Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Curr. 2015 May 3;2(2):163–181. doi: 10.1177/2329496515579761

Table 4.

Relative Risk Ratios from Multinomial Logistic Regression Models Predicting Latent Classes of Those Who Hook Up

Utilitarian vs. Uninhibited Uninspired vs. Uninhibited Uninspired vs. Utilitarian
Female 1.52 2.93*** 1.93*
First year student 1.23 1.86* 1.52
Black .34* .48 1.40
Asian .64 .88 1.37
Hispanic/Other .61 .44 .72
Parents divorced/separated/never married 1.07 1.73 1.61
Mother has college degree .83 .83 1.00
Mother has advanced degree .52 .39* .75
Importance of religion 1.14 1.14 1.01
Self-esteem .97 1.04 1.07**
Sex outside committed relationship wrong 4.36*** 3.60 .83
Frequency of drunkenness during hookup 1.12 1.13 1.01
***

p < .001

**

p < .01

*

p < .05

p < .10

Note: Not enough cases in Class 4 (Unreflectives) for meaningful analysis. N =512.