Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2015 Aug 26;60:615–627. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-1053-3

Review: advances in in situ and satellite phenological observations in Japan

Shin Nagai 1,, Kenlo Nishida Nasahara 2, Tomoharu Inoue 1, Taku M Saitoh 3, Rikie Suzuki 1
PMCID: PMC4821867  PMID: 26307639

Abstract

To accurately evaluate the responses of spatial and temporal variation of ecosystem functioning (evapotranspiration and photosynthesis) and services (regulating and cultural services) to the rapid changes caused by global warming, we depend on long-term, continuous, near-surface, and satellite remote sensing of phenology over wide areas. Here, we review such phenological studies in Japan and discuss our current knowledge, problems, and future developments. In contrast with North America and Europe, Japan has been able to evaluate plant phenology along vertical and horizontal gradients within a narrow area because of the country’s high topographic relief. Phenological observation networks that support scientific studies and outreach activities have used near-surface tools such as digital cameras and spectral radiometers. Differences in phenology among ecosystems and tree species have been detected by analyzing the seasonal variation of red, green, and blue digital numbers (RGB values) extracted from phenological images, as well as spectral reflectance and vegetation indices. The relationships between seasonal variations in RGB-derived indices or spectral characteristics and the ecological and CO2 flux measurement data have been well validated. In contrast, insufficient satellite remote-sensing observations have been conducted because of the coarse spatial resolution of previous datasets, which could not detect the heterogeneous plant phenology that results from Japan’s complex topography and vegetation. To improve Japanese phenological observations, multidisciplinary analysis and evaluation will be needed to link traditional phenological observations with “index trees,” near-surface and satellite remote-sensing observations, “citizen science” (observations by citizens), and results published on the Internet.

Keywords: Remote sensing, Phenology, Japan, Phenological observation network, Biometeorology

Introduction

To accurately evaluate changes in the spatial and temporal variation of ecosystem functioning (e.g., evapotranspiration, photosynthesis) and services (e.g., regulating, cultural) under the rapid climate changes that are occurring due to global warming, long-term, continuous, and broad-scale phenological observations are required (Richardson et al. 2013). The spatial and temporal variations of the timing of leaf flush and leaf fall affect biogeochemical processes such as CO2 uptake during photosynthesis and the emission of biogenic volatile organic compounds (Peñuelas et al. 2009; Polgar and Primack 2011; Keenan et al. 2014) and carbon, water, and heat budgets through the effects on evapotranspiration and physical properties such as latent and sensible heat, albedo, and the aerodynamic roughness of the land surface (Peñuelas et al. 2009; Polgar and Primack 2011; Schwartz et al. 2013). A phenological mismatch between plants and their animal pollinators and consumers may increase the risk of losses of biodiversity and supporting services (SCBD 2010; Polgar and Primack 2011; Kudo 2014). Under the future warming that is predicted to occur, the time lag between the blossoming date of species such as cherry (Prunus spp.) and the dates of associated festivals may disrupt tourism activities. To prevent the loss of cultural services such as flower tourism, decision-makers must develop adaptation plans (Sparks 2014).

Many previous studies examined the spatial and temporal variation of phenology based on fixed-point visual observations of “index trees” by experts (Linderholm 2006; Ogawa-Onishi and Berry 2013). Such observations have the merit of permitting long-term detailed phenological records. However, this method is labor-intensive (Richardson et al. 2007), the detection of phenological stages is subjective, the numbers of species and individuals that can be surveyed are limited, the observations fail to cover the full range of the species (they are mainly distributed in cities and low-altitude areas), and the observations may be affected by urbanization (e.g., the heat island effect; Ohashi et al. 2012). To solve these problems, we can take advantage of in situ (near-surface) and satellite remote sensing, which permit more objective, long-term, continuous phenological observations of many individuals over a wide area (Linderholm 2006; Morisette et al. 2009).

Long-term continuous phenological observations with digital cameras and spectral radiometers have been conducted since around 2003 for a range of ecosystems, mainly by American and Japanese networks. In the USA, this has been done by the PhenoCam network (http://phenocam.sr.unh.edu/webcam/. Accessed 12 August 2015; Richardson et al. 2007); in Japan, it has been done by the Phenological Eyes Network (PEN; http://www.pheno-eye.org. Accessed 12 August 2015; Nasahara and Nagai 2015). However, these observations cover a limited area. Satellite remote sensing of vegetation indices, such as the data from the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) sensor onboard National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) satellites since 1981, can detect the spatial and temporal variation of phenology at large scales (Delbart et al. 2006; Buitenwerf et al. 2015). Furthermore, the Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites have provided phenological data since 2000, and the VEGETATION sensor onboard the Satellite Pour l’Observation de la Terre (SPOT) have provided data since 1999 at point, regional, and continental scales, with a resolution of 500 to 1000 m (Delbart et al. 2006; Nagai et al. 2015b).

Japan includes subarctic to subtropical zones, and 70 % of the land is mountainous. The mountainous region in central Japan ranges widely in altitude (by 2000 to 3000 m) over relatively short distances (50 km). Japan’s maritime climate is strongly influenced by global atmospheric patterns such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation and the Arctic Oscillation (JMA 2014). These geographical characteristics create large regional differences and diversity and high spatial variation of vegetation (Natural Environmental Information GIS 1999). For this reason, we require not only phenological observations based on index trees but also quantitative satellite data that cover many ecosystems and plant species over a wide area, with low labor costs, to obtain and process the data.

In this review, we describe plant phenological observations in Japan based on remote sensing and discuss our current knowledge, problems, and future developments based on these studies. The geography of Japan allows for evaluation of the spatial and temporal variation of plant phenology along vertical (altitude) and horizontal (latitude) gradients over short distances (Doi and Takahashi 2008; Matsumoto 2010; Nagai et al. 2015b). Nagai et al. (2015b) found that the spatial and temporal variations of the timing of the start and end of the deciduous forest’s growing season were strongly affected by both vertical and horizontal gradients. In addition, the Japanese Ministry of the Environment, Forestry Agency and other organizations have surveyed the vegetation cover and forest structure throughout the country for many years (Natural Environmental Information GIS 1999). This geographical and social background suggests the possibility of taking advantage of a large body of evidence to accurately evaluate the spatial and temporal variation of plant phenology. In this review, we will not discuss previous agricultural and horticultural studies because the effects of human manipulations may conceal the effects of climate change.

Background for Japanese phenological observations

The dramatic lifestyle changes since World War II (rapid urbanization) drastically reduced opportunities to experience nature. However, citizens continue to enjoy viewing of spring cherry blossoms (hanami; Aono and Kazui 2008), which has been recorded since the ninth century AD, and maple leaves (Acer spp.) in autumn (momiji-gari; Aono and Tani 2014), which has been recorded since the tenth century AD, because these activities are part of Japan’s traditional culture. Recently, meteorological and tourist services, city offices, and tourist associations have published phenological information such as flowering and leaf coloring dates at scenic spots, resorts, temples, shrines, and parks on their Web sites. The Internet has dramatically increased the availability of such phenological information (Nagai et al. 2015a). Social networks such as Twitter and Facebook also let citizens share phenological information.

