Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Behav. 2016 Jan;48(1):230–245. doi: 10.1177/0013916515614366

Table 2.

Survey respondent characteristics and measures

Park Users N=1445 Household Respondents N=1592 p-value
Respondent Demographics
% Male 48.6 37.7 <0.01
Age group (%)
18–29 20.6 19.3 0.18
30–39 36.4 22.3 0.21
40–49 20.9 21.6 <.01
50–59 13.1 23.1 <.01
≥60 9.0 13.8 <.01
Self-Reported Race/Ethnicity
% African American 6.1 10.1 <0.01
% Hispanic 87.5 73.3 <0.01
% Non-Hispanic White 3.4 10.2 <0.01
% Asian 1.6 1.2 0.35
% Other race or ethnicity 1.4 5.2 <0.01
Education
% Less than High School 35.1 30.4 <0.01
% High School Graduate/GED 41.1 34.9 <0.01
% Greater than High School 23.9 34.8 <0.01
Respondent Park Use and Perceptions
% using park once a week or more 83.3 29.1 <0.01
# days of park use in the past week 2.8 0.9 <0.01
# weekly exercise sessions 2.5 2.3 0.03
Duration of usual exercise session (minutes) 23.1 21.0 <0.01
% Self-rated health (good to excellent) 81.9 78.1 <0.01
% saying park is safe or very safe 86.3 78.3 <0.01
Average perception of neighborhood safety (scale 1–4—higher is safer) 2.9 2.9 0.97
Social cohesion and trust (scale 1–5; higher is more trust) 3.0 3.0 0.33
Informal social control (scale 1–5; higher more control) 3.0 2.9 <0.01
Mental health (Kessler-6) (scale 1–5; higher better mental health) 4.6 4.6 0.70