Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 5;13(4):e1001987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001987

Table 6. Risk estimates from meta-analyses: comparison of original estimates with post-assessment estimates for the systematic review by Loke et al. [17].

Outcome Original Effect Estimate (95% CI) Post-Assessment Effect Estimate (95% CI)
n Cohort Studies Case–Control Studies Overall n Cohort Studies Case–Control Studies Overall
Analysis A
Myocardial infarction 15 1.16 (1.05–1.28) 1.15 (1.04–1.27) 1.16 (1.07–1.24) 10 1.10 (1.02–1.20) 1.21 (1.01–1.45) 1.12 (1.04–1.20)
Heart failure 8 1.22 (1.15–1.29) 1.39 (1.21–1.60) 1.24 (1.16–1.31) 6 1.21 (1.15–1.27) No change 1.21 (1.14–1.30)
Overall mortality 8 1.14 (1.09–1.20) 1.13 (0.92–1.39) 1.14 (1.09–1.20) 6 No change No change No change
Analysis B
Myocardial infarction 15 1.16 (1.05–1.28) 1.15 (1.04–1.27) 1.16 (1.07–1.24) 6 1.06 (0.99–1.13) 1.00 (0.67–1.49) 1.06 (0.99–1.13)
Heart failure 8 1.22 (1.15–1.29) 1.39 (1.21–1.60) 1.22 (1.14–1.31) 4 1.22 (1.16–1.28) N/A 1.22 (1.16–1.28)
Overall mortality 8 1.14 (1.09–1.20) 1.13 (0.92–1.39) 1.14 (1.09–1.20) 4 1.13 (1.08–1.20) N/A 1.13 (1.08–1.20)

Analysis A: studies judged to have serious or critical overall RoB were excluded; analysis B: studies scoring moderate, serious, or critical RoB were excluded; n: number of studies included.

N/A, not applicable.