Blomert & Willems, 2010 |
Kgarten |
53 (47) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
44%/.09% |
Parental questionnaire, sibling with a diagnosis of dyslexia |
— |
|
|
Articulatory accuracy (pronounce a word correctly after parts have been deleted) |
.09 |
|
|
|
|
IQ (general intelligence test not specified) Verbal short term memory (word span) |
|
|
|
|
|
Receptive vocabulary (test not specified) |
.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Letter knowledge (correctly name or sound out visual presented letters) |
.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (blend phonemes or phoneme strings) |
.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.10 |
|
|
|
Boets, De Smedt, et al., 2010 (1) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
— |
Maternal and paternal education are measured |
5.33 (5.33) |
16 (26) |
IQ (Raven) |
−.32 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (composite PA) |
−1.37 |
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−1.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (colors and objects) |
−.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
vSTM (digit span) |
−.40 |
|
|
|
|
1st grade |
|
Vocabulary knowledge (WISC vocabulary) |
−.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (nonword reading fluency) |
−1.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paternal education |
.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maternal education |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
44% |
— |
Maternal and paternal education are measured |
|
5.33 (5.33) |
20 (26) |
IQ (Raven) |
−.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (composite PA) |
−.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (colors and objects) |
−.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
vSTM (digit span) |
.25 |
|
|
|
|
1st grade |
|
Vocabulary knowledge (WISC vocabulary) |
−.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (nonword reading fluency) |
−.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paternal education |
−.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maternal education |
.00 |
|
|
|
Boets, Vandermosten, et al., 2011 (1) |
5:6 (5:6) |
16 (26) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
44% |
— |
Groups matched on parental education level |
|
|
IQ (WISC III block design) |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (WISC III vocabulary) |
−.40 |
|
|
|
|
Spelling (spelling test Dudal, 1997) |
−1.92 |
|
|
|
6:10 (6:10) |
|
Word reading (word reading test) |
−2.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 (26) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
|
Matched |
|
5:6 (5:6) |
|
IQ (WISC III block design) |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Language comprehension (WISC III vocabulary) |
.00 |
|
|
|
|
6:10 (6:10) |
|
Spelling (spelling test Dudal, 1997) |
−.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (word reading test) |
−.43 |
|
|
|
Boets, Wouters, van Wieringen, et al., 2007 (1) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
29%/.09% |
At least one first-degree relative diagnosed with dyslexia |
Significant differences in maternal or paternal level between the at-risk group and the control group |
63 (64) |
9 (28) |
Rhyme awareness (rhyme identity) |
−1.00 |
|
|
|
Auditory processing (speech perception) |
−.80 |
|
|
|
IQ (Raven CPM) |
−.23 |
|
|
|
Phon Aw (composite phoneme and rhyme identity tasks) |
−1.29 |
|
|
|
Phon memory (Dutch adaption of CN Rep) |
−.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) |
−.95 |
|
|
|
|
64 (64) |
22 (28) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
— |
At least one first-degree relative diagnosed with dyslexia |
|
|
|
|
Rhyme awareness (rhyme identity) |
−.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auditory processing (speech perception) |
−.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
IQ (Raven CPM) |
−.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (composite phoneme and rhyme identity tasks) |
−.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (Dutch adaption of CN Rep) |
−.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) |
−.50 |
|
|
|
Carroll, Mundy, & Cunningham, 2014 |
67.67 (64.12) |
78 (17) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
44.7%/17% |
At least one first-degree relative diagnosed with dyslexia after a professional assessment |
|
|
|
Articulatory accuracy (judging pronunciation of words) |
−1.09 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme matching) |
−.83 |
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−1.27 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (CELF) |
−1.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Letter knowledge |
−.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (YARC) |
−2.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (YARC) |
−1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
78 (21) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Articulatory accuracy (judging pronunciation of words) |
−.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme matching) |
−.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (CELF) |
−.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter knowledge |
−.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (YARC) |
−.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (YARC) |
−.42 |
|
|
|
de Bree, Wijnen, & Gerrits, 2010 (13) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
