Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2015 Sep 25;54(47):14154–14158. doi: 10.1002/anie.201507373

Table 1.

Optimization of Alkynylation of Acetal 2a[a]

graphic file with name nihms-741708-f0004.jpg
entry L* base yield(%)[b] ee (%)[c]
1[d],[e] L1 iPr2NEt 21 8
2[e] L1 iPr2NEt 20 0
3 L1 iPr2NEt 83 4
4 L2 iPr2NEt 83 37
5 L3 iPr2NEt 24 27
6 L2 DBU 16 36
7 L3 DBU 32 81
8 L3 MTBD 22 84
9[f] L3 MTBD 12 87
10[f],[g],[h] L3 MTBD 87 78
[a]

Conditions: Acetal 2a (0.08 mmol, 1.0 equv), Cu(MeCN)4PF6 (0.008 mmol, 10 mol %), L*(0.01 mmol, 12 mol %), phenylacetylene (0.096 mmol, 1.2 equiv), BFEt2O (0.16 mmol, 2.0 equv), base (0.12 mmol, 1.5 equv), CHCl3 (0.3M), −20 °C, 24 h, unless otherwise noted.

[b]

Determined by 1H NMR analysis using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard.

[c]

Determined by HPLC analysis using a chiral stationary phase.

[d]

TMSOTf (1.2 equiv) replaced BF-Et2O.

[e]

Et2O instead of CHCl3.

[f]

CuSPh instead of Cu(MeCN)4PF6.

[g]

MTBD (1.55 equiv), CHCl3 (0.15 M).

[h]

4 °C.