Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 May;55(5):551–593. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0340-9

Table 1.

MPA pharmacodynamic studies in adult alloHCT recipients receiving MMF as postgraft immunosuppressiona

Study Study population Immunosuppressant MPA PK methods MPA Pharmacodynamic results
Jenke et al., 200119 N=15
Ages
26–57 yr
Regimens
MA: N=15, varied
Donors
Related: N=9
URD: N=6
Graft sources
Marrow: N=3
PBSC: N=12
MMF dose
12.5 to 17 mg/kg IV through day +21, then 1000 mg orally

MMF frequency
BID: N=15

Other IS
CSA 2 mg/kg IV BID, TCI to whole blood C0 of 200–300 ng/mL by TDx immunoassay
Total or unbound
Total MPA only

Sampling days
Trough: Daily through day +21
AUC: Days +1,+ 7, +14, +21

AUC sampling times
IV: 1, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 12 h after morning dose
Oral: Not collected

Administration route for sampling
IV

Assay
LC-fluorescent detection
Data analysis
  • Analyzed both AUC and trough concentrations

Engraftment
  • Not evaluated

Rejection
  • Not evaluated

Chimerism
  • Not evaluated

Acute GVHD
  • Average MPA C0 between days +1 and +14 did not differ between patients experiencing grades 0–I acute GVHD and grades II–III acute GVHD

  • Patients with grades II–III acute GVHD <200 ng/mL always had C0

Chronic GHVD
  • Not evaluated

NRM
  • Not evaluated

Relapse
  • Not evaluated

OS
  • Not evaluated


Jacobson et al., 200511 N=87
Ages
19–69 yr
Conditioning
NMA:
N=87, BU or CY + FLU/TBI
Donors
Related: N=33
URD: N=54
Graft sources
Marrow: N=4
PBSC: N=33
UCB: N=50 (single or double unit not specified)
MMF dose
1000 mg oral or IV (if could not tolerate oral)

MMF frequency
BID: N=87

Other IS
CSA 2.5 mg/kg IV BID, TCI to whole blood C0 of 200–400 ng/mL by HPLC
Total or unbound
Total and unbound

Sampling days
Trough: with AUCs, then weekly until day +30
AUC: Once pre-transplant (between days −9 and −6), once after transplant (between days +3 and +7)

AUC sampling times
IV: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12h after infusion
Oral: 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12h after dose
Note: additional sample collected at 24h for pre-transplant AUC only

Administration route for sampling
IV or oral

Assay
HPLC-UV; assay accuracy 96–117.5%
Data analysis
  • Pre- and post-transplant AUCs

Engraftment
  • All engraftment failures occurred in UCB

  • Total MPA C0 increasing by 1 μg/mL increased likelihood of engraftment by 58% (p=0.05)

  • Higher engraftment associated with total MPA C0 >1 μg/mL (p <0.01)

Rejection
  • Not evaluated

Chimerism
  • Not evaluated

Acute GVHD
  • Unbound MPA AUC0–6h< 150 ng×h/mL associated with higher cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute GVHD vs. AUC0–6h> 150 ng×h/mL (68% vs. 40%, p=0.02)

  • Unbound AUC0–12h <300 ng×h/mL associated with more frequent acute GVHD (58% vs. 35%, p=0.05)

  • No association between GVHD and C0 (p≤0.62)

  • No association between total or unbound C0 and grades II–IV or grades III–IV acute GVHD (p≥0.17)

Chronic GHVD
  • Not evaluated

NRM
  • Not evaluated

Relapse
  • Not evaluated

OS
  • Not evaluated

Frymoyer et al., 201226 N=132
Ages
19–69 yr
Conditioning
NMA: N=132, CY/FLU/TBI
Donors
Related: N=43
URD: N=89
Graft sources
Marrow: N=8
PBSC: N=42
UCB: N=82
MMF dose
1000 mg BID or TID or 1500 mg BID

MMF frequency
BID: N=113
TID: N=19
Other IS
CSA 2.5 mg/kg IV BID, TCI to C0 of 200–400 ng/mL
Total or unbound
Unbound MPA only

Sampling days
Trough: With AUCs
AUC: Variable, up to day +7; estimated unbound AUC0–24h

AUC sampling times
IV: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12h after infusion
Oral: 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12h after dose
Note: 12h samples not collected in TID patients

Administration route for sampling
IV or PO
Data analysis
  • PopPK model created with unbound MPA concentrations

  • Two-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination

  • MPA exposure defined by composite of that accounted for average daily AUC0–24h differences in exposure between oral and IV and time patient spent with each dosing route

