Table 2.
Comparison of type II error rates through power analysis from 1000 MC simulations.
| Power Analysis under H0: γxy = 0, HA: γxy = 0.5 Normal error under complete data | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Method |
|||||
| Sample size | FRM (Wald) | FRM (Score) | ML | GLS | WLS |
| 50 | 0.735 | 0.647 | 0.706 | 0.697 | 0.735 |
| 100 | 0.924 | 0.899 | 0.920 | 0.920 | 0.924 |
| 500 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 | >0.999 |
| Missing data (15 %/30 % at time 2/3) with correlated repeated measures, t-distributed error terms | |||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Method |
|||
| Sample size | FRM (Wald) | FRM (Score) | ML |
| 50 | 0.350 | 0.204 | 0.264 |
| 100 | 0.511 | 0.363 | 0.458 |
| 500 | 0.938 | 0.915 | 0.985 |