To find and experience these seasonal changes, citizens travel to scenic spots to view flowers and leaf coloring. Although technological crop cultivation (e.g., in greenhouses) and imported foods have undermined the sense of seasonality, citizens nonetheless receive nature’s bounty (supporting ecosystem services) by purchasing seasonal vegetables and fruits. Seasonal events such as the timing of flowering and appearance of insects and birds have been important in Japanese literature, including classical poetry (waka) and haiku, since ancient times. Japanese citizen scientists have actively conducted phenological observations. “Ikimono Log,” managed by the Biodiversity Center of Japan, is a major system for collecting and sharing biological information (http://ikilog.biodic.go.jp. Accessed 12 August 2015). These cultural, historical, and social backgrounds have created favorable conditions for Japanese phenological observations.

Phenological observations using index trees

In this section, we will briefly summarize previous phenological studies based on observations of index trees. Ogawa-Onishi and Berry (2013) provide detailed descriptions of Japanese studies. Typical data include the timing of flowering, leaf flush, leaf coloring, and leaf fall that have been published by meteorological agencies (Matsumoto et al. 2003; Doi and Takahashi 2008; Ibáñez et al. 2010; Matsumoto 2010). This dataset has been compiled at weather stations throughout Japan since 1953 (JMA 1985). In addition, long-term continuous observations of these parameters have been conducted at research forests and agricultural experiment stations (Miller-Rushing et al. 2007; Fujisawa and Kobayashi 2010).

Japan stretches more than 3000 km, from 45° N to 20° N and from 123° E to 154° E, and comprises nine climatic divisions (Suzuki 1962). This allows mapping of the spatial characteristics of the timing of flowering, leaf flush, leaf coloring, and leaf fall in each season and examination of the changes in timing in response to climate change (JMA 1985). By way of example, Fig. 1 shows the spatial distribution of the first flowering date of cherry (Prunus × yedoensis; somei-yoshino) in 2014, and Table 1 provides details of these data. Global warming has advanced blooming of this cherry by 5 days from 1953 to 2013 (JMA 2014) and leaf coloring of Ginkgo biloba by 4 days from 1953 to 2000 (Matsumoto et al. 2003), but has delayed leaf coloring of Acer palmatum by 18 days from 1953 to 2013 (JMA 2014) and leaf fall of G. biloba by 8 days from 1953 to 2000 (Matsumoto et al. 2003). Unlike the case in North America and Europe, Japan’s delay in autumn phenology has been clearer than the advance in spring phenology (Matsumoto et al. 2003; Ibáñez et al. 2010; Matsumoto 2010).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Spatial distribution of the first flowering date (day of year) of cherry (Prunus × yedoensis) in 2014. Data obtained nearby the 58 weather stations conducted by the Japan Meteorological Agency were published on the Internet. See Table 1 for details. DOY day of year

Table 1.

Summary of the first flowering date (day of year, DOY) of cherry (Prunus × yedoensis; somei-yoshino) near 58 weather stations based on data published on the Web site of the Japan Meteorological Agency

Site name Latitude (°N) Longitude (°E) Annual mean air temperature (°)a Mean annual precipitation (mm)a DOY Substitute species
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Normala
Wakkanai 45.4150 141.6783 6.8 1062.8 139 135 146 131 123 134 Prunus sargentii
Asahikawa 43.7567 142.3717 6.8 1042.1 129 123 138 122 117 125 Prunus sargentii
Abashiri 44.0167 144.2783 6.5 787.5 136 124 145 127 120 131 Prunus sargentii
Sapporo 43.0600 141.3283 8.9 1106.6 127 122 133 119 112 123
Obihiro 42.9217 143.2117 6.8 887.8 123 126 130 117 116 124 Prunus sargentii
Kushiro 42.9850 144.3767 6.2 1042.9 138 138 143 132 126 137 Prunus sargentii
Muroran 42.3117 140.9750 8.6 1184.9 126 130 136 119 118 126
Hakodate 41.8167 140.7533 9.1 1151.9 122 123 128 118 111 120
Aomori 40.8217 140.7683 10.4 1300.2 115 120 119 112 104 114
Akita 39.7167 140.0983 11.7 1686.6 113 115 113 110 101 108
Morioka 39.6983 141.1650 10.2 1266.2 110 115 113 103 99 111
Yamagata 38.2550 140.3450 11.7 1163.2 108 114 105 104 100 105
Sendai 38.2617 140.8967 12.4 1254.2 102 109 99 97 93 101
Fukushima 37.7583 140.4700 13.0 1166.1 102 107 95 98 92 99
Nigata 37.8933 139.0183 13.9 1821.0 104 107 97 97 92 99
Kanazawa 36.5883 136.6333 14.6 2398.9 97 101 89 91 90 94
Toyama 36.7083 137.2017 14.1 2300.1 98 103 88 92 91 95
Nagano 36.6617 138.1917 11.9 932.7 105 109 96 101 94 103
Utsunomiya 36.5483 139.8683 13.8 1493.1 96 99 80 88 89 91
Fukui 36.0550 136.2217 14.5 2237.7 97 101 87 90 90 93
Maebashi 36.4050 139.0600 14.6 1248.5 93 99 81 88 87 90
Kumagaya 36.1500 139.3800 15.0 1286.4 91 95 78 87 86 88
Mito 36.3800 140.4667 13.6 1353.8 96 97 80 88 89 92
Gifu 35.4000 136.7617 15.8 1827.6 87 90 80 83 82 85
Nagoya 35.1667 136.9650 15.8 1535.4 86 90 78 83 80 85
Kofu 35.6667 138.5533 14.7 1135.3 88 92 78 87 84 86
Chōshi 35.7383 140.8567 15.4 1660.0 94 93 80 88 89 90
Tsu 34.7333 136.5183 15.9 1581.3 91 95 84 86 88 89
Shizuoka 34.9750 138.4033 16.6 2325.0 79 84 76 83 81 84
Tokyo 35.6917 139.7500 15.4 1528.8 87 91 75 84 82 85
Yokohama 35.4383 139.6517 15.8 1688.8 89 93 77 84 82 85
Matsue 35.4567 133.0650 14.9 1787.2 96 97 82 86 88 90
Tottori 35.4867 134.2383 14.9 1914.0 92 94 79 86 87 90
Kyoto 35.0133 135.7317 15.9 1491.3 87 94 81 86 86 87
Hikone 35.2750 136.2433 14.7 1570.9 91 99 89 92 90 92
Hiroshima 34.3983 132.4617 16.3 1537.6 91 93 81 84 83 86
Okayama 34.6850 133.9250 16.2 1106.2 90 94 83 87 87 88
Kobe 34.6967 135.2117 16.7 1216.3 90 93 80 86 86 87
Osaka 34.6817 135.5183 16.9 1279.1 90 93 80 86 85 87
Wakayama 34.2283 135.1633 16.6 1317.0 86 90 77 85 82 85
Nara 34.6933 135.8267 14.9 1316.1 90 94 81 86 86 88
Matsuyama 33.8433 132.7767 16.5 1314.9 84 90 76 83 86 84
Takamatsu 34.3167 134.0533 16.3 1082.4 90 93 81 85 83 87
Kochi 33.5667 133.5483 16.9 2547.6 81 81 74 77 81 81
Tokushima 34.0667 134.5733 16.6 1453.9 90 92 83 88 87 87
Shimonoseki 33.9483 130.9250 16.7 1684.5 89 90 78 84 84 86
Fukuoka 33.5817 130.3750 17.0 1612.5 81 87 72 78 81 82
Saga 33.2650 130.3050 16.5 1870.2 81 88 77 78 81 83
Oita 33.2350 131.6183 16.4 1644.7 82 87 73 84 85 83
Nagasaki 32.7333 129.8667 17.2 1857.7 82 86 75 79 81 83
Kumamoto 32.8133 130.7067 16.9 1985.9 80 85 75 79 80 82
Kagoshima 31.5550 130.5467 18.6 2265.7 82 86 74 79 80 85
Miyazaki 31.9383 131.4133 17.4 2508.7 82 84 72 78 81 83
Naze 28.3783 129.4950 21.7 2837.7 30 20 14 16 20 19 Prunus campanulata
Ishigaki-jima 24.3367 124.1633 24.3 2106.8 17 359b 22 16 6 16 Prunus campanulata
Miyako-jima 24.7933 125.2783 23.6 2021.1 17 18 19 16 22 16 Prunus campanulata
Naha 26.2067 127.6867 23.0 2040.9 7 22 362b 15 15 18 Prunus campanulata
Minami-Daito-jima 25.8283 131.2283 23.3 1591.6 24 17 7 7 15 20 Prunus campanulata