Engraftment
  • No relationship was found between unbound MPA and engraftment

Rejection
  • Not evaluated

Chimerism
  • Not evaluated

Acute GVHD
  • Risk of grades II–IV acute GVHD decreased 16% for every 200 ng×h/mL increase in AUC0–24h (p=0.026)

  • Unbound MPA concentrations were not predictive of grades III–IV acute GVHD

Chronic GHVD
  • Not evaluated

NRM
  • Not evaluated

Relapse
  • Not evaluated

OS
  • Not evaluated

Other
  • Not evaluated

Giaccone et al., 200510 N=85
Ages
18–70 yr
Regimens
NMA: N=85, FLU/TBI
Donors
URD: N=85
Graft sources
Marrow: N=6
PBSC: N=79
MMF dose
15 mg/kg PO

MMF frequency
BID: N=38
TID: N=47

Other IS
CSA 6.25 mg PO BID, TCI to C0 of 500 ng/mL
Total or unbound
Both total and unbound

Sampling days
Trough: Days +7 and +21
AUC: Days +7 and +21; estimated total and unbound AUC0–8h or AUC0–12h

AUC sampling times
IV: Not collected
Oral: 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10h after morning dose
Note: 10h sample not collected in TID patients

Administration route for sampling
Oral
Data analysis
  • All AUC results divided by dosing interval to provide concentration at steady state (Css)

Engraftment
  • Engraftment and rejection worse with marrow compared to PBSC7, so recipients of marrow graft excluded from PD analysis

Rejection
  • 6 patients with total MPA Css <2.5 μg/mL had graft rejection (p=0.34)

Chimerism
  • 16 patients with a total MPA Css <3 μg/mL had low (< 50%) donor T-cell chimerism (p=0.03)

Acute GVHD
  • No association with total or unbound MPA Css

Chronic GHVD
  • Not evaluated

NRM
  • Not evaluated

Relapse
  • No association with total or unbound MPA Css

OS
  • Not evaluated

Other
  • Elevated unbound MPA Css associated with CMV reactivation (p=0.03)

McDermott et al., 201377 N=308
Ages
9.2–74.5 yr
Regimens
NMA:
N=308, TBI alone or FLU/TBI
Donors
Related: N=132
URD: N=176

Graft sources
Not specified
MMF dose
15mg/kg PO
MMF frequency
BID: N=167
TID: N=141
Other IS
CSA: N=251
TAC: N=57
Total or unbound
Both total and unbound

Sampling days
Trough: Days +7 and +21
AUC: Days +7 and +21; estimated AUC0–8h or AUC0–12h

AUC sampling times
IV: Not collected
Oral: 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10h after morning dose
Note: 10h sample not collected in TID patients

Administration route for sampling
Oral

Assay
LC-MS
Data analysis
  • All AUC results divided by dosing interval to provide concentration at steady state (Css)

Engraftment
  • Engraftment and rejection worse with marrow compared to PBSC7, so recipients of marrow graft excluded from PD analysis

Rejection
  • Occurred in 9 patients, 8 of whom had a total MPA Css <3 μg/mL (p=0.36)

Chimerism
  • Donor T-cell chimerism on day 28 had no association with total or unbound MPA Css

Acute GVHD
  • For recipients with an unrelated donor, risk of grades III–IV acute GVHD was higher with a total MPA Css <2.96 μg/mL

Chronic GVHD
  • Not evaluated

NRM
  • No association with total or unbound MPA Css

Relapse
  • No association with total or unbound MPA Css

OS
  • Not evaluated

Other
  • In patients receiving a related donor graft, total MPA Css, unbound MPA Css, and total MPA C0 were not associated with clinical outcomes

Harnicar et al., 201572 N=174
Ages
1–71 yr
Regimens
MA: N=136, varied
NMA: N=38, varied
Donors
URD: N=174
Graft sources
Double UCB: N=174
MMF dose
1000 mg IV in adults, 15–20 mg/kg/dose for children ≤12 years

MMF frequency
BID: N=81
TID: N=93

Other IS
CSA: Number not provided; CSA TCI to C0 of 200–400 ng/mL
TAC: Number not provided; TAC TCI to C0 of 5–12 ng/mL
Total or unbound
Total MPA only

Sampling days
Trough: Days
+1, +8, +15, +22, +29, and +36 (N=85)
AUC: Not collected

AUC sampling times
AUCs not collected

Administration route for sampling
IV

Assay
LC-MS
Data analysis
  • Subset analysis in 85 patients looking at weekly total MPA C0 through week 6 after alloHCT

