Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;142(5):498–545. doi: 10.1037/bul0000037
Study name Age when effect size was coded family-risk (control) Sample size Group 1 (Group 2) Construct (outcome test) Effect size (d) Prevalence of dyslexia (in family-risk sample/in control sample without family risk) Recruitment of relatives with dyslexia Socioeconomic status
Note. BAS = British Ability Scales; Bayley MDI = Bayley Mental Developmental Index; BNT = Boston Naming Test; BPVS = British Picture Vocabulary Scale; CELF = Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals; CN Rep = Children’s Test of Nonword Repetition; Comp = comprehension; DAS = Differential Ability Scales; CPM = Colored Progressive Matrices; DEAP = Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology; GORT = Gray Oral Reading Tests; K-BIT = Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test; m-ABC = Movement Assessment Battery for Children; M CDI = MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories; NARA = Neale Analysis of Reading Ability; NEPSY = Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment; PA = phonological awareness; PCC = percentage consonants correct; Phon Aw = phonological awareness; Phon memory = phonological memory; PPVT = Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test; RAN = rapid naming; SON-R = Snijders-Oomen nonverbal intelligence tests; vSTM = verbal short-term memory; WAIS = Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; WPPSI = Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence; WISC = Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children; WJ = Woodcock Johnson; WOLD = Wechsler Objective Language Dimensions; WORD = Wechsler Objective Reading Dimensions; Word ID = word identification; WRMT = Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests; YARC = York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension.
Blomert & Willems, 2010 Kgarten 53 (47) Dyslexia versus controls: 44%/.09% Parental questionnaire, sibling with a diagnosis of dyslexia
Articulatory accuracy (pronounce a word correctly after parts have been deleted) .09
IQ (general intelligence test not specified) Verbal short term memory (word span)
Receptive vocabulary (test not specified) .19
Letter knowledge (correctly name or sound out visual presented letters) .18
Phon Aw (blend phonemes or phoneme strings) .37
.11
.10
Boets, De Smedt, et al., 2010 (1) Dyslexia versus controls: Maternal and paternal education are measured
5.33 (5.33) 16 (26) IQ (Raven) −.32
Phon Aw (composite PA) −1.37
Phon memory (CN Rep) −1.23
RAN (colors and objects) −.80
vSTM (digit span) −.40
1st grade Vocabulary knowledge (WISC vocabulary) −.49
Nonword reading (nonword reading fluency) −1.56
Paternal education .31
Maternal education .00
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: 44% Maternal and paternal education are measured
5.33 (5.33) 20 (26) IQ (Raven) −.32
Phon Aw (composite PA) −.52
Phon memory (CN Rep) −.65
RAN (colors and objects) −.32
vSTM (digit span) .25
1st grade Vocabulary knowledge (WISC vocabulary) −.40
Nonword reading (nonword reading fluency) −.27
Paternal education −.28
Maternal education .00
Boets, Vandermosten, et al., 2011 (1) 5:6 (5:6) 16 (26) Dyslexia versus controls: 44% Groups matched on parental education level
IQ (WISC III block design) .00
Vocabulary knowledge (WISC III vocabulary) −.40
Spelling (spelling test Dudal, 1997) −1.92
6:10 (6:10) Word reading (word reading test) −2.53
20 (26) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Matched
5:6 (5:6) IQ (WISC III block design) .00
Language comprehension (WISC III vocabulary) .00
6:10 (6:10) Spelling (spelling test Dudal, 1997) −.59
Word reading (word reading test) −.43
Boets, Wouters, van Wieringen, et al., 2007 (1) Dyslexia versus controls: 29%/.09% At least one first-degree relative diagnosed with dyslexia Significant differences in maternal or paternal level between the at-risk group and the control group
63 (64) 9 (28) Rhyme awareness (rhyme identity) −1.00
Auditory processing (speech perception) −.80
IQ (Raven CPM) −.23
Phon Aw (composite phoneme and rhyme identity tasks) −1.29
