Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Ecol Appl. 2014 Dec 1;24(8):2063–2077. doi: 10.1890/14-0255.1

Table 2.

Indicators of ecosystem functioning (total ecosystem carbon, TEC), structure (rumple index, RI [see Materials and methods: Study design and analysis]), and composition (presence of late seral species, LSS) for different initial legacy level (L0–L2) and subsequent fire frequency scenarios (F0–F2).

Legacy and fire frequency Years 1–100 Years 401–500 Years 1–500
Functioning, TEC (Mg C/ha)
 L0
  F0 316.3ab 745.5ab 568.0abdefgh
  F1 307.5b (290.9–315.7) 663.7a (571.6–727.1) 518.6b (457.2–558.2)
  F2 272.6a (253.3–286.2) 588.9bc (508.5–667.0) 466.8c (406.1–522.4)
 L1
  F0 428.2cde 743.9ab 614.3degh
  F1 411.4c (381.2–426.7) 642.4a (531.1–724.3) 548.0egh (474.6–599.5)
  F2 401.5c (363.0–424.0) 556.4c (475.8–671.4) 490.7f (417.6–556.5)
 L2
  F0 467.8de 733.1ab 621.5gh
  F1 450.3d (419.5–466.7) 631.6ab (535.3–709.7) 559.1h (494.6–605.4)
  F2 437.0e (400.4–460.9) 553.3c (456.2–656.9) 494.4af (414.4–560.5)
Structure, RI (dimensionless)
 L0
  F0 1.04a 2.31a 1.53a
  F1 1.07a (1.04–1.13) 2.89bc (2.59–3.33) 1.88a (1.66–2.22)
  F2 1.10a (1.05–1.17) 3.34d (3.08–3.67) 2.21b (1.95–2.50)
 L1
  F0 1.23ab 2.38ac 1.74a
  F1 1.30b (1.23–1.43) 3.01b (2.71–3.38) 2.15b (1.90–2.46)
  F2 1.34b (1.24–1.52) 3.32d (2.99–3.63) 2.38c (2.12–2.67)
 L2
  F0 1.36bcd 2.46ace 1.89ab
  F1 1.43c (1.35–1.57) 2.96be (2.65–3.24) 2.18b (1.99–2.42)
  F2 1.50d (1.38–1.66) 3.26d (2.98–3.60) 2.46c (2.21–2.75)
Composition, LSS (%)
 L0
  F0 8.6a 82.5abcdef 49.4abe
  F1 7.8a (4.9–9.6) 70.2be (57.0–78.9) 40.8b (31.4–47.6)
  F2 8.1a (5.0–10.3) 56.0c (45.4–67.6) 33.4c (24.7–41.9)
 L1
  F0 32.6bc 99.4abdef 74.8df
  F1 30.5b (27.0–33.4) 87.8df (74.7–96.0) 63.5ef (52.9–72.0)
  F2 28.9b (21.8–32.8) 70.8e (53.4–86.2) 52.0g (37.8–63.5)
 L2
  F0 42.7de 99.5abdef 78.3df
  F1 40.9d (37.6–43.4) 90.2f (80.9–97.1) 70.3d (60.9–76.7)
  F2 39.5ce (35.0–43.1) 73.1abe (50.6–89.4) 58.2a (43.2–70.4)

Notes: See Table 1 for scenario details. Values are landscape-scale means and, for scenarios F1 and F2, mean values over 25 replicated simulations are reported (5th–95th percentile range in parenthesis). Different superscript letters indicate statistical difference between scenarios within the respective time periods at α = 0.05 as determined by Tukey’s honest significant difference method.