Engraftment
  • No difference in the cumulative incidence of day +100 neutrophil engraftment in myeloablated patients with mean week 1 to 2 MPA C0 of <2 and ≥2 μg/mL (p=0.422)

  • No differences in platelet engraftment in myeloablated patients

Rejection
  • Not evaluated

Chimerism
  • Not evaluated

Acute GVHD
  • Cumulative incidence of grades II–IV acute GHVD by day +100 was higher in low-dose group than high-dose group (24% vs 8%, p=0.008)

  • No difference in the cumulative incidence of day +100 grades II–IV acute GVHD in MPA C0 groups of <0.5 (N=19) and ≥0.5 (N=64) μg/mL (p=0.611)

  • Difference in cumulative incidence of day +100 grades III–IV acute GVHD in MPA in MPA C0 groups of <0.5 (26%) and ≥0.5 μg/mL (9%, p=0.063)

Chronic GVHD
  • Not evaluated

NRM
  • Not evaluated

Relapse
  • Not evaluated

OS
  • Not evaluated

Other
  • No difference in duration of TPN in myeloablated patients with mean week 1 to 2 MPA C0 of <2 or ≥2 μg/mL

Arai et al., 201578 N=24
Ages
19–65 yr
Regimens
MA: N=8, varied
RIC: N=16, varied
Donors
URD: N=24
Graft sources
Single UCB: N=24
MMF dose
10 mg/kg PO

MMF frequency
TID: N=24

Other IS
CSA: N=1, CSA TCI not specified
TAC: N=23, TAC TCI not specified
Total or unbound
Total MPA only

Sampling days
Trough: Days +7 and +21
AUC: Days +7 and +21, estimated AUC0–24h by multiplying AUC0–8h × 3)

AUC sampling times
IV: Not collected
Oral: 0, 1, 2, 4, 8h after morning dose

Administration route for sampling
Oral

Assay
EMIT
Data analysis
  • MPA concentration quantified with EMIT

  • At week one and week three, patients were divided into two groups based on MPA AUC

  • The lower-concentration group defined as was below the patients whose MPA AUC 0–24h lower quartile (40μg×h/mL) in week 1 and week 3; remaining patients formed the higher-concentration group

Engraftment
  • No difference in cumulative incidence of pre-engraftment syndrome between lower-concentration and higher-concentration groups in the first week after alloHCT (14.3% vs 5.9%, p=0.53)

Rejection
  • Not evaluated

Chimerism
  • Not evaluated

Acute GVHD
  • Cumulative incidence of grades II–IV acute GVHD by day +100 was significantly higher patients in lower-concentration group in the third week than patients in higher-concentration group in the third week (75% vs 31.2%, p=0.02)

  • Difference between incidence of grades II–IV acute GVHD by day +100 in lower-and higher-concentration groups remained after adjusting for various confounders

  • Relative risk was 8.05 (95% CI: 1.09–59.7, p=0.04)

Chronic GVHD
  • Not evaluated

NRM
  • Not evaluated

Relapse
  • No difference in relapse rates between lower-concentration and higher-concentration groups (16.7% vs 22.8%, respectively; p=0.76)

OS
  • Not evaluated

Other
  • Authors found that a certain level of MPA is necessary to effectively prevent acute GVHD after UCB alloHCT

  • Suggested minimal requirement of an AUC0–24h of 40μg×h/mL in the third week after alloHCT

a

Excludes studies where MMF was used as treatment of GVHD,206209 where only PK results were reported,7,13,20,23,28,115,210, or where MMF doses were personalized to total MPA PK, specifically an AUC0–12h of 35–60 μg/mL/h13, C0 < 3.5 μg/mL,12 or C0 of 1 – 3.5 μg/mL.22

Abbreviations: alloHCT: allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation; AUC: area under the concentration-time curve; BU: busulfan; C0: trough concentration; CI: confidence interval; CMV: cytomegalovirus; CSA: cyclosporine; Css: Concentration at steady state; CY: cyclophosphamide; EMIT: enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique; FLU: fludarabine monophosphate; GVHD: graft-versus-host disease; HPLC: high pressure liquid chromatography; IV: intravenous(ly); LC-MS: HPLC with mass spectrometry detection; MA: myeloablative; MMF: mycophenolate mofetil; MPA: mycophenolic acid; NMA: nonmyeloablative; NRM: non-relapse mortality; PBSC: peripheral blood stem cell; PD: pharmacodynamic; PK: pharmacokinetic; PO: oral(ly); RIC: reduced intensity conditioning; TBI: total body irradiation; UCB: umbilical cord blood; URD: unrelated donor