Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 7;11(4):e0152984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152984

Table 6. Genotype Effects on Reaction Time.

Parameter DF F-Value Original P-Value Beta
Unconstrained Genetic Model
Sex 1 0.13 0.7165 Females -1.09
Study Center 6 10.73 < .0001 -17.14 (AC)
-1.69 (BE)
-4.33 (BN)
-2.68 (DU)
-4.05 (ER)
33.43 (MA)
0.00 (MZ)
Genotype 2 1.25 0.2872 -9.44 (TT)
-1.88 (TC)
0.00 (CC)
Sex*Genotype 2 4.45 0.0118 Females)
16.55 (TT)
-9.06 (TC)
0.00 (CC
Recessive Genetic Model
Sex 1 0.98 0.3222 Females -7.48
Study Center 6 10.66 < .0001 -17.28 (AC)
-1.94 (BE)
-4.59 (BN)
-2.86 (DU)
-3.91 (ER)
33.20 (MA)
0.00 (MZ)
Genotype 1 0.68 0.4100 -8.15
Sex*Genotype 1 8.05 0.0046 Females 22.95

Linear Regression models fitted for N100 (Cz) performing stepwise backward selection of variables. Top: Unconstrained genetic model (DF = 11; p < .0001; R² = 0.04; β = 362.5; n = 1,818). Bottom: Recessive genetic model (DF = 9; p < .0001; R² = 0.04; β = 361.3; n = 1,818). AC = Aachen, BE = Berlin, BN = Bonn, DU = Düsseldorf, ER = Erlangen, MA = Mannheim, MZ = Mainz. The larger sample size (compared to the sample size with the N100 regression analyses) is due to subjects with available reaction time data but without artifact-free EEG from the original sample.