Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Crim Justice. 2016 Sep;46:32–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.016

Table A1. Cross-sectional models from wave 1, with perceived crime and disorder as outcomes.

Crime Disorder
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Cohesion -0.116 -0.037 -0.499 ** -0.415 **
(0.108) (0.111) (0.117) (0.120)
Collective efficacy -0.343 ** -0.201 -0.371 ** -0.218
(0.088) (0.105) (0.095) (0.114)
Cohesion X collective efficacy 0.424 * 0.456 *
(0.182) (0.197)
Concentrated disadvantage -0.040 -0.062 0.014 -0.010
(0.042) (0.042) (0.045) (0.045)
Percent occupied units -0.210 -0.066 -0.446 -0.290
(0.369) (0.365) (0.399) (0.396)
Residential stability 0.114 0.216 -0.029 0.081
(0.255) (0.252) (0.276) (0.274)
Percent African American 0.230 0.243 0.204 0.219
(0.182) (0.178) (0.197) (0.193)
Percent Latino 0.495 0.543 0.204 0.256
(0.447) (0.437) (0.484) (0.474)
Racial/ethnic heterogeneity -0.033 -0.034 0.266 0.264
(0.194) (0.190) (0.210) (0.206)
Population density 0.191 ** 0.190 ** 0.095 ** 0.094 **
(0.032) (0.031) (0.034) (0.033)
Unemployment rate 0.346 0.478 -0.105 0.036
(0.556) (0.546) (0.602) (0.592)
R-square 0.567 0.586 0.621 0.639
**

p < .01 (two-tail test),

*

p < .05 (two-tail test),

p < .05 (one-tail test). Standard errors in parentheses. N = 113 block groups