Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJS. 2016 Jan;121(4):1168–1222. doi: 10.1086/684137

Table E.2.

Regression-with-residuals Estimates Under Different Methods of Adjusting for Missing Data

Model MI (base)
MID
SI
CC
coef se coef se coef se coef se
Intercept .884 (.021) *** .906 (.018) *** .904 (.015) *** .889 (.016) ***
Childhood
    NH dadvg –.005 (.011) –.008 (.012) –.009 (.008) –.008 (.013)
    NH dadvg × inc-to-needs .005 (.004) .007 (.005) .005 (.003) .008 (.005)
Adolesence
    NH dadvg –.041 (.010) *** –.040 (.010) *** –.041 (.007) *** –.053 (.012) ***
    NH dadvg × inc-to-needs .012 (.003) *** .011 (.004) ** .011 (.002) *** .013 (.004) ***
Description
    Num. of observations 6137 3501 6137 1891
    Num. of replications 100 100 1 0

Notes: MI = multiple imputation, MID = multiple imputation then deletion, SI = single imputation, and CC = complete case analysis. Standard errors are based on 1000 bootstrap samples.

*p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01, and

***

p < 0.001 for two-sided tests of no effect.