Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 10;8(7):338–343. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i7.338

Table 4.

Placement and outcome comparisons between self-expanding esophageal metal stents and self-expanding esophageal plastic stents

SEMS (n = 30) SEPS (n = 13) P value
Initial placement procedure time (min, mean ± SD) 33.17 ± 16.88 35.85 ± 27.39 0.696
Dilation required prior to stent placement 0 23% 0.023
Complications, n (%) 7 (23%) 3 (23%) 1
Time to first complication (n) < 30 d: 6 < 30 d: 2 1
> 30 d: 1 > 30 d: 1
In-hospital mortality (%) 7% 8% 1
Re-intervention required (%) 20% 23% 1
30 d survival after procedure (%) 95% 80% 0.251
Length of stay (d, mean ± SD) 11.47 ± 12.78 12.15 ± 16.21 0.883

SEMS: Self-expanding esophageal metal stents; SEPS: Self-expanding esophageal plastic stents.