Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):e0152984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152984

Table 3. Genotype Effects on N100 Event-Related Potential (Cz).

Parameter DF F-Value Original P-Value Beta
Unconstrained Genetic Model
Sex 1 10.39 0.0013 Females 0.22
Study Center 6 26.89 <0.0001 -0.08 (AC)
0.39 (BE)
0.66 (BN)
0.09 (DU)
-0.24 (ER)
-0.34 (MA)
0.00 (MZ)
Genotype 2 16.06 <0.0001 -0.23 (TT)
-0.07 (TC)
0.00 (CC)
Sex*Genotype 2 1.58 0.2072 Females
-0.18 (TT)
-0.01 (TC)
0.00 (CC)
Recessive Genetic Model
Sex 1 6.12 0.0134 Females 0.21
Study Center 6 26.88 <0.0001 -0.08 (AC)
0.38 (BE)
0.66 (BN)
0.09 (DU)
-0.24 (ER)
-0.35 (MA)
0.00 (MZ)
Genotype 1 30.46 <0.0001 -0.18
Sex*Genotype 1 3.11 0.0782 Females-0.17

Linear Regression models after stepwise backward selection of variables (n = 1,705 subjects). Top: Unconstrained genetic model (DF = 11; p < .0001; R² = 0.11; β = 0.95). Bottom: Recessive genetic model (DF = 9; p < .0001; R² = 0.11; β = 0.90). AC = Aachen, BE = Berlin, BN = Bonn, DU = Düsseldorf, ER = Erlangen, MA = Mannheim, MZ = Mainz.