Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 2;4(1):e18–e27. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2015.12.006

Table 3.

“At Least Slightly Better” and “At Least Better Response” Status in Clinical Global Impression of Change in Premature Ejaculation by Study Visit (Subgroups by Dosage)

Dosage 1 = 30 mg (n = 141) Dosage 2 = 30 → 60 mg (n = 124) Dosage 3 = 30 → 60 → 30 mg (n = 13) Total (n = 281) P value
Visit 3 (week 4)
 At least “slightly better,” n (%) 97 (87.39) 80 (65.04) 11 (84.62) 188 (76.11) .0003
 95% CI 79.74–92.93 55.92–73.42 54.55–98.08 70.30–81.29
 At least “better,” n (%) 51 (45.95) 24 (19.51) 4 (30.77) 79 (31.98) <.0001
 95% CI 36.45–55.67 12.92–27.63 9.09–61.43 26.21–38.19
 No change or worse, n (%) 14 (12.61) 43 (34.96) 2 (15.38) 59 (23.89)
Visit 4 (week 8)
 At least slightly “better,” n (%) 102 (91.89) 111 (89.52) 12 (92.31) 225 (90.73) .8058
 95% CI 85.17–96.23 82.74–94.30 63.97–99.81 86.41–94.03
 At least “better,” n (%) 56 (50.45) 43 (34.68) 5 (38.46) 104 (41.94) .0491
 95% CI 40.80–60.08 26.36–43.75 13.86–68.42 35.72–48.34
 No change or worse, n (%) 9 (8.11) 13 (10.48) 1 (7.69) 23 (9.27)
Visit 5 (week 12)
 At least “slightly better,” n (%) 109 (90.83) 107 (86.29) 12 (92.31) 228 (88.72) .4896
 95% CI 84.19,95.33 78.96–91.81 63.97–99.81 84.20–92.31
 At least “better,” n (%) 68 (56.67) 62 (50.00) 4 (30.77) 134 (52.14) .1671
 95% CI 47.31–65.68 40.89–59.11 9.09–61.43 45.84–58.39
 No change or worse, n (%) 11 (9.17) 17 (13.71) 1 (7.69) 29 (11.28)