lubricant is pH-matched and iso-osmotic to semen
Rectal/anal sex Use a rectal lubricant that is condom-compatible with osmolality below the WHO ideal recommendation of 380 mOsm/kg and a pH matched to rectal pH Reduce the risk of condom damage and resulting pathogen transmission, without irritating/damaging the rectal epithelium
Vaginal or rectal examination Use a lubricant that is pH-matched for the vagina or rectum and has osmolality below the WHO ideal recommendation of 380 mOsm/kg Reduce the risk of irritating/damaging the vaginal or rectal epithelium
Open in a new tab

HRT, hormone replacement therapy; WHO, World Health Organization.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_1124259.docx
Click here for additional data file. (20.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Joke Lenoir, PhD of the Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Technology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, for performing the osmolality and pH testing of the panel of vaginal lubricants and moisturizers. Medical writing assistance was provided by Sarah Stowell, PhD CMPP and James Reed, PhD of Blue Heeler Ltd and funded by the Yes Yes Company Ltd.

Conflict of interest

Dr Edwards has acted in an advisory capacity and as a speaker for, and has received honoraria and financial support from, Bayer HealthCare, Besins Healthcare, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Owen Mumford and Schwabe Pharma. Mr Panay has acted in an advisory capacity and lectured for a number of pharmaceutical companies, including Abbott, Bayer HealthCare, Besins Healthcare, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, SeCure and Shionogi.

Source of funding

Medical writing assistance was funded by the Yes Yes Company Ltd.

