Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 5;15:70. doi: 10.1186/s12944-016-0239-y

Table 2.

Logistic regression analysis of associations between lipids and type 2 diabetes

Odds ratio (OR) (95 % CI) Sensitivity analysesd
SD Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Odds ratio (95 % CI)
LDL-C (mmol/L) 0.6086 1.57(1.45–1.70) 1.21(1.10–1.33) 1.14(1.04–1.25) 1.21(1.03–1.43)
HDL-C (mmol/L) 0.2696 0.68(0.61–0.75) 0.68(0.61–0.76) 0.74(0.66–0.83) 0.66(0.54–0.81)
TG (mmol/L)e 0.5976 1.68(1.56–1.82) 1.49(1.36–1.63) 1.38(1.25–1.53) 1.55(1.31–1.84)
TC (mmol/L) 0.8792 1.50(1.39–1.63) 1.18(1.08–1.29) 1.13(1.03–1.24) 1.18(1.00–1.38)
Non-HDL-C (mmol/L) 0.8595 1.66(1.54–1.80) 1.31(1.20–1.44) 1.23(1.12–1.35) 1.32(1.12–1.55)
TG/HDL-Cf 0.7256 1.71(1.58–1.85) 1.56(1.42–1.72) 1.45(1.31–1.60) 1.64(1.38–1.96)
TC/HDL-C 1.0356 1.70(1.57–1.83) 1.52(1.39–1.66) 1.42(1.30–1.57) 1.59(1.37–1.85)

Odds ratio (OR) (95 % CI) per 1 SD change. HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, Non-HDL-C non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, SD standard deviation, TC total cholesterol, TG triglycerides

aUnadjusted

bAdjusted for age, sex, marital status, personal monthly income level, education level, smoking, drinking, physical activity, and hypertension

cAdditionally adjusted for BMI

dAdjusted for model 3 and further excluded individuals with hypertension

eLog-transformed TG used

fLog-transformed TG/HDL-C used