−1.16 |
50%/22% |
Standardized tests of parents |
— |
4:4 (4:5) |
19 (23) |
Phon memory (Dutch version of Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
— |
Standardized tests of parents |
— |
|
4:4 (4:5) |
19 (23) |
Phon memory (Dutch version of Dollaghan & Campbell, 1998) |
−.66 |
|
|
Elbro & Petersen, 2004 (4) |
7th grade |
47 (41) |
Only prevalence included in the meta-analysis since test data were reported for at-risk children versus controls |
— |
55%/20% |
Self-report and test |
Fathers in the not-at-risk group had significantly higher education than fathers in the at-risk group |
Elbro, Borstrøm, & Petersen, 1998 (4) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
37%/11% |
Self-report and test |
Fathers in the not-at-risk group had significantly higher education than fathers in the at-risk group |
2nd grade |
18 (42) |
Articulatory accuracy (articulatory skills) grammar (inflection formation) IQ (Raven) letter knowledge |
−.59 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme discrimination) RAN (picture naming) vocabulary knowledge (language PPVT) |
−.59 |
|
|
|
|
vSTM (WISC-R) |
−.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
−1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
−.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
−.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
−.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
−.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Self-report and test |
Fathers in the not-at-risk group had significantly higher education than fathers in the at-risk group |
|
2nd grade |
31 (42) |
Articulatory accuracy (articulatory skills) |
−.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar (inflection formation) |
−.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
IQ (Raven) |
−.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Letter knowledge |
−.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme discrimination) |
−.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (picture naming) |
−.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (language PPVT) |
−.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
vSTM (WISC-R) |
−.20 |
|
|
Gallagher, Frith, & Snowling, 2000 (5) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
66%/16% |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
6 years (6 years) |
63 (34) |
Rhyme awareness (rhyme knowledge) vSTM (digit span forward) |
−1.00 |
|
45 months |
|
−1.35 |
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
66%/16% |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
|
6 years (6 years) |
|
Rhyme awareness (rhyme knowledge) vSTM (digit span forward) |
−.22 |
|
|
45 months |
|
−.35 |
|
|
|
Ho, Leung, & Cheung, 2011 |
|
36 (25) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
47% |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
At-risk parents had significantly lower education and income than the controls |
5:9 (6:18) |
|
IQ (Raven CPM) |
.55 |
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (adapted word definitions) |
−.67 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (picture vocabulary) |
−1.17 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) |
−1.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) |
−.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (Chinese spelling) |
−2.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (Chinese word reading) |
−1.82 |
|
|
|
|
40 (25) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
At-risk parents had significantly lower education and income than the controls |
|
6:6 (6:18) |
|
IQ (Raven CPM) |
−.17 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (adapted word definitions) |
−.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (picture vocabulary) |
−.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) |
−.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (rapid naming of colors and objects) |
−.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (Chinese spelling) |
−.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (Chinese word reading) |
.15 |
|
|
|
Leppänen, Hämäläinen, et al., 2010 (3) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
— |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
— |
3.5 (3.5) |
8 (25) |
Phon Aw (composite PA) |
−.85 |
|
|
5.0 (5.0) |
|
vSTM (composite vSTM) |
−.86 |
|
|
|
|
5.5 (5.5) |
|
RAN (composite RAN) |
−1.61 |
|
|
|
|
9.0 (9.0) |
|
Word reading (composite word reading accuracy and fluency) |
−2.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (composite) |
−1.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
— |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
|
|
3.5 (3.5) |
14 (25) |
Phon Aw (composite) |
−.83 |
|
|
|
5.0 (5.0) |
|
vSTM (composite) |
−.39 |
|
|
|
|
5.5 (5.5) |
|
RAN (composite) |
−.15 |
|
|
|
|
9.0 (9.0) |
|
Spelling (composite) |
−.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (composite word reading accuracy and fluency) |
−.05 |
|
|
|
McBride-Change et al., 2011 (9) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Merged at-risk sample, both family-risk and delayed language development |
— |
Kgarten |
26 (47) |
IQ (not specified) |
.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) |
−.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (digits) |
−1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Visual skills (Gardener test of visual perception) |
−.34 |
|
|
|
|
7:3 |
|
Word reading (Chinese character reading) |
