Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 6;19(8):1405–1416. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015002888

Table 3.

Patterns of food source destinations most often used for household food acquisition among low-income African-American families (n 298) in Baltimore City, MD, USA, June 2013–June 2014

Food source destinations
Factor 1* Factor 2* Factor 3* Factor 4* Factor 5* Factor 6* Factor 7*
Local carry-out (0·85) Supermarket or grocery store (0·77) Street food vendor (0·80) Sit-down restaurant, bar or pubs (0·64) Public market (0·75) Local or urban farm stand (−0·74) Arabber or mobile produce cart (0·63)
Chain fast-food restaurant (0·74) Wholesale food store (0·62) Family and friends (0·70) Virtual Supermarket program (0·63) Specialty store (0·74) Food pantry (−0·66)
Local corner store (0·69)
Variance (%) 11·06 9·43 9·06 8·06 7·88 6·63 6·50
Households Mean (sd),§
Food secure (n 174) −0·01 1·04 0·03 1·03 0·04 1·20 0·03 1·00 −0·01 1·10 0·04 0·79 −0·09 0·94
Food insecure without hunger (n 87) −0·00 0·99 −0·11 0·88 −0·03 0·63 −0·19 0·80 0·03 0·90 −0·10 1·39 0·07 0·69
Food insecure with hunger (n 37) 0·05 0·87 0·01 0·90 −0·13 0·64 0·67 1·31 −0·03 0·73 0·03 0·85 0·29 1·64
*

Factors were extracted by principal component analysis adopting the eigenvalues >1·0 criterion. Patterns extracted were subjected to Varimax rotation with Kaiser normalization. Food sources with absolute factor loadings >0·6 (given in parentheses) were maintained in the pattern.

Percentage of total variance explained by each factor retained. Cumulative explained variance of the seven obtained factors: 58·61 %.

No significant differences were found between groups (P<0·05).

§

One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test to compare the groups.