References

  1. Dunn KM, Croft PR, Hackett GI. Sexual problems: a study of the prevalence and need for health care in the general population. Fam Pract. 1998;15:519–24. doi: 10.1093/fampra/15.6.519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Leiblum SR, Hayes RD, Wanser RA, Nelson JS. Vaginal dryness: a comparison of prevalence and interventions in 11 countries. J Sex Med. 2009;6:2425–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01369.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Palacios S. Managing urogenital atrophy. Maturitas. 2009;63:315–18. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Panay N, Fenton A. Vulvovaginal atrophy – a tale of neglect. Climacteric. 2014;17:1–2. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.872519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Portman DJ, Gass ML, Vulvovaginal Atrophy Terminology Consensus Conference Panel Genitourinary syndrome of menopause: new terminology for vulvovaginal atrophy from the International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health and The North American Menopause Society. Climacteric. 2014;17:557–63. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2014.946279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Panay N. Genitourinary syndrome of the menopause – dawn of a new era. Climacteric. 2015;18(Suppl 1):13–17. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2015.1070564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Braunstein S, van de Wijgert J. Preferences and practices related to vaginal lubrication: implications for microbicide acceptability and clinical testing. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2005;14:424–33. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2005.14.424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jozkowski KN, Herbenick D, Schick V, Reece M, Sanders SA, Fortenberry JD. Women's perceptions about lubricant use and vaginal wetness during sexual activities. J Sex Med. 2013;10:484–92. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Andelloux M. Products for sexual lubrication: understanding and addressing options with your patients. Nurs Womens Health. 2011;15:253–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-486X.2011.01642.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cordeau D, Courtois F. Sexual disorders in women with MS: assessment and management. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;57:337–47. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kennedy SH, Rizvi S. Sexual dysfunction, depression, and the impact of antidepressants. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009;29:157–64. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31819c76e9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutton KS, Boyer SC, Goldfinger C, Ezer P, Pukall CF. To lube or not to lube: experiences and perceptions of lubricant use in women with and without dyspareunia. J Sex Med. 2012;9:240–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02543.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jamieson DJ, Steege JF. The prevalence of dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain, and irritable bowel syndrome in primary care practices. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:55–8. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00360-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Seehusen DA, Baird DC, Bode DV. Dyspareunia in women. Am Fam Physician. 2014;90:465–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Berman JR, Adhikari SP, Goldstein I. Anatomy and physiology of female sexual function and dysfunction: classification, evaluation and treatment options. Eur Urol. 2000;38:20–9. doi: 10.1159/000020247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lev-Sagie A. Vulvar and vaginal atrophy: physiology, clinical presentation, and treatment considerations. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58:476–91. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kingsberg SA, Wysocki S, Magnus L, Krychman ML. Vulvar and vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women: findings from the REVIVE (REal Women's VIews of Treatment Options for Menopausal Vaginal ChangEs) survey. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1790–9. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Goldstein AT, Burrows LJ. http://www.issm.info/news/review-reports/sexual-pain-disorders-in-women [Google Scholar]
  19. Sturdee DW, Panay N. Recommendations for the management of postmenopausal vaginal atrophy. Climacteric. 2010;13:509–22. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2010.522875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. The North American Menopause Society Management of symptomatic vulvovaginal atrophy: 2013 position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2013;20:888–902. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e3182a122c2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen J, Geng L, Song X, Li H, Giordan N, Liao Q. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of hyaluronic acid vaginal gel to ease vaginal dryness: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group, clinical trial. J Sex Med. 2013;10:1575–84. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bachmann GA, Nevadunsky NS. Diagnosis and treatment of atrophic vaginitis. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:3090–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Sinha A, Ewies AA. Non-hormonal topical treatment of vulvovaginal atrophy: an up-to-date overview. Climacteric. 2013;16:305–12. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2012.756466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lammerink EA, de Bock GH, Schroder CP, Mourits MJ. The management of menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors: case-based approach. Maturitas. 2012;73:265–8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Derzko C, Elliott S, Lam W. Management of sexual dysfunction in postmenopausal breast cancer patients taking adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy. Curr Oncol. 2007;14(Suppl 1):S20–40. doi: 10.3747/co.2007.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pruthi S, Simon JA, Early AP. Current overview of the management of urogenital atrophy in women with breast cancer. Breast J. 2011;17:403–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Simon JA, Kokot-Kierepa M, Goldstein J, Nappi RE. Vaginal health in the United States: results from the Vaginal Health: Insights, Views & Attitudes survey. Menopause. 2013;20:1043–8. doi: 10.1097/GME.0b013e318287342d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Barlow DH, Cardozo LD, Francis RM.et alUrogenital ageing and its effect on sexual health in older British women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 199710487–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herbenick D, Reece M, Hensel D, Sanders S, Jozkowski K, Fortenberry JD. Association of lubricant use with women's sexual pleasure, sexual satisfaction, and genital symptoms: a prospective daily diary study. J Sex Med. 2011;8:202–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. World Health Organization . http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/76580/1/WHO_RHR_12.33_eng.pdf [Google Scholar]
