Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;25:407–419. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0740-2

Table 3.

Endorsement frequencies for DISCO items identified in Table 2

Item description % Score = 0 (marked) % Score = 1 (minor) % Score = 2 (unaffected) % Missing/un-rateable
Anxiety 52.9 25.5 21.6 0
One-sided social approaches 44.4 34 7.8 13.7
Temper tantrums 35.3 30.7 33.3 0.7
Changeable mood 34 27.5 38.6 0
Lack of co-operation 33.3 34 32 0.7
Blaming other people* 33.3 18.3 45.8 2.6
Embarrassing remarks in public 30.7 28.1 33.3 7.8
Apparently manipulative behaviour* 27.5 24.2 47.7 0.7
Awareness of own identity* 26.8 24.8 47.1 1.3
Behaviour in public places 21.6 29.4 49 0
Difficulties with other people 16.3 14.4 67.3 2
Repetitive acting out roles* 15 11.8 20.3 52.9
Fantasising, lying, cheating, stealing* 13.7 17 67.3 2
Inappropriate sociability (rapid, inexplicable changes from loving to aggression)* 13.1 18.3 46.4 22.2
Using age peers as mechanical aids, bossy and domineering* 7.8 10.5 80.4 1.3
Socially shocking behaviour* 7.8 7.2 84.3 0.7
Harassment of others 7.2 10.5 80.4 2

Items that were included in Wing and Gould’s draft 15-item PDA list are designated with an asterisk. Items are sorted from most to least commonly rated as ‘marked difficulties’ within the sample (N = 153). The 11 DISCO PDA items deemed most useful in identifying PDA are shown in bold. Two items included in this list had specific scoring rules. ‘Repetitive acting out roles’ was only scored in the clear presence of some degree of apparent imaginative activities (rated across two separate DISCO items), and was un-rateable for over 50 % of the sample. ‘Inappropriate sociability (rapid, inexplicable changes from loving to aggression)’ was only rateable in the presence of interactions with peers, coded in a separate item