−2.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Merged at-risk sample, both family-risk and delayed language development |
— |
|
Kgarten |
21 (47) |
IQ (not specified) |
.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (syllable deletion) |
−.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (digits) |
−.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Visual skills (Gardener test of visual perception) |
−.08 |
|
|
|
|
7:3 |
|
Word reading (Chinese character reading) |
−.33 |
|
|
|
Pennala, Eklund, et al., 2010 (3) |
3rd grade |
33 (77) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
Phon memory (NEPSY nonrep) |
−.21 |
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
|
|
|
RAN (naming speed composite) |
−.70 |
|
|
|
|
Spelling (word spelling) |
−1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (word reading accuracy) |
−2.39 |
|
|
|
|
3rd grade |
68 (80) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
— |
|
|
|
Phon memory (nonrep NEPSY) |
−.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (nonrep composite) |
−.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (word spelling) |
−.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (word reading accuracy) |
−.28 |
|
|
|
Pennington & Lefly, 2001 (6) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls |
|
34%/.06% |
Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing |
Matched on SES |
5:4 (5:3) |
22 (54) |
Letter knowledge (letter name knowledge) |
−1.32 |
|
5:4 (5:3) |
42 (54) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing |
Matched on SES |
|
|
Letter knowledge (letter names) |
−.08 |
|
End of second grade |
22 (54) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing |
Matched on SES |
|
IQ (WISC vocabulary and block design subtests) |
−.31 |
|
|
|
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) |
−1.29 |
|
|
|
|
Spelling (WRAT spelling) |
−1.89 |
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WJ letter word identification) |
−1.75 |
|
|
|
|
End of second grade |
42 (54) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Reading history questionnaire that in cases of doubt were supplemented by testing |
Matched on SES |
|
|
IQ (WISC vocabulary and block design subtests) |
−.22 |
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) |
−.39 |
|
|
|
|
Spelling (WRAT spelling) |
−.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WJ letter word identification) |
−.50 |
|
|
|
Plakas, van Zuijen, et al., 2013 (2) |
3:4 (3:4) |
10 (13) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
— |
|
|
IQ (SON-R) |
−.60 |
|
|
|
|
Language comprehension (Reynell) |
−.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (deletion) |
−2.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
vSTM (word span) |
−.80 |
|
|
|
|
3:4 (3:4) |
15 (13) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
— |
|
|
|
IQ (SON-R) |
−.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Language comprehension (Reynell) |
.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (deletion) |
−.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
vSTM (word span) |
.26 |
|
|
|
Plakas, van Zuijen, et al., 2013 (2) |
41 months |
15 (13) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
— |
|
|
Grammar (expressive syntax) |
.17 |
|
|
Regtvoort, van Leeuwen, et al., 2006 (2) |
5:6 (5) |
11 (12) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
— |
|
|
Nonword reading (1-min nonword reading test) |
−.99 |
|
|
|
|
Spelling (spelling test) |
−1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (1-min reading test) |
−2.72 |
|
|
|
|
5:6 (5) |
15 (12) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
— |
|
|
|
Nonword reading (1-min nonword reading test) |
−.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (spelling test) |
−.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (1 min reading test) |
−.16 |
|
|
|
Scarborough, 1990 (7) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Matched on SES |
30 months |
20 (20) |
Articulatory accuracy (consonant errors) |
−1.01 |
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (BNT) |
−.50 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) |
−.86 |
|
|
|
|
2nd grade |
|
IQ (WISC) |
−.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WJ reading cluster) |
−2.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Matched on SES |
|
30 months |
12 (20) |
Articulatory accuracy (consonant errors) |
−.08 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) |
−.20 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (BNT) |
−.32 |
|
|
|
|
2nd grade |
|
IQ (WISC) |
.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WJ reading cluster) |
−.03 |
|
|
|
Scarborough, 1991a (7) |
2nd grade |
35 (44) |
Only prevalence coded since means and SDs on single tests were not reported. |
|
65%/.05% |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Matched on SES |
Smith, 2009 (8) |
8:9 (8:9) |
10 (7) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
58% |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level than mothers in control sample |
|
|
Maternal education |
−1.20 |
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) |
−.78 |
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WRMT-R word ID) |
−2.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension |
−2.30 |
|
|
|
8:9 (8:9) |
10 (7) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
−1.83 |
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level than mothers in control sample |
|
|
|
