Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;39:696–704. doi: 10.1007/s00270-016-1310-9

Table 1.

Overview of studies comparing complication rates between patients in whom hepaticoenteric arteries were embolized or not

Author Artery Indication for embolization n Embolized n (%) Imaging post treatment Complications Not embolized n (%)b Imaging post treatment Complications Risk difference (95 % CI)e
Daghir [13] GDA Antegrade flow in GDA and injection position close to GDA. Other arteries, including the RGA, were also embolized 82 71 (87)c NR 2 (3 %) duodenal ulceration
1 (1 %) prepyloric ulceration and bleeding
11 (13) NR 0 +3 %
(−29 to 11)
+1 %
(−31 to 9 %)
Cosin [12] RGA If visible on angiography and in or close to vascular territory or uptake of 99mTc-MAA 27 9 (33) NR 0 18 (67) NR 0 0 %
(−22 to 37 %)
Hamouia [11] RGA or GDA Injection proximal to GDA or RGA 134 42 (31) NR NR 92 (69) NR 2 (1 %) gastrointestinal ulcersd NA
Theysohn [14] Cystic artery Increased 99mTc-MAA accumulation in the gallbladder wall 295 20 (10) NR 1 (5 %) clinical signs of cholecystitisd 275 (93) NR 0 +5 %
(0 to 46 %)
Powerski [15] Cystic artery If it could be entered swiftly with the wire/catheter 105 68 (65) 3.3 % uptake in gallbladder wall 22 % pain in upper right quadrant
2 (3 %) cholecystitis
37 (35) 8.8 % uptake in gallbladder wall 10 % pain in upper right quadrant
1 (3 %) cholecystitis
+12 %
(NA)
0 %
(−13 to 9 %)
Ahmadzadehfar [18] Falciform artery NR 17 1 (6) 0 NR 16 (94) 9 (56 %) uptake in abdominal wall 1 (6 %) abdominal muscle pain NA
Schelhorn [16] Falciform artery If technically possible 11 5 (45) NR 0 6 (55) NR 0 0 %
(−48 to 54 %)
Paprottka [17] NR If catheter could not be placed distally with sufficient safety margin (even if no 99mTc-MAA uptake was present) 566 240 (42) NR 31 (13 %) CTCAE ≥3 within 7 days
3 (1 %) CTCAE ≥3 within 6 months
326 (58) NR 14 (4 %) CTCAE ≥ 3 within 7 days
3 (1 %) CTCAE ≥ 3 within 6 months
+9 %
(4 to 14 %)
0 %
(−2 to 3 %)

CI confidence interval, RGA right gastric artery, GDA gastroduodenal artery, NR not reported, NA not applicable

aLetter to the editor

bRelates to the specific artery, others arteries may be embolized

cNot only GDA was embolized, also RGA, cystic and hepatic arteries

dHealed after conservative therapy

eRisk difference was calculated for the incidence of complications in the embolized group compared to the non-embolized group, i.e. a positive risk difference indicates more complications occurred in the embolized group and vice versa (Wilson procedure with continuity correction)