Table 1.
Principles | Applied to HIV cure research | Challenges |
---|---|---|
Collaborative partnership |
Finding a cure for HIV will require the collaboration of international scientists from the private and public sectors, as well as engagement of HIV-affected communities and other stakeholders |
Public–private sector collaboration is needed |
| ||
Scientists from different specialties and geographic areas will need to work together | ||
| ||
The voices and input of those infected with and affected by HIV are critical | ||
| ||
Social value | Research directed toward an HIV cure should be organized in ways that foster scientific progress and move the science forward in useful ways. Research relevant toward finding a functional or sterilizing cure for HIV can build on the IAS road map for HIV cure research |
Preclinical and animal studies are necessary to provide a foundation for clinical trials |
| ||
All findings from HIV cure research, including negative findings, are important to disseminate |
||
| ||
Scientific validity | Each HIV cure study should be designed to provide a rigorous answer to the valuable scientific question related to curing HIV |
Stepwise and deliberate design is necessary to ensure safety and dosing and demonstrate proof of concept before wide-scale clinical trials are initiated |
| ||
Fair selection of participants |
The selection of participants and study sites must be equitable, also consistent with the imperative to protect participants and carry out a scientifically rigorous study, and guided by considerations of the equitable distribution of the benefits and burdens of HIV cure research |
Early phase studies should enroll male and female adults who can provide their own consent and who are willing to assume risk for the benefit of others. HIV cure studies will include HIV-infected persons who are stable on long-term antiretrovirals, those who are sick with HIV-associated illnesses such as lymphoma, and healthy volunteers. Studies with children and adolescents should follow with promising interventions found well tolerated in adults. Sites should be selected that have the scientific, logistical, and ethical capacity to conduct the specific trial |
| ||
Favorable risk–benefit balance |
Research risks must be minimized and acceptable in relation to the prospective benefits to study participants or of the knowledge to be generated |
In early trials, participants will assume risks without the prospect of direct benefit. Risks are uncertain and could be significant. Risks include those associated with interventions being studied, the risk of viral rebound after stopping long term antiretroviral therapy, the risks of research procedures that might be invasive, and the risk of possible long-term adverse events |
| ||
Independent review | Each study protocol should undergo coordinated scientific and ethical review, approval from appropriate ethics committees, institutional review boards, and regulatory agencies |
Multiple levels of review and oversight will be essential to assure scientifically and ethically appropriate research acceptable to relevant communities |
| ||
Informed consent | Participants should give informed and voluntary consent | Special effort should be made to assure that participants in early studies understand the potential risks and lack of direct benefit. Understanding should be carefully assessed especially because of the possible distorting influence of a desire for a cure |
| ||
Respect for enrolled participants and communities |
Individuals who accept the risks associated with finding a cure for HIV should be carefully monitored, have their rights protected, receive compensation for any research related injuries. Plans should be in place regarding how interventions found safe and effective will be available and affordable to research participants and communities |
Monitoring systems should be in place to allow rapid intervention for individuals whose virus rebounds or who suffer adverse events. Medical care should be provided for those who suffer any research related injuries. Discussions and planning for making successful interventions available should start early in the clinical trial process |