  31. Willhite LA, O’Connell MB. Urogenital atrophy: prevention and treatment. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:464–80. doi: 10.1592/phco.21.5.464.34486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Herbenick D, Reece M, Schick V, Sanders SA, Fortenberry JD. Women's use and perceptions of commercial lubricants: prevalence and characteristics in a nationally representative sample of American adults. J Sex Med. 2014;11:642–52. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Cribby S, Taylor M, Reid G. Vaginal microbiota and the use of probiotics. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2008;2008:256490. doi: 10.1155/2008/256490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Raz R. Urinary tract infection in postmenopausal women. Korean J Urol. 2011;52:801–8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2011.52.12.801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Adriaens E, Remon JP. Mucosal irritation potential of personal lubricants relates to product osmolality as detected by the slug mucosal irritation assay. Sex Transm Dis. 2008;35:512–16. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181644669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Cocuzza M, Short RA, Evenson DP. Effect of vaginal lubricants on sperm motility and chromatin integrity: a prospective comparative study. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:375–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dezzutti CS, Brown ER, Moncla B.et alIs wetter better? An evaluation of over-the-counter personal lubricants for safety and anti-HIV-1 activity. PLoS One 20127e48328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fuchs EJ, Lee LA, Torbenson MS.et alHyperosmolar sexual lubricant causes epithelial damage in the distal colon: potential implication for HIV transmission. J Infect Dis 2007195703–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Cunha AR, Machado RM, Palmeira-de-Oliveira A, Martinez-de-Oliveira J, das Neves J, Palmeira-de-Oliveira R. Characterization of commercially available vaginal lubricants: a safety perspective. Pharmaceutics. 2014;6:530–42. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics6030530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Bledzka D, Gromadzinska J, Wasowicz W. Parabens. From environmental studies to human health. Environ Int. 2014;67:27–42. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Karpuzoglu E, Holladay SD, Gogal RM., Jr. Parabens: potential impact of low-affinity estrogen receptor binding chemicals on human health. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2013;16:321–35. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2013.809252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nohynek GJ, Borgert CJ, Dietrich D, Rozman KK. Endocrine disruption: fact or urban legend? Toxicol Lett. 2013;223:295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Harvey PW, Everett DJ. Significance of the detection of esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid (parabens) in human breast tumours. J Appl Toxicol. 2004;24:1–4. doi: 10.1002/jat.957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Moench TR, Mumper RJ, Hoen TE, Sun M, Cone RA. Microbicide excipients can greatly increase susceptibility to genital herpes transmission in the mouse. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:331. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fashemi B, Delaney ML, Onderdonk AB, Fichorova RN. Effects of feminine hygiene products on the vaginal mucosal biome. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2013;24 doi: 10.3402/mehd.v24i0.19703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Brotman RM, Ravel J, Cone RA, Zenilman JM. Rapid fluctuation of the vaginal microbiota measured by Gram stain analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2010;86:297–302. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.040592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kabara JJ, Orth DS. Preservative-Free and Self-Preserving Cosmetics and Drugs. Principles and Practice. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dayal MB, Wheeler J, Williams CJ, Barnhart KT. Disruption of the upper female reproductive tract epithelium by nonoxynol-9. Contraception. 2003;68:273–9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(03)00178-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Phillips DM, Zacharopoulos VR. Nonoxynol-9 enhances rectal infection by herpes simplex virus in mice. Contraception. 1998;57:341–8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00040-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Phillips DM, Taylor CL, Zacharopoulos VR, Maguire RA. Nonoxynol-9 causes rapid exfoliation of sheets of rectal epithelium. Contraception. 2000;62:149–54. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00156-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Cone RA, Hoen T, Wong X, Abusuwwa R, Anderson DJ, Moench TR. Vaginal microbicides: detecting toxicities in vivo that paradoxically increase pathogen transmission. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Dhondt MM, Adriaens E, Remon JP. The evaluation of the local tolerance of vaginal formulations, with or without nonoxynol-9, using the slug mucosal irritation test. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31:229–35. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000118422.62336.fa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Phillips DM, Sudol KM, Taylor CL, Guichard L, Elsen R, Maguire RA. Lubricants containing N-9 may enhance rectal transmission of HIV and other STIs. Contraception. 2004;70:107–10. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Achilles SL, Shete PB, Whaley KJ, Moench TR, Cone RA. Microbicide efficacy and toxicity tests in a mouse model for vaginal transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:655–64. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200211000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Begay O, Jean-Pierre N, Abraham CJ.et alIdentification of personal lubricants that can cause rectal epithelial cell damage and enhance HIV type 1 replication in vitro. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2011271019–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Steiner AZ, Long DL, Tanner C, Herring AH. Effect of vaginal lubricants on natural fertility. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:44–51. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825b87ae. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Anderson L, Lewis SE, McClure N. The effects of coital lubricants on sperm motility in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:3351–6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.12.3351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Frishman GN, Luciano AA, Maier DB. Evaluation of Astroglide, a new vaginal lubricant: effects of length of exposure and concentration on sperm motility. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:630–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Kutteh WH, Chao CH, Ritter JO, Byrd W. Vaginal lubricants for the infertile couple: effect on sperm activity. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1996;41:400–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Sandhu RS, Wong TH, Kling CA, Chohan KR. In vitro effects of coital lubricants and synthetic and natural oils on sperm motility. Fertil Steril. 2014;101:941–4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Mowat A, Newton C, Boothroyd C, Demmers K, Fleming S. The effects of vaginal lubricants on sperm function: an in vitro analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:333–9. doi: 10.1007/s10815-013-0168-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Amelar RD, Dubin L, Schoenfeld C. Sperm motility. Fertil Steril. 1980;34:197–215. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)44949-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. World Health Organization . http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241547789_eng.pdf [Google Scholar]
  64. Peek JC, Matthews CD. The pH of cervical mucus, quality of semen, and outcome of the post-coital test. Clin Reprod Fertil. 1986;4:217–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Rossato M, Balercia G, Lucarelli G, Foresta C, Mantero F. Role of seminal osmolarity in the reduction of human sperm motility. Int J Androl. 2002;25:230–5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2002.00353.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Connor CJ, Eppsteiner EE. Vulvar contact dermatitis. Proc Obstet Gynecol. 2014;4:1. [Google Scholar]
  67. Majerovich JA, Canty A, Miedema B. Chronic vulvar irritation: could toilet paper be the culprit? Can Fam Physician. 2010;56:350–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wolf LK. Studies raise questions about safety of personal lubricants. Chem Eng News. 2012;90:46–7. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_1124259.docx
Click here for additional data file. (20.8KB, docx)

Articles from Climacteric are provided here courtesy of Taylor & Francis

RESOURCES