Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 30;24:1155–1164. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3833-z

Table 4.

Outcomes

Study Groupa Return to sports AOFAS Satisfactionb Redislocation
Adachi et al. [2] A 83 % Pre m = 76, post m = 93 N = 0
Cho et al. [5] A 100 %, mean 3.0 months Pre m = 60, post m = 93 E = 4, G = 10, p = 2 N = 1
Cho et al. [5] B 100 %, mean 3.1 months Pre m = 59, post m = 91 E = 3, G = 9, p = 1 N = 0
Hui et al. [10] A 86 N = 0
Karlsson et al. [12] B 100 %, mean 4.5 months N = 0
Kollias et al. [13] B 91 %, mean 9.1 month Pre m 53, post m 96 N = 0
Maffulli et al. [18] A Pre m = 5, post m = 95 E = 12, G = 2 N = 0
Ogawa et al. [25] B Post m = 87 N = 0
Porter et al. [27] B 100 %, mean 3.0 months N = 0
Raikin et al. [29] B Pre m = 61, post m = 93 E = 9, G = 4, F = 1 N = 1
Saxena et al. [33] B 100 %, mean 3.2 months Pre m = 58, post m = 97 N = 1
Tomihara et al. [39] A 80 %, mean 2.9 month Pre m = 78, post m = 93 N = 0
Tomihara et al. [39] C 54.40 %, mean 3.9 months Pre m = 77, post m = 89 N = 2
Walther et al. [41] B 100 % Pre m = 69, post m = 95 N = 0
Wang et al. [42] D 100 %, mean 2.8 months Pre m = 73, post m = 100 E = 17 N = 0
Zhenbo et al. [43] C 88 %, mean 4.4 months Pre m = 56, post m = 88 E = 12, G = 11, F = 3 N = 0

a Group A SPR repair, Group B groove deepening and SPR repair, Group C bony procedure, Group D rerouting procedure

b E excellent, G good, F fair, P poor