Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 4;11(4):e0152964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152964

Table 6. Summary of results on the test datasets TEST30ION, TEST30VLG, and TEST60VGS.

Dataset Prediction outcome Method Fmeasure MCC Accuracy Q4
TEST30ION Ion-channel vs. non-ion channel VGIchan 63.0 0.49 72.7 NA
Lin et al. 2011 81.7 0.63 80.8 NA
BLAST 64.3 0.56 74.7 NA
PSIONplus 85.4 0.71 85.4 NA
Confidence interval of PSIONplus 86.0(±3.7) 0.73(±0.07) 86.3(±3.3) NA
TEST30VLG Voltage-gated vs. ligand-gated Lin et al. 2011 76.6 -0.06 63.3 NA
BLAST 77.6 0.23 68.3 NA
PSIONplus 77.6 0.23 68.3 NA
Confidence interval of PSIONplus 78.1(±6.1) 0.22(±0.15) 68.7(±7.4) NA
TEST60VGS Potassium Lin et al. 2011 87.6 0.74 86.6 NA
BLAST 91.6 0.83 90.8 NA
PSIONplus 94.8 0.90 94.6 NA
Anion Lin et al. 2011 86.7 0.85 95.4 NA
BLAST 86.7 0.85 95.4 NA
PSIONplus 88.1 0.87 95.8 NA
Calcium Lin et al. 2011 73.7 0.67 89.5 NA
BLAST 91.1 0.90 96.7 NA
PSIONplus 92.0 0.90 96.7 NA
Sodium Lin et al. 2011 90.5 0.90 98.3 NA
BLAST 93.0 0.93 98.7 NA
PSIONplus 93.0 0.93 98.7 NA
Average over Lin et al. 2011 84.6 0.79 92.4 84.9
all subtypes BLAST 90.6 0.88 95.4 90.8
PSIONplus 92.0 0.90 96.4 92.9
Confidence interval of PSIONplus 91.9(±2.1) 0.90(±0.03) 96.4(±0.9) 92.9(±1.7)

Results of PSIONplus are compared with VGIchan on the TEST30VLG dataset, and with the method by Lin et al. and BLAST on all datasets. Best MCC, Fmeasure and accuracy values for each dataset are shown in bold. Confidence intervals are obtained by computing average and standard deviations (shown in brackets) of 10 repetition of the test where in each repetition we randomly select 50% of test data set. NA means “not applicable”; for the two-class classification the Q4 equals accuracy.