Phon memory (Dutch adaption of CN Rep) −.85
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) −.95
64 (64) 22 (28) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: At least one first-degree relative diagnosed with dyslexia
Rhyme awareness (rhyme identity) −.21
Auditory processing (speech perception) −.55
IQ (Raven CPM) −.33
Phon Aw (composite phoneme and rhyme identity tasks) −.65
Phon memory (Dutch adaption of CN Rep) −.67
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) −.50
Carroll, Mundy, & Cunningham, 2014 67.67 (64.12) 78 (17) Dyslexia versus controls: 44.7%/17% At least one first-degree relative diagnosed with dyslexia after a professional assessment
Articulatory accuracy (judging pronunciation of words) −1.09
Phon Aw (phoneme matching) −.83
Phon memory (CN Rep) −1.27
Vocabulary knowledge (CELF) −1.34
Letter knowledge −.51
Word reading (YARC) −2.81
Reading comprehension (YARC) −1.11
78 (21) Unaffected family-risk versus controls:
Articulatory accuracy (judging pronunciation of words) −.34
Phon Aw (phoneme matching) −.11
Phon memory (CN Rep) −.07
Vocabulary knowledge (CELF) −.37
Letter knowledge −.00
Word reading (YARC) −.51
Reading comprehension (YARC) −.42
de Bree, Wijnen, & Gerrits, 2010 (13) Dyslexia versus controls: −1.16 50%/22% Standardized tests of parents
4:4 (4:5) 19 (23) Phon memory (Dutch version of Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998)
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Standardized tests of parents
4:4 (4:5) 19 (23) Phon memory (Dutch version of Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998) −.66
Elbro & Petersen, 2004 (4) 7th grade 47 (41) Only prevalence included in the meta-analysis since test data were reported for at-risk children versus controls 55%/20% Self-report and test Fathers in the not-at-risk group had significantly higher education than fathers in the at-risk group
Elbro, Borstrøm, & Petersen, 1998 (4) Dyslexia versus controls: 37%/11% Self-report and test Fathers in the not-at-risk group had significantly higher education than fathers in the at-risk group
2nd grade 18 (42) Articulatory accuracy (articulatory skills) grammar (inflection formation) IQ (Raven) letter knowledge −.59
Phon Aw (phoneme discrimination) RAN (picture naming) vocabulary knowledge (language PPVT) −.59
vSTM (WISC-R) −.26
−1.17
−.89
−.48
−.90
−.81
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Self-report and test Fathers in the not-at-risk group had significantly higher education than fathers in the at-risk group
2nd grade 31 (42) Articulatory accuracy (articulatory skills) −.59
Grammar (inflection formation) −.27
IQ (Raven) −.26
Letter knowledge −.63
Phon Aw (phoneme discrimination) −.47
RAN (picture naming) −.51
Vocabulary knowledge (language PPVT) −.37
vSTM (WISC-R) −.20
Gallagher, Frith, & Snowling, 2000 (5) Dyslexia versus controls: 66%/16% Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
6 years (6 years) 63 (34) Rhyme awareness (rhyme knowledge) vSTM (digit span forward) −1.00
45 months −1.35
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: 66%/16% Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
6 years (6 years) Rhyme awareness (rhyme knowledge) vSTM (digit span forward) −.22
45 months −.35
Ho, Leung, & Cheung, 2011 36 (25) Dyslexia versus controls: 47% Confirmed with standardized testing At-risk parents had significantly lower education and income than the controls
5:9 (6:18) IQ (Raven CPM) .55
Vocabulary knowledge (adapted word definitions) −.67
Vocabulary knowledge (picture vocabulary) −1.17
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) −1.36
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) −.58
Spelling (Chinese spelling) −2.40
Word reading (Chinese word reading) −1.82
40 (25) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing At-risk parents had significantly lower education and income than the controls
6:6 (6:18) IQ (Raven CPM) −.17
Vocabulary knowledge (adapted word definitions) −.14
Vocabulary knowledge (picture vocabulary) −.29
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) −.23
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) −.05
