Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nutr Cancer. 2015 Nov 23;68(1):1–17. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2016.1105267

Table 1.

Cancer Intervention Outcomes of Published Clinical Trials with SeMet/Se-yeast in North America

Trial Se form & Dose
µg Se/day
Baseline Se
ng/ml
Post-Rx Se*
ng/ml (max)
Outcome**
parameter
RR***
Rx/Placebo
1o Ref
Clark NPCT Se-yeast, 200 113 (median) 190 PCa (2nd) 0.37 (p=0.002) (3)
Clark NPCT
(follow-up)
1 tertile, <106 PCa (2nd) 0.14 (5)
2 tertile, 107–123 PCa (2nd) 0.33
3 tertile, >123 PCa (2nd) 1.14
SELECT SeMet, 200 136 (median) 251(max283) PCa (1o) 1.04 (p>0.15) (8)
SWOG9917 SeMet, 200 137 (median) 261 (max305) PCa (1o) 0.97 (p=0.73) (9)
ECOG NBT Se-Yeast, 200 126 (median) Not available PCa (1o) 0.94 (p=0.18) (10)
Se-Yeast, 400 Not available “ “ 0.90 (p=0.17)
ECOG5597 Se-Yeast, 200 Not available Lung Ca (1o) 1.25 (p=0.294) (11)
Lung Ca
*

Highest median/mean reported for that study

**

Outcome parameter: planned primary endpoint (1o) vs. added secondary endpoint (2nd) of the respective trial.

The Negative Biopsy Trial (NBT)-US, New Zealand

***

95% Confidence intervals were not presented in most of these studies.