Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2016 Apr;40(4):906–915. doi: 10.1111/acer.13027

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Depicts the mean (+ SEM) responses on the EtOH lever during relapse conditions influenced by the presences of conditioned cues. * indicates that the CS+ > No Cue and CS0 > CS-, and CS+ group responded more, while the CS- group responded less, than baseline. (x0005E) indicates that the CS- group did not respond more than baseline and was significantly lower compared to all other groups. # indicates that the CS+ > No Cue, CS0 and CS-, and CS+ and No Cue groups responded more than baseline. + indicates that the CS+ > No Cue, CS- and CS0 , and CS+ group responded more than baseline.