Maternal education |
.75 |
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (WJ word attack) |
.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WRMT-R word ID) |
.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension |
|
|
|
Smith, Roberts, Locke, & Tozer, 2010 (8) |
8–19 months |
6 (5) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level |
|
|
Articulatory accuracy (syllable index score) |
−.71 |
|
|
|
Language comprehension (general conceptual ability) |
−.88 |
|
Smith, Smith, et al., 2008 (8) |
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level |
Age 2–3 |
9 (9) |
Vocabulary knowledge (DAS expressive vocabulary) |
−.71 |
|
|
|
IQ (Bayley comprehension) |
−.60 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (DAS language comprehension) |
−.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
vSTM (DAS digit recall) |
−.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (WRMT word attack) |
−2.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (GORT |
−1.17 |
|
|
|
Grade school |
|
Word reading (WRMT word ID) |
−5.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Mothers in high-risk sample had significantly lower education level |
|
Age 2–3 |
9 (9) |
Vocabulary knowledge (DAS expressive vocabulary) |
−.88 |
|
|
|
|
IQ (Bayley comprehension) |
.19 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (DAS language comprehension) |
−1.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
vSTM (DAS digit recall) |
−.58 |
|
|
|
Grade school |
|
Nonword reading (WRMT word attack) |
−.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (GORT |
−.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WRMT word ID) |
−.69 |
|
|
|
Snowling et al., 2003 (5) |
3:9 (3:9) |
37 (25) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
66%/16% |
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
|
|
Articulatory accuracy (Edinburgh articulation test) |
−.14 |
|
|
|
Rhyme awareness (nursery rhymes) |
−1.20 |
|
|
|
IQ (Draw A Man [Harris, 1963]) |
−.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (BPVS) |
−1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter knowledge (identify 26 letters by name and sound) |
−1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (nursery rhyme knowledge) |
−1.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−.99 |
|
|
|
|
3:9 (3:9) |
19 (25) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
|
|
|
Articulatory accuracy (Edinburgh articulation test) |
.20 |
|
|
|
|
Rhyme awareness (nursery rhymes) |
−.54 |
|
|
|
|
IQ (Draw a man (Harris, 1963) |
.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Language comprehension (BPVS) |
−.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (BPVS) |
−.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letter knowledge (identify 26 letters by name and sound) |
−.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (nursery rhyme knowledge) |
−.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−.53 |
|
|
|
|
8 years |
37 (25) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
|
|
|
IQ (composite BAS Matrices and BAS Recall of Designs) |
−.65 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (WOLD listening comprehension) |
−1.66 |
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (Graded Nonword Reading Test [Snowling et al. 1996]) |
−2.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (Phoneme deletion) |
−1.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (nonword repetition three and four syllable) |
−1.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (WORD reading comprehension) |
−3.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (WORD spelling) |
−2.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WORD reading) |
−2.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhyme awareness (rhyme oddity) |
−1.30 |
|
|
|
|
8 years |
19 (25) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
|
|
|
IQ (composite BAS Matrices and BAS Recall of Designs) |
−.29 |
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (WOLD listening comprehension) |
−.47 |
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (Graded Nonword Reading Test (Snowling et al. 1996)) |
−1.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) |
−.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (nonword repetition three and four syllable) |
−.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (WORD reading comprehension) |
−1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (WORD spelling) |
−.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (WORD reading) |
−.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rhyme awareness (rhyme oddity) |
−.24 |
|
|
|
Snowling, Muter, & Carroll, 2007 (5) |
12–13 |
21 (17) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (WASI vocabulary) |
−1.75 |
|
|
|
Nonword reading (from Griffiths & Snowling, 2001) |
−1.82 |
|
|
|
Phon Aw (Phoneme deletion) |
−1.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−1.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (NARA) |
−1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (WORD spelling) |
−2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (exception word reading) |
−1.93 |
|
|
|
|
12–13 |
29 (17) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
−.43 |
|
Confirmed with standardized testing |
Middle-class volunteer sample |
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (WASI vocabulary) Nonword reading (from Griffiths & Snowling, 2001) |
−.37 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) |
