Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 31;6(3):e009509. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009509

Table 2.

Estimates of the pooled mean difference and 95% LoA between the temporal artery thermometer and reference standard. Random-effects meta-analysis*

Pooled mean difference, °C
(95% limits of agreement)
Number of comparisons
Overall −0.19 (−1.16 to 0.77) 43
Subgroup analysis
Reference standards†
 Rectal −0.19 (−1.21 to 0.81) 23
 Oesophagus −0.03 (−0.43 to 0.36) 2
 Bladder −0.17 (−1.30 to 0.95) 8
 Nasopharynx 0.09 (−0.73 to 0.91) 3
 Pulmonary artery −0.40 (−1.30 to 0.51) 6
Patient factors
 Children −0.20 (−1.17 to 0.76) 26
 Adults −0.17 (−1.14 to 0.79) 17
Febrile status
 Febrile −0.31 (−1.22 to 0.59) 9
 Afebrile 0.07 (−0.72 to 0.86) 12
 Mixed −0.28 (−1.37 to 0.79) 22
Thermometer factors‡
 TAT-5000 −0.10 (−1.09 to 0.89) 22
 Other −0.27 (−1.23 to 0.67) 20

*Random-effects pooled estimates are calculated according to Williamson et al.9

†One study used the brain.

‡Thermometer type was unclear in one study.

LoA, limits of agreement; TAT, temporal artery thermometers.