Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Feb 1;134(2):137–145. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4606

Table 3.

DCCT Treatment Effect on Overall Visual QOL using Quantile Regression

Estimated Difference In Median t value P-value
Treatment: Conventional vs. Intensive −1.0 (−1.7, −0.3) −2.76 0.0058
Gender: Female vs. Male −1.3 (−2.0, −0.6) −3.57 0.0004
Age at DCCT baseline: Per 10 year increase −0.9 (−1.3, −0.4) −3.49 0.0005
HbA1c at DCCT Eligibility Per 10% increase −0.3 (−0.5, −0.1) −2.97 0.0030
Retinopathy at DCCT baseline:
        ETDRS 20/(<)20 vs. 10/10 −0.2 (−1.1, 0.6) −0.65 0.5834
        ETDRS 35/(<)35 vs. 10/10 −0.3 (−1.4, 0.8) −0.85 0.5710
        ETDRS 43/(<)43 vs. 10/10 −2.4 (−5.6, 0.7) −1.46 0.1260