Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 2;7(3):3255–3266. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6487

Table 4. Cox proportional hazards regression model analysis of recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival in NMIBC patients.

Parameters Categories Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
RFS
 Age <67 VS <67 1.058(0.689∼1.624) 0.797 NA
 Gender Male VS Female 1.465(0.906∼2.368) 0.119 NA
 Tumor size <3cm VS <3cm 1.280(0.834∼1.965) 0.259 NA
 Multifocality Focal VS Multifocal 0.665(0.421∼1.052) 0.081 NA
 Concomitant CIS Yes VS No 5.247(3.321∼8.289) <0.001 8.445(4.873∼14.636) <0.001
 Stage Ta VS T1 1.937(1.261∼2.977) 0.003 0.861(0.519∼1.428) 0.562
 Grade Low VS High 2.892(1.776∼4.712) <0.001 2.256(1.268∼4.013) 0.006
 miR-155 Negative VS Positive 2.043(1.083∼3.854) 0.027 3.497(1.722∼7.099) 0.001
PFS
 Age <67 VS <67 1.473(0.754∼2.880) 0.257 NA
 Gender Male VS Female 1.462(0.705∼3.034) 0.307 NA
 Tumor size <3cm VS <3cm 1.342(0.698∼2.580) 0.379 NA
 Multifocality Focal VS Multifocal 0.634(0.312∼1.290) 0.209 NA
 Concomitant CIS Yes VS No 4.800(2.423∼9.508) <0.001 5.420(2.535∼11.586) <0.001
 Stage Ta VS T1 9.927(3.856∼25.554) <0.001 3.368(1.153∼9.840) 0.026
 Grade Low VS High 16.231(3.894∼67.647) <0.001 4.361(0.858∼22.177) 0.076
 miR-155 Negative VS Positive 10.146(1.389∼74.091) 0.022 9.466(1.210∼74.066) 0.032

Abbreviations: RFS, Recurrence-free survival; PFS, Progression-free survival; VS, versus; HR, Hazard ratio; CI, Confidence interval; CIS, Carcinoma in situ; NA, not considered in the multivariable model.