Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;6(6):341–351. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1103425

Comparative analysis of isolates screened for potential probiotic properties

Isolate ID Source GI transit profile Bacteriocin activity Caco-2 adherence
L. rhamnosus 141 L1 Fecal Does not survive acid, tolerates bile, intestinal conditions Against Lactobacillus Lower than standard
L. rhamnosus 156 L1 Fecal Does not survive acid, tolerates bile, intestinal conditions None Lower than standard
L. rhamnosus 153 LT1 Fecal Does not survive acid, tolerates bile, intestinal conditions None Comparable to standard
L. rhamnosus 321 L3 Fecal Does not survive acid, tolerates bile, intestinal conditions None Lower than standard
E. casseliflavus 153 R3 Fecal Does not tolerate acid, survives bile and intestinal conditions None Greater than standard
E. casseliflavus 153 R4 Fecal Does not tolerate acid, survives bile and intestinal conditions None Greater than standard
E. faecalis 141 R4 Isolate match Does not tolerate acid, survives bile and intestinal conditions Against Vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE) Lower than standard

Pathogens tested: Listeria monocytogenes, E. coli 0157:H7, MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella Typhimurium, Shigella boydii, Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus pyogenes.