Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJS. 2016 Jan;121(4):1168–1222. doi: 10.1086/684137

Table B.4.

Weighted Treatment Distribution at Childhood and Adolescence by Prior Family Income

n row cell Childhood
Adolescence
NH disadvantage quintile NH disadvantage quintile
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Family income-to-needs ratio >2 482 381 287 252 115 818 625 481 317 158
.32 .25 .19 .17 .08 .34 .26 .20 .13 .07
.08 .06 .05 .04 .02 .13 .10 .08 .05 .03
(1,2] 194 356 520 468 281 200 306 449 378 264
.11 .20 .29 .26 .15 .13 .19 .28 .24 .17
.03 .06 .08 .08 .05 .03 .05 .07 .06 .04
[0,1] 113 233 521 627 501 75 190 329 391 428
.06 .12 .26 .31 .25 .05 .13 .23 .28 .30
.02 .04 .08 .10 .08 .01 .03 .05 .06 .07
<0 15 50 83 190 465 20 37 86 182 401
.02 .06 .10 .24 .58 .03 .05 .12 .25 .55
.00 .01 .01 .03 .8 .00 .01 .01 .03 .07

Notes: Results are weighted to adjust for oversampling of low-income families in the PSID and combined across 100 multiple imputation datasets. Income-to-needs ratio is centered around 1 such that values less than zero represent sub-poverty incomes, values equal to 0 represent poverty-level incomes, and values greater than 0 represent incomes above the poverty line.