Table 4.
Comparisons with the related works
| Methods | RT | No. of TP | No. of FP | No. of FN | P(%) | R(%) | F(%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract level | – | 815 | 4145 | 251 | 16.4 | 76.5 | 27.1 |
| Sentence level | – | 570 | 1672 | 496 | 25.4 | 53.5 | 34.5 |
| Xu et al. (27) | 8 | 623 | 496 | 443 | 55.7 | 58.4 | 57.0 |
| Pons et al. (28) | 16 | 574 | 544 | 492 | 51.3 | 53.8 | 52.6 |
| Our online results | 5 | 358 | 346 | 708 | 50.9 | 33.6 | 40.5 |
| Approach in this article | 13 | 439 | 355 | 627 | 55.3 | 41.2 | 47.2 |
In the table, RT stands for the response time of different systems, TP stands for the true-positive relations, FP stands for the false-positive relations and FN stands for the false-negative relations.