The data in this table was obtained from the biometeorological and meteorological observations conducted by the Japan Meteorological Agency (http://www.data.jma.go.jp/sakura/data/sakura003_06.html and http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/menu/menureport.html; in Japanese. Accessed 12 August 2015)

aAverage from 1981 to 2010

bObserved in the preceding year

Japanese phenological observation networks

Recently, automatic fixed-point phenological observations using near-surface remote-sensing techniques such as digital cameras and spectral radiometers have been conducted to support research and outreach activities. Typical networks include the Internet Nature Information System (INIS) in national parks across the country, managed by the Biodiversity Center of Japan (http://www.sizenken.biodic.go.jp. Accessed 12 August 2015; Ide and Oguma 2010), PEN at ecosystem study sites (http://www.pheno-eye.org. Accessed 12 August 2015; Nasahara and Nagai 2015), and Cyberforest, which mainly supports university forest research (http://landscape.nenv.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cyberforest/Welcome.html. Accessed 12 August 2015; Saito et al. 2004). These networks have published daily phenological images on their Web sites. In addition, PEN has conducted automatic fixed-point spectral measurements of the canopy surface in forests and grasslands to provide vegetation index data (Nasahara and Nagai 2015).

The main aims of these systems were to introduce national parks to citizens through outreach activities (Ide and Oguma 2010), permit ground truthing of satellite remote-sensing data (Nasahara and Nagai 2015), and improve environmental education (Saito et al. 2004). INIS targets the landscape scale (200 to 1000 m), whereas PEN and Cyberforest aim for coverage from shoot to landscape scales (20 cm to 200 m; Saito et al. 2004; Ide and Oguma 2010; Nasahara and Nagai 2015). Figure 2 summarizes the locations of the sites in each phenological observation network.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Summary of the locations of the sites in each phenological observation network discussed in the text. The locations of the sites were determined by using Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/. Accessed 12 August 2015), information from each network’s Web site (INIS, http://www.sizenken.biodic.go.jp. Accessed 12 August 2015; PEN, http://www.pheno-eye.org. Accessed 12 August 2015; Cyberforest, http://landscape.nenv.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp/cyberforest/Welcome.html. Accessed 12 August 2015), and the literature (Ueta et al. 2012). INIS Internet Nature Information System, PEN Phenological Eyes Network

Phenological observations by digital cameras and spectral radiometers

Digital cameras

We can detect differences in plant phenological characteristics among ecosystems and tree species by analyzing the temporal variations in the red, green, and blue (RGB) digital numbers extracted from daily digital images (Richardson et al. 2007; Ide and Oguma 2010). These analyses have been conducted by INIS and PEN in various ecosystems (Ide and Oguma 2010; Nasahara and Nagai 2015). At some study sites, continuous daily phenological images exist for more than 10 years. Target ecosystems have been typical Japanese vegetated landscapes. Accordingly, the studies provide ground truthing data for phenological observations obtained by satellite remote sensing. However, some typical vegetation types such as oak (Quercus serrata) and mangrove (Rhizophoraceae spp.) forests have not yet been analyzed. In addition, Cyberforest has not conducted this analysis. Table 2 summarizes the previous studies that have been conducted in each Japanese ecosystem.

Table 2.

Summary of Japanese studies that analyzed RGB values obtained from phenological images

Ecosystem type Phenological network Scale of image target (m) Camera direction References
Deciduous broad-leaved forest PEN, INIS 0.5 to 1000 Downward from towers; sideways from buildings; upward from the ground Ide and Oguma (2010); Nagai et al. (2011a, 2013a, 2013b, 2014b); Inoue et al. (2014)
Deciduous coniferous forest PEN 20 to 200 Downward from towers Ide et al. (2011)
Evergreen broad-leaved forest INIS 1000 Sideways from buildings Ide and Oguma (2010)
Evergreen coniferous forest PEN 20 Downward from tower; upward from the ground Nagai et al. (2013a)
Mixed forests PEN 20 Sideways from building Mizunuma et al. (2011)
Grassland PEN 20 Downward from tower Akitsu et al. (2011)
Wetland INIS 200 Sideways from buildings Ide and Oguma (2010)

PEN Phenological Eyes Network (Nasahara and Nagai 2015), INIS Internet Nature Information System (http://www.sizenken.biodic.go.jp. Accessed 12 August 2015)

The year-to-year variation in the timing of flowering, leaf flush, and leaf fall for the whole canopy and for each tree species in deciduous forests can be detected by analyzing RGB time series (Ide and Oguma 2010; Nagai et al. 2011a; Inoue et al. 2014). The seasonal variation of these values correlates well with that of gross primary production (GPP) in this forest (Saitoh et al. 2012), deciduous coniferous forest (larch (Larix kaempferi) forest; Ide and Oguma 2011), and evergreen coniferous forest (Japanese cedar forest; Saitoh et al. 2012; Nagai et al. 2013a). Nagai et al. (2013a) examined differences between the seasonal variation in RGB-derived indices between a Japanese closed canopy evergreen coniferous forest (Japanese cedar, Cryptomeria japonica) and an Alaskan open canopy evergreen coniferous forest (black spruce, Picea mariana). However, insufficient comparative studies have been conducted in Japan.

Sonnentag et al. (2012) compared the RGB-derived indices extracted from images taken from several types of digital cameras. They found that the seasonal patterns of RGB-derived indices were likely to be more relevant to detecting changes in plant phenology than were particular RGB-derived indices values. This means that the seasonal patterns of the changes in RGB-derived indices could be used to detect phenological transitions without having to account for the characteristics of different types of digital cameras. However, additional examinations of the unique and common characteristics of the seasonal variation of RGB-derived indices are required for Japan and elsewhere.

