Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 10;8(7):330–337. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i7.330

Table 3.

Factors associated with sufficient safety margin after endoscopic submucosal dissection (Univariate)

Safety margin1 mm Safety margin > 1 mm P value
n = 63 n = 352
Age, yr (mean ± SD) 65.9 ± 11.1 63.9 ± 9.5 0.14
Male/female 38/25 253/99 0.12
Tumor margin, n (%) 0.52
Well-defined 53 (84.1) 284 (80.7)
Ill-defined 10 (15.9) 68 (19.3)
Tumor size, n (%) 0.55
≤ 20 mm 21 (33.3) 95 (27.0)
21-30 mm 12 (19.0) 65 (18.5)
31-40 mm 14 (22.2) 108 (30.7)
> 40 mm 16 (25.4) 84 (23.9)
Tumor location, n (%) < 0.0001
Upper 7 (11.1) 8 (2.3)
Mid 31 (49.2) 98 (27.8)
Lower 25 (39.7) 246 (69.9)
Histology, n (%) 0.85
Well differentiated 32 (50.8) 163 (46.3)
Moderate differentiated 24 (38.1) 156 (44.3)
Poorly differentiated 3 (4.8) 27 (7.7)
Signet ring cell 4 (6.3) 6 (1.7)
Procedure time, min (mean ± SD) 58.9 ± 43.8 48.5 ± 35.4 0.04