Table 2. Taxonomic analysis of relative family abundance.

Family level relative abundance [%] differences in Rag2^-/- vs. DKO treated with PBS (+PBS) or after adoptive T cell transfer (+AT). Fecal sample collected and pooled from these groups were used in the FMT experiment. Asterisks indicate significant differences in Dunn’s test between respective experimental groups; * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001 (ns–no significant difference).

Family	Rag+PBS [%]	Rag+AT [%]	DKO+PBS [%]	DKO+AT [%]	Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test
					Rag+PBS vs DKO+PBS	Rag+PBS vs Rag+AT	DKO+PBS vs DKO+AT	Rag+ AT vs DKO+AT	Anova P value
Lactobacillaceae	33.46	35.71	13.21	16.18	****	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Bacteroidales (S24-7)	29.63	28.33	32.36	24.49	ns	ns	ns	ns	0.0864
Clostridiales other	8.59	11.05	1.05	1.02	****	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Bifidobacteriaceae	5.97	2.95	3.40	2.54	ns	**	ns	ns	0.0023
Lachnospiraceae	5.48	6.20	2.44	2.79	***	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Erysipelotrichaceae	5.29	1.67	30.06	30.62	****	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Ruminococcaceae	4.60	4.74	2.04	1.70	****	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Bacteroidaceae	2.10	3.98	5.05	11.91	**	**	ns	ns	<0.0001
Turicibacteraceae	2.03	1.67	6.17	4.44	****	ns	ns	***	<0.0001
Anaeroplasmataceae	1.46	2.15	0.29	0.66	****	ns	ns	**	<0.0001
Enterococcaceae	0.35	0.43	2.54	2.48	****	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Coriobacteriaceae	0.35	0.30	0.14	0.16	***	ns	ns	**	<0.0001
[Mogibacteriaceae]	0.08	0.09	0.00	0.00	****	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Dehalobacteriaceae	0.04	0.05	0.00	0.01	****	ns	ns	****	<0.0001
Christensenellaceae	0.03	0.02	0.04	0.02	ns	ns	ns	ns	0.0294
Streptococcaceae	0.02	0.02	0.03	0.03	ns	ns	ns	ns	0.9306
Bacillales other	0.02	0.02	0.07	0.04	****	ns	ns	**	<0.0001
Lactobacillales other	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	ns	ns	ns	ns	0.0054
Bacillaceae	0.01	0.01	0.07	0.06	****	ns	ns	***	<0.0001
Corynebacteriaceae	0.01	0.01	0.01	0.01	ns	ns	ns	ns	0.4094
Clostridiaceae	0.00	0.11	0.00	0.05	ns	ns	*	ns	0.0141