Very steep terrain, with large altitude changes (e.g., 900 m) over short distances (e.g., 14 km), exists in the mountainous region of central Japan (Muraoka and Koizumi 2009). Nagai et al. (2015b) reported that along a vertical gradient in deciduous forests between 35° N and 46° N, leaf flush began 1 day later per 38.6 to 68.5 m increase in altitude and leaf fall began 1 day earlier per 78.1 to 142.9 m increase. This suggests the possibility that studying a small river basin in steep terrain would let researchers evaluate the sensitivity of plant phenology to climate change using a “space for time substitution,” although more such studies are needed to confirm this. Studies conducted over a wide range of latitudes (horizontal distance) are also required to account for the spatial distribution of tree species and populations, genetic diversity, and phenological plasticity (Doi et al. 2010). However, studies over a wide range of latitudes include more uncertainties because of the greater variation in topographic and environmental characteristics.

In forest ecosystems, digital cameras have generally been installed at the top of CO2 flux or ecosystem observation towers (Richardson et al. 2007; Nasahara and Nagai 2015). Nagai et al. (2013b) found that the seasonal patterns of RGB-derived indices extracted from upward images taken from the forest floor detected canopy phenology almost as well as downward images taken from the top of a tower in a closed canopy deciduous broad-leaved forest. Eliminating the requirement to install towers would allow such studies to be conducted at more sites for the same research budget.

Plant phenology is mainly affected by physiological events such as the onset of flowering or changes of leaf biomass and the amount of leaf pigments (Sims and Gamon 2002); Nagai et al. (2011a) found that RGB-derived indices can sensitively detect these changes based on changes of leaf color during leaf flush (from yellowish to dark green) and leaf coloring (from yellowish green to yellow or red). This seasonal variation can also be detected by spectral reflectance data and vegetation indices measured by spectral radiometers. In particular, the green–red vegetation index (GRVI), which is based on the visible red and green reflectance bands, was better able to detect the canopy surface color changes than the normalized-difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the enhanced vegetation index (EVI), which are based on the visible red and blue and near-infrared reflectance bands (Motohka et al. 2010; Ide and Oguma 2011; Nagai et al. 2014a).

However, automatic fixed-point observations that target the whole canopy using spectral radiometers cannot detect differences in the seasonal changes among tree species. Nakaji et al. (2011) found that the seasonal variation in phenology of each deciduous broad-leaved tree species could be detected by measurements with a three-band multispectral camera. Saitoh et al. (2012) found that the seasonal variation in whole canopy RGB-derived indices was well correlated with that of spectral reflectance and the associated vegetation indices in deciduous broad-leaved and evergreen coniferous (Japanese cedar) forests. This suggests that RGB-derived indices for each tree or species may be a proxy for spectral reflectance values and vegetation indices (Ide and Oguma 2011). Noda et al. (2015a) measured the spectral reflectance values of various deciduous and evergreen tree species at the scale of individual leaves. However, it would be prohibitively difficult to perform such observations for multiple tree species and individuals at multiple points because of the high cost of the instruments and the labor-intensive analysis. Further examinations of the relationship between RGB-derived indices and spectral characteristics for a range of tree species will be required to confirm that RGB-derived indices can be used as proxies for spectral reflectance and vegetation indices. In addition, examination of the relationships between seasonal variation of RGB-derived indices, leaf traits, and ecophysiological parameters for various tree species (Noda et al. 2015b) would provide useful direct evidence for analysis of GPP values (Ide and Oguma 2011).

Digital cameras can capture phenological observations at shoot, canopy, and landscape scales. However, the long distance between the camera and the target vegetation that is required to cover larger areas may prevent detailed phenological observations. Nagai et al. (2014b) found that the year-to-year variation in the timing of full blooming of Prunus sargentii could be detected at a canopy scale, but detailed continuous flowering phenology could not. Inoue et al. (2014) reported that the threshold RGB-derived index values for detection of the timing of leaf flush and leaf fall could not be defined uniquely by analyzing phenological images taken with a fisheye lens. The problem resulted from the different conditions of target individuals; the center of the images captured the canopy surface of a tree, whereas the perimeter captured the side of the canopy. These results suggest that it may be necessary to install multiple digital cameras at a study site to capture enough usable images at different spatial scales. In addition, the problem resulted from a requirement to identify particular RGB-derived index values (i.e., thresholds) for determining phenological transitions. Curve fitting approaches that can detect the inflection point for RGB-derived indices during a phenological change may help to solve this problem (Ide and Oguma 2013; Henneken et al. 2014; Klosterman et al. 2014). To continuously observe detailed flowering, fruiting, leaf flush, leaf coloring, and leaf fall phenology, it will be necessary to improve phenological observations at the shoot scale, as has been done by Cyberforest (Saito et al. 2004), and comparative analyses of phenological images acquired at different spatial scales will be required.

To conserve biodiversity, the Japanese government developed and revised the national biodiversity strategy in 2012 (MEJ 2012). This strategy has actively encouraged learning by students through hands-on experience with environmental studies. Such learning is now included in the course of study developed by Japan’s Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (http://www.mext.go.jp). For instance, phenological observations of plants such as morning glory (Ipomoea spp.) are a valued part of science education at Japanese primary schools. To encourage learning through environmental studies, the online phenological data published on the Web site of Cyberforest may be helpful. Phenological observations by digital cameras are also helpful because they can replace or complement labor-intensive phenological observations using index trees conducted in university research forests and exhibition gardens (Fujimoto 2007; Sato 2014; the tree phenological observation network conducted by the Research Forests Council of Japanese universities, http://www.forest.kyushu-u.ac.jp/phenology/. Accessed 12 August 2015). Ide and Oguma (2013) demonstrated the usefulness of phenological observations by digital cameras in alpine ecosystems, where accessibility is difficult but remarkable environmental changes are occurring (Kudo 2014). These phenological observations by digital cameras may encourage students to pursue their interests through both university education and lifelong environmental learning. Strengthening cooperation with citizen scientists in a project such as the “Monitoring Sites 1000 Project,” conducted by the Ministry of the Environment’s Biodiversity Center of Japan (Kudo 2014; http://www.biodic.go.jp/moni1000/. Accessed 12 August 2015), may also develop environmental studies by encouraging activities related to phenological observation networks implemented using digital cameras.

Spectral radiometers

Spectral reflectance and vegetation indices measured by fixed-point spectral radiometers can detect the characteristics of plant phenology in secondary deciduous broad-leaved forest (Motohka et al. 2010; Nagai et al. 2010a), deciduous coniferous larch forest (Motohka et al. 2010), evergreen coniferous cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) forest (Nakaji et al. 2008) and Japanese cedar forest (Nagai et al. 2012), and grassland (Motohka et al. 2010). However, fewer ecosystems and study sites have been used for measurements with fixed-point spectral radiometers than for fixed-point digital cameras. Nasahara and Nagai (2015) used spectral radiometers to detect the mean tree phenology within 2 to 10 m of the device. To support ground truthing for satellite remote-sensing data is problematic because the footprint of the in situ spectral measurement is much smaller than that of the satellite data (typically ≥30 m and as great as 1000 m).

