. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 4.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2014 Sep 22;28(6):897–907. doi: 10.1037/fam0000028

Table 2.

Positive Work-to-Family Spillover: Results of Multilevel Models Linking Mothers’ Work Experiences to Youth’s Report of Mothers’ Mood after Work

	Youth Report of Mothers’ Positive Affect after Work	Youth Report of Mothers’ Negative Affect after Work
	Estimate (SE)	Estimate (SE)
Fixed effects
Intercept	3.00 (.10)^***	1.53 (.06)^***
Youth age	−0.06 (.02)^*	.01 (.02)
Youth gender^b	−0.20 (.10)^*	.01 (.07)
Mother education^c	0.24 (.07)^***	−.04 (.05)
Day in study^d	−0.02 (.01)	−.01 (.01)
BP positive work experiences^a	0.08 (.19)	−.33 (.13)^*
WP positive work experiences	0.08 (.08)	.03 (.05)
BP negative work experiences^a	−0.05 (.19)	.27 (.13)^*
WP negative work experiences	−0.27 (.08)^***	.08 (.04)^t
Random effects
Intercept	0.22 (.04)^***	.12 (.02)^***
Residual	0.32 (.03)^***	.10 (.01)^***

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001,

p < .10

Note. Youth’s reports of mothers’ positive and negative moods after work were entered as separate dependent variables. Youth age, gender, mother education, day in study, and negative work experiences were entered as covariates in the models. All between-person predictors (BP = between-person) were centered around the sample mean.

Positive/negative experiences at work were coded as yes (1) or no (0).

Youth gender was coded as female (0) or male (1).

Mother’s education was coded as 1 = Completed grade 1 through 8 to 5 = College Graduate.

Day in study was coded as 0=Day 1 to 7 = Day 7.