−.26 |
|
|
|
|
Phon memory (CN Rep) |
−.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading comprehension (NARA) |
−.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (WORD spelling) |
−.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (exception word reading) |
−.80 |
|
|
|
Torppa, Lyytinen, Erskine, et al., 2010 (3) |
5 years |
37 (84) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with testing |
Mothers of the children in the dyslexia affected group had on average a lower education level than children in the two other groups |
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) |
−.65 |
|
|
|
Letter knowledge (nonstandardized task) |
−1.35 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phonological sensitivity [NEPSY]) |
−.76 |
|
|
|
|
RAN (Denckla & Rudel, 1976) |
−1.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar (inflectional morphology adverb and past tense) |
−.79 |
|
|
|
5 years |
68 (84) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vocabulary knowledge (PPVT) |
−.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Letter knowledge (nonstandardized task) |
−.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phonological sensitivity [NEPSY]) |
−.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (Denckla & Rudel, 1976) |
−.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar (inflectional morphology adverb and past tense) |
−.37 |
|
|
|
Second grade |
37 (84) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
35%/10% |
Confirmed with testing |
Mothers of the children in the dyslexia affected group had on average a lower education level than children in the two other groups |
|
|
|
Nonword reading (nonword reading) |
−1.65 |
|
|
|
|
Spelling (spelling words and nonwords) |
−1.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (word reading accuracy in meaningful text) |
−1.38 |
|
|
|
Second grade |
68 (84) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with testing |
Mothers of the children in the dyslexia affected group had on average a lower education level than children in the two other groups |
|
|
|
Nonword reading (nonword reading) |
−.17 |
|
|
|
|
Spelling (spelling words and nonwords) |
−.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (word reading accuracy in meaningful text) |
−.04 |
|
|
van Bergen, de Jong, Plakas, et al., 2012 (2) |
48 (48) |
42 (66) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
30%/.03% |
Confirmed with testing |
Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample |
|
|
IQ (SON-R nonverbal IQ test) |
−.53 |
|
|
|
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
|
|
|
IQ (SON-R nonverbal IQ test) |
−.03 |
|
|
98 (96) |
42 (66) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with testing |
Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample |
|
|
|
Nonword reading (nonword reading accuracy [de Jong & Wolters, 2002]) |
−2.06 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) |
−1.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (digits and colors) |
−.98 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (write down words presented in a sentence) |
−1.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (word reading accuracy test) |
−2.42 |
|
|
|
98 (96) |
99 (66) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with testing |
Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample |
|
|
|
Nonword reading (nonword reading accuracy [de Jong & Wolters, 2002]) |
−.56 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme deletion) |
−.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (digits and colors) |
−.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling (write down words presented in a sentence) |
−.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (word reading accuracy test) |
−.64 |
|
|
van Bergen, de Jong, Regtvoort et al. 2011 (2) |
70.4 (70) |
22 (12) |
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
32% |
Confirmed with testing |
Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample |
|
|
Letter knowledge (receptive letter knowledge task) |
−1.42 |
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme blending and segmentation) |
−.10 |
|
|
|
|
RAN (colors and object) |
−1.39 |
|
|
|
|
Word reading (3 min reading test) |
−3.13 |
|
|
|
70.6 (70) |
45 (12) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
Confirmed with testing |
Children in at-risk group had parents (both mothers and fathers) with significantly lower education than in the control sample |
|
|
|
Letter knowledge (receptive letter knowledge task) |
−.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Phon Aw (phoneme blending and segmentation) |
.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
RAN (colors and object) |
−.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
Word reading (3 min reading test) |
−2.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dyslexia versus controls: |
|
|
|
|
Grade 1 |
22 (12) |
IQ (Raven) |
−.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Language comprehension (similar to PPVT) |
−.11 |
|
|
|
Grade 5 |
22 (12) |
Nonword reading (2 min pseudoword test) |
−4.60 |
|
|
|
Grade 1 |
45 (12) |
Unaffected family-risk versus controls: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IQ (Raven) |
−.22 |
|
|
|
Grade 5 |
45 (12) |
Language comprehension (similar to PPVT) |
−.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonword reading (2 min pseudoword test) |
−2.92 |
|
|
|