NDVI, EVI, and GRVI values in deciduous forests and grasslands increase rapidly during leaf flush and then become saturated before the vegetation achieves its maximum leaf area; they then decrease gradually during the leaf coloring and leaf fall periods (Nagai et al. 2010a; Motohka et al. 2010). Nagai et al. (2010a) examined the relationship between NDVI and EVI values observed by a spectral radiometer and the corresponding phenological images in a deciduous broad-leaved forest. NDVI values of 0.6 to 0.7 and EVI values of 0.4 to 0.5 potentially detected the onset of leaf flush, but neither index could detect the timing of leaf fall. This problem resulted from differences in the characteristics of the pattern and timing of leaf coloring and leaf fall among tree species (Nagai et al. 2014a). Nagai et al. (2014a) examined the relationship between seasonal variation of spectral reflectance and vegetation indices and spatial and temporal variations of leaf litter in a deciduous broad-leaved forest. GRVI, which observes only the seasonal color variation of the canopy surface, detected the timing of leaf fall more accurately than NDVI and EVI. Motohka et al. (2010) examined the relationship between seasonal variation of spectral reflectance and vegetation indices and daily phenological images in several deciduous forests and a grassland. The first date on which GRVI was greater than zero in the spring and the first date on which GRVI was less than zero in the autumn corresponded to the start and end of the growing season, respectively. This ground truthing information indicated a general ability to detect the start and end of the growing season in deciduous forests and a grassland by threshold-based analysis using GRVI (Motohka et al. 2010).

The seasonality of NDVI and EVI in evergreen coniferous forests was much smaller than that in deciduous forests (Nakaji et al. 2008; Nagai et al. 2012). In contrast, GRVI could detect the seasonal variation of leaf coloring at the canopy surface of a Japanese cedar forest in winter (winter reddening; Nagai et al. 2012). The seasonal variation of leaf color at the canopy surface in Japanese cedar forests was caused by changes in leaf pigments (Han et al. 2003). This seasonality correlated well with the seasonal variation in leaf photosynthetic capacity (Nagai et al. 2012). Detecting such changes is important because evergreen coniferous forests account for 30 % of Japan’s total forested area (Japan FAO Association 1997).

Many previous studies indicated that seasonal variation of satellite EVI values was correlated with that of GPP in various ecosystems (Rahman et al. 2005; Huete et al. 2006). These reports suggest that GPP could be directly evaluated by satellite EVI. To test this possibility, Nagai et al. (2010b) and Muraoka et al. (2013) examined the relationships between EVI values observed with a spectral radiometer and GPP obtained from CO2 flux tower measurements and between various vegetation indices (including EVI) observed with a spectral radiometer and photosynthetic capacity estimated by ecophysiological measurements and ecosystem modeling in the same deciduous broad-leaved forest. GPP increased exponentially with increasing EVI in spring; in contrast, GPP showed a linear decrease with decreasing EVI in autumn.

Previous studies used 8-, 10-, and 16-day composite satellite EVI data that comprised the best-quality data, with no effects of cloud contamination or atmospheric noise within these periods (Rahman et al. 2005; Huete et al. 2006). Estimated GPP values based on the composite satellite data were closer to the potential GPP values (i.e., the GPP under ideal conditions) observed under clear skies than to estimates of the actual GPP values under clear skies or rainy and cloudy conditions (Nagai et al. 2010b). During the leaf flush and leaf fall periods, high-quality Terra/MODIS NDVI data with no effects of cloud contamination or atmospheric noise were available in Japan for only 3 to 7 days per month (Nagai et al. 2011b). For this reason, GPP values estimated from satellite Japanese EVI data may overestimate the real values.

Phenological observations by satellite remote sensing

In this section, we will briefly summarize previous phenological research based on satellite remote sensing. Our previous research found fewer phenological studies in Japan than in North America, Europe, and mainland Asia (Nagai et al. 2015b). This may be because the 8-km spatial resolution of the Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies data (http://staff.glcf.umd.edu/sns/branch/htdocs.sns/data/gimms/. Accessed 12 August 2015) is too coarse to account for the heterogeneous Japanese plant phenology that results from the complex topography and vegetation cover. In contrast, the Terra and Aqua/MODIS GRVI, with 500-m spatial resolution, could detect the spatial variation in the timing of the start and end of the growing season along both vertical and horizontal gradients in Japan (Nagai et al. 2015b). Figure 3 shows the resulting spatial distribution of the timing of the start and end of the growing season in 2014.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Spatial distribution of a the start and b the end of the growing season (day of year) in 2014, detected by analyzing the daily Terra and Aqua MODIS GRVI observations with 500-m spatial resolution. White shows evergreen forests or points where we could not evaluate the timing of start or end of the growing season. For details of the method, see Nagai et al. (2015b)

To accurately evaluate the sensitivity of plant phenology to climate change, it is necessary to evaluate the year-to-year spatial variation of the timing of leaf flush and leaf fall over a wide area and a long time period. Although Nagai et al. (2015b) performed a decadal-scale analysis for Japan, they only showed the mean spatial and temporal timing of the start and end of the growing season during the study period for horizontal zones (2° latitude intervals) and vertical zones (200-m intervals). Previous research suggests that in a temperate climate, the sensitivity of plant phenology to climate change is clearer in southern parts of the region than in northern parts (Shen et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2015). In Japan, many river basins are divided by mountain ranges, creating small climatic zones close to each other but with different geographical characteristics. These divisions often occur at the boundaries between local authorities that are responsible for tracking phenological data. As a result, obtaining a detailed evaluation of the sensitivity of plant phenology to climate change would require the participation of Japan’s 47 prefectural and city governments.

Hadano et al. (2013) calibrated a phenological model for prediction of the timing of leaf flush by using both spatial variation of this timing detected from MODIS GRVI data with a 500-m spatial resolution and meteorological data at weather stations throughout Japan. They predicted the spatial and temporal variation of the timing of leaf flush under future climate change. Previous phenological models were based on in situ phenological datasets at multiple points (Xu and Chen 2013), and Hadano et al. (2013) suggested that it may be possible to accurately detect the sensitivity of plant phenology to climate change by integrating an analysis of satellite data with such a phenological model. In a temperate zone, the timing of flowering and leaf flush was estimated based on the number of chilling hours in winter and on the number of warming hours before bud burst in spring (Kim et al. 2012; Luedeling et al. 2013). Examining the relationship between the spatial variation of the timing of flowering and leaf flush predicted by phenological models and the timing of leaf flush detected by satellite observations may improve our understanding of the sensitivity of plant phenology to climate change at regional to continental scales.

Nagai et al. (2015a) examined the relationship between the spatial variation of Landsat-8 GRVI values with a 30-m spatial resolution and leaf coloring information published on Web sites on 1 day during the leaf coloring period in 2014. Ground truthing information for plant phenology obtained from weather stations, research forests, agricultural experiment stations, and phenological observation sites with digital cameras is not sufficient because of the scale mismatch between the satellite and in situ data. Further examination of the relationship between satellite-detected plant phenology and phenological information published on the Internet is required to account for the footprint of the satellite data.

Sekizawa et al. (2015) detected the evacuation-induced land cover changes following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster in 2011 by analyzing seasonal patterns of vegetation indices derived from MODIS data with a 250-m spatial resolution. Plant phenology may change significantly in response to changes in land cover or land use, ecological succession, and invasion by nonnative species. In Japan, progressive abandonment of cultivation and succession to bamboo forests has occurred in mid- to low-elevation mountains and suburban regions (MEJ 2012). Further studies will be required to accurately evaluate the relationship between the spatial and temporal variability of satellite-observed vegetation indices and those of vegetation cover at scales ranging from individual sites to whole landscapes.