Spelling (Chinese spelling) −.11
Word reading (Chinese word reading) .15
Leppänen, Hämäläinen, et al., 2010 (3) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
3.5 (3.5) 8 (25) Phon Aw (composite PA) −.85
5.0 (5.0) vSTM (composite vSTM) −.86
5.5 (5.5) RAN (composite RAN) −1.61
9.0 (9.0) Word reading (composite word reading accuracy and fluency) −2.78
Spelling (composite) −1.94
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
3.5 (3.5) 14 (25) Phon Aw (composite) −.83
5.0 (5.0) vSTM (composite) −.39
5.5 (5.5) RAN (composite) −.15
9.0 (9.0) Spelling (composite) −.02
Word reading (composite word reading accuracy and fluency) −.05
McBride-Change et al., 2011 (9) Dyslexia versus controls: Merged at-risk sample, both family-risk and delayed language development
Kgarten 26 (47) IQ (not specified) .23
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) −.54
RAN (digits) −1.13
Visual skills (Gardener test of visual perception) −.34
7:3 Word reading (Chinese character reading) −2.50
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Merged at-risk sample, both family-risk and delayed language development
Kgarten 21 (47) IQ (not specified) .03
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) −.41
RAN (digits) −.56
Visual skills (Gardener test of visual perception) −.08
7:3 Word reading (Chinese character reading) −.33
Pennala, Eklund, et al., 2010 (3) 3rd grade 33 (77) Dyslexia versus controls:
Phon memory (NEPSY nonrep) −.21 Confirmed with standardized testing
RAN (naming speed composite) −.70
Spelling (word spelling) −1.85
Word reading (word reading accuracy) −2.39
3rd grade 68 (80) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
Phon memory (nonrep NEPSY) −.05
RAN (nonrep composite) −.00
Spelling (word spelling) −.37
Word reading (word reading accuracy) −.28
Pennington & Lefly, 2001 (6) Dyslexia versus controls 34%/.06% Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing Matched on SES
5:4 (5:3) 22 (54) Letter knowledge (letter name knowledge) −1.32
5:4 (5:3) 42 (54) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing Matched on SES
Letter knowledge (letter names) −.08
End of second grade 22 (54) Dyslexia versus controls: Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing Matched on SES
IQ (WISC vocabulary and block design subtests) −.31
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) −1.29
Spelling (WRAT spelling) −1.89
Word reading (WJ letter word identification) −1.75
End of second grade 42 (54) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing Matched on SES
IQ (WISC vocabulary and block design subtests) −.22
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) −.39
Spelling (WRAT spelling) −.69
Word reading (WJ letter word identification) −.50
Plakas, van Zuijen, et al., 2013 (2) 3:4 (3:4) 10 (13) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
IQ (SON-R) −.60
Language comprehension (Reynell) −.74
Phon Aw (deletion) −2.37
vSTM (word span) −.80
3:4 (3:4) 15 (13) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
IQ (SON-R) −.22
Language comprehension (Reynell) .26
Phon Aw (deletion) −.52
vSTM (word span) .26
Plakas, van Zuijen, et al., 2013 (2) 41 months 15 (13) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
Grammar (expressive syntax) .17
Regtvoort, van Leeuwen, et al., 2006 (2) 5:6 (5) 11 (12) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
Nonword reading (1-min nonword reading test) −.99
Spelling (spelling test) −1.84
Word reading (1-min reading test) −2.72
5:6 (5) 15 (12) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing
Nonword reading (1-min nonword reading test) −.72
Spelling (spelling test) −.29
Word reading (1 min reading test) −.16
Scarborough, 1990 (7) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Matched on SES
30 months 20 (20) Articulatory accuracy (consonant errors) −1.01
Vocabulary knowledge (BNT) −.50
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) −.86
2nd grade IQ (WISC) −.42
Word reading (WJ reading cluster) −2.99
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Matched on SES
30 months 12 (20) Articulatory accuracy (consonant errors) −.08
