Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Audiol. 2016 Feb 15;55(5):285–294. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1120892

Table 1.

Summary of seven studies evaluating ANL and real-world hearing aid outcomes. The first four studies found significant associations between ANL and outcomes, while this association was less clear in the last three studies. The percentage shown in parentheses in the last column represents the percentage of observed successful users defined by a given outcome measure. Nabelek et al (2006) and Freyaldenhoven et al (2008a) used the same group of subjects.

Subject number Hearing aid experience ANL delivery Design Outcome measure
Nabelek et al (2006)/Freyaldenhoven et al (2008a) 191 First-time users:16.2%; Experienced users: 3 months to 3 years experience Sound field Cross-sectional HA-Use (36.1%)
Freyaldenhoven et al (2008b) 69 Information unavailable Sound field Cross-sectional HA-Use (36.2%)
Taylor (2008) 27 All first-time users Binaural earphones Prospective (1-month outcome) IOI-HA
Ho et al (2013b) 80 First-time users: 77.5% Sound field Prospective (3-month outcome) IOI-HA (53.8%)
HA-Use (73.8%)

Schwartz and Cox (2012) 50 All experienced users; at least 6 months experience Sound field Cross-sectional Various measures (70% to 88%)
Olsen et al (2012) 63 All experienced users; mean experience = 11 years Monaural earphone Cross-sectional IOI-HA
HA-Use (91%)
Walravens et al (2014) 96 All hearing aid owners; < 1 year: 9.4%, 1 to 5 years: 47.9%, > 5 years: 41.7% Binaural earphones Cross-sectional HA-Use (50.9%)
Hearing aid daily use