Conclusions and future developments

In the many previous studies described in this review, phenological observations were obtained using index trees for a few tree species, near-surface remote-sensing observations for a few ecosystems or tree species, and satellite remote sensing at a regional scale. The differences in these approaches resulted from the different goals of the studies and differences in the available data. Suzuki (2015) noted that many previous studies of remote-sensing data were mainly from a technical perspective and that the ecological meaning of the signals was not sufficiently considered. In addition, many previous studies only used the limited datasets observed by scientists and other experts rather than the larger amount of data provided by citizen scientists. This may have prevented researchers from obtaining phenological data at a synoptic scale that covered multiple species over wide areas.

To solve these problems, researchers should attempt a multidisciplinary analysis that links index trees, near-surface remote sensing, satellite remote sensing, citizen science, and open-access information published on the Internet. Figure 4 illustrates the relationship between the amounts and spatial resolutions of the available phenological datasets. Japanese citizens are very interested in plant phenology, and their interest provides data at a small personal scale that can be linked with the abundant data at wider regional and national scales. Establishing this link will require the development of databases of phenological observations that will reveal ecosystem changes from the leaf scale to national scales (Muraoka and Koizumi 2009). Each source of data has advantages and problems (Table 3), but because these differ among the data sources, the advantages of one dataset may compensate for another dataset’s limitations.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Summary of the relationship between the amount and spatial resolution of the available datasets for phenological observations. Data obtained by citizen scientists tends to be openly published on the Internet

Table 3.

Summary of the advantages and limitations of different types of phenological observations

Method Observation period Observation points Spatial resolution Spatial representativeness of the data Labor Cost
Periodic visual inspection of index trees by experts 1953 to the presenta Multiple weather stations 1 to 100 cm Low High High personnel cost
Fixed-point observations by time-lapse digital photography 2003 to the presentb Multiple sites and different ecosystems 0.5 to 200 m Low Low High capital investment (e.g., tower, power supply)
Analysis of near-surface remotely sensed spectral reflectance and vegetation indices 2003 to the presentb Multiple sites and different ecosystems 10 m Low Low High observation instrument cost and capital investment (e.g., spectral radiometer, tower, power supply)
Analysis of satellite remotely sensed spectral reflectance and vegetation indices 2000 to the presentc Global scale 500 m High Low Free for end users
Phenological information published on the Internet Around 2010 to the present Multiple points 0.5 to 1000 m Low to high Low Free for end users

This table is a revised version of Table 1 in Nagai et al. (2015a)

aBy the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)

bBy the Phenological Eyes Network (Nasahara and Nagai 2015)

cBy the MODIS spectral radiometer sensor aboard the Terra satellite

Two studies from outside Japan provide examples of successful multidisciplinary studies that linked remote-sensing observations with index tree observations or citizen science. Delbart et al. (2015) examined the relationship between the start of the growing season in Canada, detected by SPOT/VEGETATION vegetation index data, and the timing of flowering and leaf flush reported by citizen scientists. The phenological information observed by the citizen scientists provided useful ground truthing for the satellite data. Kim et al. (2012) examined the relationships among the timing of cherry blooming at multiple locations in Korea, the start of the growing period detected from a MODIS vegetation index, and a model for prediction of the timing of leaf flush. Phenological information from index tree observations provided useful data for a multidisciplinary phenological study in both cases.

Phenological studies tend to be local because of the specific and diverse goals of the researchers. Unfortunately, this also means that there have been no direct comparisons between Japanese plant phenology and that in other countries. On the other hand, many Japanese studies were conducted both before and after World War II. However, those studies were published in Japanese. As a result, insufficient Japanese phenological information has been made available to the international research community (Ogawa-Onishi and Berry 2013). Recently, huge amounts of phenological information have become available on the Internet in Japanese, which means that it remains unavailable to researchers who cannot read Japanese. By way of example, Table 1 summarizes the first flowering date of cherry near 58 weather stations in Japan published by the Japan Meteorological Agency. To solve these issues, we propose the following challenging but important tasks: (1) We should conduct more multidisciplinary phenological studies in Japan through collaboration among researchers with different goals and between researchers and citizen scientists, with the aim of improving our understanding of phenology and permitting comparisons among observation networks. (2) We should evaluate both the unique characteristics of Japanese phenology and the characteristics shared with vegetation in other regions through international collaborations and through comparisons with results from foreign observation networks. (3) We should publicize Japanese language phenological data in the international research literature so that the data will be more accessible to the international research community. Of course, to accomplish this it will be necessary to obtain the necessary legal permissions to share this data, and it will also be necessary to find volunteers willing to translate the information into English and other languages. By implementing these recommendations, Japanese phenological studies will become increasingly powerful.

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their kind and constructive comments. This study was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-9) of the Ministry of the Environment of Japan.