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) −.20
Vocabulary knowledge (BNT) −.32
2nd grade IQ (WISC) .28
Word reading (WJ reading cluster) −.03
Scarborough, 1991a (7) 2nd grade 35 (44) Only prevalence coded since means and SDs on single tests were not reported. 65%/.05% Confirmed with standardized testing Matched on SES
Smith, 2009 (8) 8:9 (8:9) 10 (7) Dyslexia versus controls: 58% Confirmed with standardized testing Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level than mothers in control sample
Maternal education −1.20
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) −.78
Word reading (WRMT-R word ID) −2.56
Reading comprehension −2.30
8:9 (8:9) 10 (7) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: −1.83 Confirmed with standardized testing Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level than mothers in control sample
Maternal education .75
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) .30
Word reading (WRMT-R word ID) .36
Reading comprehension
Smith, Roberts, Locke, & Tozer, 2010 (8) 8–19 months 6 (5) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level
Articulatory accuracy (syllable index score) −.71
Language comprehension (general conceptual ability) −.88
Smith, Smith, et al., 2008 (8) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level
Age 2–3 9 (9) Vocabulary knowledge (DAS expressive vocabulary) −.71
IQ (Bayley comprehension) −.60
Vocabulary knowledge (DAS language comprehension) −.95
vSTM (DAS digit recall) −.79
Nonword reading (WRMT word attack) −2.96
Reading comprehension (GORT −1.17
Grade school Word reading (WRMT word ID) −5.46
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level
Age 2–3 9 (9) Vocabulary knowledge (DAS expressive vocabulary) −.88
IQ (Bayley comprehension) .19
Vocabulary knowledge (DAS language comprehension) −1.08
vSTM (DAS digit recall) −.58
Grade school Nonword reading (WRMT word attack) −.42
Reading comprehension (GORT −.19
Word reading (WRMT word ID) −.69
Snowling et al., 2003 (5) 3:9 (3:9) 37 (25) Dyslexia versus controls: 66%/16% Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
Articulatory accuracy (Edinburgh articulation test) −.14
Rhyme awareness (nursery rhymes) −1.20
IQ (Draw A Man [Harris, 1963]) −.45
Vocabulary knowledge (BPVS) −1.40
Letter knowledge (identify 26 letters by name and sound) −1.06
Phon Aw (nursery rhyme knowledge) −1.21
Phon memory (CN Rep) −.99
3:9 (3:9) 19 (25) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
Articulatory accuracy (Edinburgh articulation test) .20
Rhyme awareness (nursery rhymes) −.54
IQ (Draw a man (Harris, 1963) .62
Language comprehension (BPVS) −.40
Vocabulary knowledge (BPVS) −.40
Letter knowledge (identify 26 letters by name and sound) −.48
Phon Aw (nursery rhyme knowledge) −.54
Phon memory (CN Rep) −.53
8 years 37 (25) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
IQ (composite BAS Matrices and BAS Recall of Designs) −.65
Vocabulary knowledge (WOLD listening comprehension) −1.66
Nonword reading (Graded Nonword Reading Test [Snowling et al. 1996]) −2.36
Phon Aw (Phoneme deletion) −1.58
Phon memory (nonword repetition three and four syllable) −1.48
Reading comprehension (WORD reading comprehension) −3.04
Spelling (WORD spelling) −2.80
Word reading (WORD reading) −2.79
Rhyme awareness (rhyme oddity) −1.30
8 years 19 (25) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
IQ (composite BAS Matrices and BAS Recall of Designs) −.29
Vocabulary knowledge (WOLD listening comprehension) −.47
Nonword reading (Graded Nonword Reading Test (Snowling et al. 1996)) −1.29
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) −.80
Phon memory (nonword repetition three and four syllable) −.52
Reading comprehension (WORD reading comprehension) −1.02
Spelling (WORD spelling) −.25
Word reading (WORD reading) −.60
Rhyme awareness (rhyme oddity) −.24
Snowling, Muter, & Carroll, 2007 (5) 12–13 21 (17) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
Vocabulary knowledge (WASI vocabulary) −1.75
Nonword reading (from Griffiths & Snowling, 2001) −1.82
Phon Aw (Phoneme deletion) −1.36
Phon memory (CN Rep) −1.16
