Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 25;46(6):1249–1263. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002780

Table 3.

Threatening and non-threatening appraisal styles in the three experimental tasks

Cards task Telepath task VASP
Non-threatening appraisals
External – normalizing ‘It is just a simple card puzzle’ ‘It is just a simple number puzzle’ ‘It is part of the study and involves a pre-recorded voice’
Internal – normalizing ‘It is to do with natural extrasensory perception (ESP)/psychic or paranormal abilities’
‘There is a rational explanation involving basic attention/perception’
Threatening appraisals
External – personalizing ‘It is not the computer which guessed; there is someone involved in this’ ‘It was not just about the phone; there is someone behind the scenes involved’ ‘Someone was speaking to me’
External – non-personalizing ‘It works because the system is able to read people's minds’ ‘There was a spirit or some kind of entity in the room’
External – intentionalizing ‘It was done on purpose to trick me, or make me look stupid’
External – generalizing ‘It is a trick that is part of a bigger conspiracy’
Internal – non-normalizing ‘This means that something is wrong with me’

VASP, Virtual acoustic space paradigm.