Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;9:1857–1863. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S100629

Table 4.

A comparison of the parameters for treatment planning based on the three different CT images

Parameter EI-EE
EI-3DCT
EE-3DCT
z P-value z P-value z P-value
Ipsilateral normal breast
Dmean −1.326 0.185 −2.390 0.017 −2.354 0.019
V20 −0.635 0.526 −3.062 0.002 −2.277 0.023
V30 −1.008 0.313 −2.837 0.005 −2.837 0.005
Ipsilateral lungs
Dmean −0.342 0.732 −2.499 0.014 −2.297 0.022
V5 −1.232 0.218 −3.211 0.001 −2.259 0.024
V10 −1.248 0.212 −3.285 0.001 −2.173 0.030
V20 −0.101 0.920 −1.993 0.046 −2.634 0.008
Heart
Dmean −0.971 0.322 −2.547 0.011 −2.807 0.005
V5 −0.507 0.612 −2.521 0.012 −2.100 0.036
V10 −0.676 0.499 −2.366 0.018 −2.197 0.028

Notes: Data format is median (minimum – maximum) as calculated by SPSS 19.0 software. P-value was calculated by Wilcoxon-signed-ranks test.

Abbreviations: 3DCT, three-dimensional computed tomography; EI, end inhalation; EE, end exhalation; Dmean, mean dose (Gy); V5, volume that received ≥5 Gy; V10, volume that received ≥10 Gy; V20, volume that received ≥20 Gy; V30, volume that received ≥30 Gy.