Reading comprehension (NARA) −1.05
Spelling (WORD spelling) −2.75
Word reading (exception word reading) −1.93
12–13 29 (17) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: −.43 Confirmed with standardized testing Middle-class volunteer sample
Vocabulary knowledge (WASI vocabulary) Nonword reading (from Griffiths & Snowling, 2001) −.37
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) −.26
Phon memory (CN Rep) −.21
Reading comprehension (NARA) −.10
Spelling (WORD spelling) −.89
Word reading (exception word reading) −.80
Torppa, Lyytinen, Erskine, et al., 2010 (3) 5 years 37 (84) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with testing Mothers of the children in the dyslexia affected group had on average a lower education level than children in the two other groups
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) −.65
Letter knowledge (nonstandardized task) −1.35
Phon Aw (phonological sensitivity [NEPSY]) −.76
RAN (Denckla & Rudel, 1976) −1.06
Grammar (inflectional morphology adverb and past tense) −.79
5 years 68 (84) Unaffected family-risk versus controls:
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) −.32
Letter knowledge (nonstandardized task) −.33
Phon Aw (phonological sensitivity [NEPSY]) −.28
RAN (Denckla & Rudel, 1976) −.25
Grammar (inflectional morphology adverb and past tense) −.37
Second grade 37 (84) Dyslexia versus controls: 35%/10% Confirmed with testing Mothers of the children in the dyslexia affected group had on average a lower education level than children in the two other groups
Nonword reading (nonword reading) −1.65
Spelling (spelling words and nonwords) −1.71
Word reading (word reading accuracy in meaningful text) −1.38
Second grade 68 (84) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with testing Mothers of the children in the dyslexia affected group had on average a lower education level than children in the two other groups
Nonword reading (nonword reading) −.17
Spelling (spelling words and nonwords) −.16
Word reading (word reading accuracy in meaningful text) −.04
van Bergen, de Jong, Plakas, et al., 2012 (2) 48 (48) 42 (66) Dyslexia versus controls: 30%/.03% Confirmed with testing Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample
IQ (SON-R nonverbal IQ test) −.53
Unaffected family-risk versus controls:
IQ (SON-R nonverbal IQ test) −.03
98 (96) 42 (66) Dyslexia versus controls: Confirmed with testing Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample
Nonword reading (nonword reading accuracy [de Jong & Wolters, 2002]) −2.06
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) −1.84
RAN (digits and colors) −.98
Spelling (write down words presented in a sentence) −1.74
Word reading (word reading accuracy test) −2.42
98 (96) 99 (66) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with testing Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample
Nonword reading (nonword reading accuracy [de Jong & Wolters, 2002]) −.56
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) −.66
RAN (digits and colors) −.15
Spelling (write down words presented in a sentence) −.37
Word reading (word reading accuracy test) −.64
van Bergen, de Jong, Regtvoort et al. 2011 (2) 70.4 (70) 22 (12) Dyslexia versus controls: 32% Confirmed with testing Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample
Letter knowledge (receptive letter knowledge task) −1.42
Phon Aw (phoneme blending and segmentation) −.10
RAN (colors and object) −1.39
Word reading (3 min reading test) −3.13
70.6 (70) 45 (12) Unaffected family-risk versus controls: Confirmed with testing Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample
Letter knowledge (receptive letter knowledge task) −.54
Phon Aw (phoneme blending and segmentation) .02
RAN (colors and object) −.64
Word reading (3 min reading test) −2.16
Dyslexia versus controls:
Grade 1 22 (12) IQ (Raven) −.37
Language comprehension (similar to PPVT) −.11
Grade 5 22 (12) Nonword reading (2 min pseudoword test) −4.60
Grade 1 45 (12) Unaffected family-risk versus controls:
IQ (Raven) −.22
Grade 5 45 (12) Language comprehension (similar to PPVT) −.09
Nonword reading (2 min pseudoword test) −2.92