Table 3.
Average values of selected diagnostic (DRs) ratios for DEP
| Diagnostic ratio | Value | References |
|---|---|---|
| Ph/(Ph+An) | 0.65 (0.42–0.90) | This studya |
| 0.51 (0.30–0.72) | This studyb | |
| 0.75 | Kavouras et al. (2001) | |
| 0.65 | Alves et al. (2001) | |
| F/(F+Pyr) | 0.63 (0.30–0.94) | This studya |
| 0.31 (0.13–0.40) | This studyb | |
| An/(An+Ph) | 0.34 (0.10–0.51) | This studya |
| 0.38 (0.28–0.47) | This studyb | |
| 0.43 | Kuo et al. (2013) | |
| Fl/(Fl+Pyr) | 0.56 (0.23–0.69) | This studya |
| 0.63 (0.57–0.66) | This studyb | |
| >0.5 | Rogge et al. (1993); Mandalakis et al. (2002); Fang et al. (2004) | |
| 0.60–0.70 | Kavouras et al. (2001) | |
| 0.41 | Kavouras et al. (2001); Kuo et al. (2013) | |
| Fl/Pyr | 1.73 (1.24–2.28) | This studya |
| 1.74 (1.31–1.96) | This studyb | |
| Ph/An | 1.83 (1.32–2.32) | This studya |
| 1.73 (1.11–2.61) | This studyb | |
| BaP/(BaP+Ch) | 0.47 (0.22–0.86) | This studya |
| 0.61 (0.33–0.79) | This studyb | |
| 0.68 | Khalili et al. (1995) | |
| 0.5 | Ravindra et al. (2006) | |
| BaA/BaP | 0.75 (0.45–1.17 | This studya |
| 0.96 (0.80–1.21) | This studyb | |
| 1.0 | Li and Kamens (1993) | |
| Pyr/BaP | 0.66 (0.28–1.11) | This studya |
| 0.42 (0.32–0.75) | This studyb | |
| BaA/(BaA+Ch) | 0.73 (0.62–0.95) | This studya |
| 0.61 (0.32–0.75) | This studyb | |
| 0.38–0.64 | Kavouras et al. (2001) | |
| 0.23–0.89 | Yang et al. (1998) | |
| 0.22–0.55 | Simcik et al. (1999) | |
| 0.30 | Kuo et al. (2013) | |
| IP/(IP+BghiP) | 0.35–0.70 | Kavouras et al. (1999); Ravindra et al. (2006) |
| BbF/BkF | >0.5 | Pandey et al. (1999); Park et al. (2002) |
| 2.32 | Ravindra et al. (2008) | |
| IP/BghiP | >1 | Caricchia et al. (1999) |
| 1 | Kavouras et al. (1999) | |
| Pyr/BaP | >10 | Oda et al. (2001) |
aOnly petrogenic compounds found
bPetrogenic and biogenic compounds present