References

  1. Akitsu T, Nasahara KN, Noda H, Motohka T, Murakami K, Tsuchida S, Nagai S. Long-term observation of seasonal and yearly variation of grassland by an automatic digital camera. Bulletin of the Terrestrial Environment Research Center, University of Tsukuba. 2011;12:5–12. [Google Scholar]
  2. Aono Y, Kazui K. Phenological data series of cherry tree flowering in Kyoto, Japan, and its application to reconstruction of springtime temperatures since the 9th century. Int J Climatol. 2008;28:905–914. doi: 10.1002/joc.1594. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aono Y, Tani A (2014) Autumn temperature deduced from historical records of autumn tints phenology of maple tree in Kyoto, Japan. Climate in Biosphere 14:18–28 (in Japanese with English abstract)
  4. Buitenwerf R, Rose L, Higgins S.I. (2015) Three decades of multi-dimensional change in global leaf phenology. Nature Climate Change 5:DOI: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2533
  5. Delbart N, Le Toan T, Kergoat L, Fedotova V. Remote sensing of spring phenology in boreal regions: a free of snow-effect method using NOAA–AVHRR and SPOT–VGT data (1982–2004) Remote Sens Environ. 2006;101:52–62. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.11.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Delbart N, Beaubien E, Kergoat L, Le Toan T. Comparing land surface phenology with leafing and flowering observations from the PlantWatch citizen network. Remote Sens Environ. 2015;160:273–280. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Doi H, Takahashi M. Latitudinal patterns in the phenological responses of leaf colouring and leaf fall to climate change in Japan. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2008;17(4):556–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2008.00398.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Doi H, Takahashi M, Katano I. Genetic diversity increases regional variation in phenological dates in response to climate change. Glob Chang Biol. 2010;16:373–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01993.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fujimoto S. Analysis of prediction methods for budburst days based on the phenological observation in 29 broad-leaved tree species for 10 years. J Jpn For Soc. 2007;89:253–261. doi: 10.4005/jjfs.89.253. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fujisawa M, Kobayashi K. Apple (Malus pumila var. domestica) phenology is advancing due to rising air temperature in northern Japan. Glob Chang Biol. 2010;16:2651–2660. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02126.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hadano M, Nasahara KN, Motohka T, Noda HM, Murakami K, Hosaka M. High-resolution prediction of leaf onset date in Japan in the 21st century under the IPCC A1B scenario. Ecol Evol. 2013;3:1798–1807. doi: 10.1002/ece3.575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Han Q, Shinohara K, Kakubari Y, Mukai Y. Photoprotective role of rhodoxanthin during cold acclimation in Cryptomeria japonica. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26:715–723. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01008.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henneken R, Dose V, Schleip C, Menzel A. Detecting plant seasonality from webcams using Bayesian multiple change point analysis. Agric For Meteorol. 2014;168:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Huete AR, Didan K, Shimabukuro YE, Ratana P, Saleska SR, Hutyra LR, Yang W, Nemani RR, Myneni R. Amazon rainforests green-up with sunlight in dry season. Geophys Res Lett. 2006;33:L06405. doi: 10.1029/2005GL025583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ibáñez I, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ, Ellwood E, Higuchi H, Lee SD, Kobori H, Silander JA. Forecasting phenology under global warming. Phil Trans Royal Soc B. 2010;365:3247–3260. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ide R, Oguma H. Use of digital cameras for phenological observations. Ecol Informat. 2010;5:339–347. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2010.07.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ide R, Oguma H. A cost-effective monitoring method using digital time-lapse cameras for detecting temporal and spatial variations of snowmelt and vegetation phenology in alpine ecosystems. Ecol Informat. 2013;16:25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ide R, Nakaji T, Motohka T, Oguma H. Advantages of visible-band spectral remote sensing at both satellite and near-surface scales for monitoring the seasonal dynamics of GPP in a Japanese larch forest. J Agric Meteorol. 2011;67:75–84. doi: 10.2480/agrmet.67.2.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Inoue T, Nagai S, Saitoh TM, Muraoka H, Nasahara KN, Koizumi H. Detection of the different characteristics of year-to-year variation in foliage phenology among deciduous broad-leaved tree species by using daily continuous canopy surface images. Ecol Inform. 2014;22:58–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Japan FAO Association . Forests and forestry in Japan, 2nd ed. Tokyo: Japan FAO Association; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  21. JMA . Guidelines for the observation of phenology. 3rd. Tokyo: Japan Meteorological Agency; 1985. [Google Scholar]
  22. JMA (2014) Report on recent climatic change: Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo:253 pp(in Japanese)
  23. Keenan TF, Gray J, Friedl MA, Toomey M, Bohrer G, Hollinger DY, Munger JW, O’Keefe J, Schmid HP, Wing IS, Yang B, Richardson AD. Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology. Nat Clim Chang. 2014;4:598–604. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2253. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim S, Kang S, Lim J-H, Chun J-H, Sung J-H. Regional parameterization of canopy onset models using MODIS and flowering onset data. Ecol Model. 2012;247:190–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.08.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Klosterman ST, Hufkens K, Gray JM, Melaas E, Sonnentag O, Lavine I, Mitchell L, Norman R, Friedl MA, Richardson AD. Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery. Biogeosciences. 2014;11:4305–4320. doi: 10.5194/bg-11-4305-2014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kudo G. Vulnerability of phenological synchrony between plants and pollinators in an alpine ecosystem. Ecol Res. 2014;29:571–581. doi: 10.1007/s11284-013-1108-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Linderholm HW. Growing season changes in the last century. Agric For Meteorol. 2006;137:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luedeling E, Guo L, Dai J, Leslie C, Blanke MM. Differential responses of trees to temperature variation during the chilling and forcing phases. Agric For Meteorol. 2013;181:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.06.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Matsumoto K. Causal factors for spatial variation in long-term phenological trends in Ginkgo biloba L. in Japan. Int J Climatol. 2010;30(9):1280–1288. [Google Scholar]
  30. Matsumoto K, Ohta T, Irasawa M, Nakamura T. Climate change and extension of the Ginkgo biloba L. growing season in Japan. Glob Chang Biol. 2003;9:1634–1642. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00688.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. MEJ . National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan 2012–2020. Tokyo: Ministry of the Environment of Japan; 2012. p. 252 pp. [Google Scholar]
  32. Miller-Rushing AJ, Katsuki T, Primack RB, Ishii Y, Lee SD, Higuchi H. Impact of global warming on a group of related species and their hybrids: cherry tree (Rosaceae) flowering at Mt. Takao, Japan. American J Botany. 2007;94:1470–1478. doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.9.1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mizunuma T, Koyanagi T, Mencuccini M, Nasahara KN, Wingate L, Grace J. The comparison of several colour indices for the photographic recording of canopy phenology of Fagus crenata Blume in eastern Japan. Plant Ecol Divers. 2011;4:67–77. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2011.563759. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Morisette JT, Richardson AD, Knapp AK, Fisher JI, Graham EA, Abatzoglou J, Wilson BE, Breshears DD, Henebry GM, Hanes JM, et al. Tracking the rhythm of the seasons in the face of global change: phenological research in the 21st century. Frontiers Ecol Environ. 2009;7:253–260. doi: 10.1890/070217. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Motohka T, Nasahara KN, Oguma H, Tsuchida S. Applicability of green–red vegetation index for remote sensing of vegetation phenology. Remote Sens. 2010;2:2369–2387. doi: 10.3390/rs2102369. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Muraoka H, Koizumi H. “Satellite Ecology” for linking ecology, remote sensing and micrometeorology from plot to regional scales for ecosystem structure and function study. J Plant Res. 2009;122:3–20. doi: 10.1007/s10265-008-0188-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Muraoka H, Noda HM, Nagai S, Motohka T, Saitoh TM, Nasahara KN, Saigusa N. Spectral vegetation indices as the indicator of canopy photosynthetic productivity in a deciduous broadleaf forest. J Plant Ecol. 2013;6:393–407. doi: 10.1093/jpe/rts037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Nagai S, Inoue T, Ohtsuka T, Kobayashi H, Kurumado K, Muraoka H, Nasahara KN. Relationship between spatio-temporal characteristics of leaf-fall phenology and seasonal variations in near surface- and satellite-observed vegetation indices in a cool-temperate deciduous broad-leaved forest in Japan. Int J Remote Sens. 2014;35:3520–3536. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2014.907937. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nagai S, Inoue T, Suzuki R. Leaf-coloring information published on web sites and its utility in the ground-truthing of satellite remote-sensing data for mapping autumn leaf phenology. Jpn J Biometeorol. 2015;52(2):119–129. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nagai S, Maeda T, Muraoka H, Suzuki R, Nasahara KN. Using digital camera images to detect canopy condition of deciduous broad-leaved trees. Plant Ecol Divers. 2011;4:78–88. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2011.579188. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nagai S, Nakai T, Saitoh TM, Busey RC, Kobayashi H, Suzuki R, Muraoka H, Kim Y. Seasonal changes in camera-based indices from an open canopy black spruce forest in Alaska, and comparison with indices from a closed canopy evergreen coniferous forest in Japan. Polar Sci. 2013;7:125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.polar.2012.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nagai S, Nasahara KN, Muraoka H, Akiyama T, Tsuchida S. Field experiments to test the use of the normalized difference vegetation index for phenology detection. Agric For Meteorol. 2010;150:152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nagai S, Saigusa N, Muraoka H, Nasahara KN. What makes the satellite-based EVI–GPP relationship unclear in a deciduous broad-leaved forest? Ecol Res. 2010;25:359–365. doi: 10.1007/s11284-009-0663-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Nagai S, Saitoh TM, Kobayashi H, Ishihara M, Motohka T, Suzuki R, Nasahara KN, Muraoka H. In situ examination for the relationship between various vegetation indices and tree phenology in an evergreen coniferous forest, Japan. Int J Remote Sens. 2012;33:6202–6214. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2012.682660. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Nagai S, Saitoh TM, Nasahara KN, Suzuki R. Spatio-temporal distribution of the timing of start and end of growing season along vertical and horizontal gradients in Japan. Int J Biometeorol. 2015;59:47–54. doi: 10.1007/s00484-014-0822-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Nagai S, Saitoh TM, Noh NJ, Yoon TK, Kobayashi H, Suzuki R, Nasahara KN, Son Y, Muraoka H. Utility of information in photographs taken upwards from the floor of closed-canopy deciduous broadleaved and closed-canopy evergreen coniferous forests for continuous observation of canopy phenology. Ecol Inform. 2013;18:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.05.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Nagai S, Saitoh TM, Suzuki R, Nasahara KN, Lee W-K, Son Y, Muraoka H. The necessity and availability of noise-free daily satellite-observed NDVI during rapid phenological changes in terrestrial ecosystems in East Asia. For Sci Tech. 2011;7:174–183. [Google Scholar]
  48. Nagai S, Yoshitake S, Inoue T, Suzuki R, Muraoka H, Nasahara KN, Saitoh TM. Year-to-year blooming phenology observation using time-lapse digital camera images. J Agric Meteorol. 2014;70(3):163–170. doi: 10.2480/agrmet.D-13-00021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nakaji T, Ide R, Takagi K, Kosugi Y, Ohkubo S, Nasahara KN, Saigusa N, Oguma H. Utility of spectral vegetation indices for estimation of light conversion efficiency in coniferous forests in Japan. Agric For Meteorol. 2008;148:776–787. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.11.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nakaji T, Oguma H, Hiura T. Ground-based monitoring of the leaf phenology of deciduous broad-leaved trees using high resolution NDVI camera images. J Agric Meteorol. 2011;67(2):65–74. doi: 10.2480/agrmet.67.2.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nasahara KN, Nagai S. Review: development of an in-situ observation network for terrestrial ecological remote sensing—the Phenological Eyes Network (PEN) Ecol Res. 2015;30(2):211–223. doi: 10.1007/s11284-014-1239-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Natural Environmental Information GIS (1999) National surveys on the natural environment (5th survey on vegetation). Biodiversity Center of Japan (http://www.biodic.go.jp/index_e.html)
  53. Noda HM, Motohka T, Murakami K, Muraoka H, Nasahara KN. Reflectance and transmittance spectra of leaves and shoots of 22 vascular plant species and reflectance spectra of trunks and branches of 12 tree species in Japan. Ecol Res doi: 2015 [Google Scholar]
  54. Noda HM, Muraoka H, Nasahara KN, Saigusa N, Murayama S, Koizumi H. Phenology of leaf morphological, photosynthetic, and nitrogen use characteristics of canopy trees in a cool-temperate deciduous broadleaf forest at Takayama, central Japan. Ecol Res. 2015;30:247–266. doi: 10.1007/s11284-014-1222-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ogawa-Onishi Y, Berry PM. Ecological impacts of climate change in Japan: the importance of integrating local and international publications. Biol Conserv. 2013;157:361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ohashi Y, Kawakami H, Shigeta Y, Ikeda H, Yamamoto N. The phenology of cherry blossom (Prunus yedoensis “Somei-yoshino”) and the geographic features contributing to its flowering. Int J Biometeorol. 2012;56:903–914. doi: 10.1007/s00484-011-0496-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Peñuelas J, Rutishauser T, Filella I. Phenology feedbacks on climate change. Science. 2009;324:887–888. doi: 10.1126/science.1173004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Polgar CA, Primack RB. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytol. 2011;191:926–941. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03803.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rahman AF, Sims DA, Cordova VD, El-Masri BZ (2005) Potential of MODIS EVI and surface temperature for directly estimating per-pixel ecosystem C fluxes. Geophys Res Lett 32:L19404. doi:10.1029/2005GL024127
  60. Richardson AD, Jenkins JP, Braswell BH, Hollinger DY, Ollinger SV, Smith M-L. Use of digital webcam images to track spring green-up in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Oecologia. 2007;152:323–334. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0657-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Richardson AD, Keenan TF, Migliavacca M, Ryu Y, Sonnentag O, Toomey M. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric For Meteorol. 2013;169:156–173. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Saito K, Fujiwara A, Ishii H, Shimura S, Yano A, Kumagai Y. A production of multimedia contents derived from forest environment monitoring video data. Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2004;68(5):923–926. doi: 10.5632/jila.68.923. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Saitoh TM, Nagai S, Saigusa N, Kobayashi H, Suzuki R, Nasahara KN, Muraoka H. Assessing the use of camera-based indices for characterizing canopy phenology in relation to gross primary production in a deciduous broad-leaved and an evergreen coniferous forest in Japan. Ecol Inform. 2012;11:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2012.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sato M. Long-term variations of budding and flowering in trees of the botanical garden of University of Tsukuba, Japan. Tsukuba J Agric Forestry. 2014;2:41–55. [Google Scholar]
  65. SCBD (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity Montreal, 94 pp
  66. Schwartz MD, Hanes JM, Liang L. Comparing carbon flux and high-resolution spring phenological measurements in a northern mixed forest. Agric For Meteorol. 2013;169:136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sekizawa R, Ichii K, Kondo M (2015) Satellite-based detection of evacuation-induced land cover changes following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Remote Sens Lett. doi:10.1080/2150704X.2015.1076207
  68. Shen M, Tang Y, Chen J, Yang X, Wang C, Cui X, Yang Y, Han L, Li L, Du J, Zhang G, Cong N. Earlier-season vegetation has greater temperature sensitivity of spring phenology in northern hemisphere. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Sims DA, Gamon JA. Relationship between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sens Environ. 2002;81:337–354. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00010-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Sonnentag O, Hufkens K, Teshera-Sterne C, Young AM, Friedl M, Braswell BH, Milliman T, O'Keefe J, Richardson AD. Digital repeat photography for phenological research in forest ecosystems. Agric For Meteorol. 2012;152:159–177. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sparks TH. Local-scale adaptation to climate change: the village flower festival. Clim Res. 2014;60:87–89. doi: 10.3354/cr01228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Suzuki H. The classification of Japanese climates. Geogra Rev Jpn. 1962;35(5):205–211. doi: 10.4157/grj.35.205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Suzuki R (2015) Assessment of terrestrial ecosystem function and service by remote sensing. Jpn J Ecol 65(2):125–134 (in Japanese with English abstract)
  74. Ueta M, Kurosawa R, Saito K. The data set of song frequency of forest bird. Bird Res. 2012;8:R1–R4. [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang H, Ge Q, Rutishauser T, Dai Y, Dai J. Parameterization of temperature sensitivity of spring phenology and its application in explaining diverse phenological responses to temperature change. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:8833. doi: 10.1038/srep08833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Xu L, Chen X. Regional unified model-based leaf unfolding prediction from 1960 to 2009 across northern China. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19:1275–1284. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Biometeorology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES