Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 4;6(6):341–351. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1103425

Table 4.

Comparative analysis of isolates screened for potential probiotic properties

Isolate ID Source GI transit profile Antimicrobial activity Caco-2 adherence
Bifidobacterium boum (breve) 396 B1 Fecal Not tested None Lower than standard
Bifidobacterium longum subsp infantis (breve) 159 B1 Isolate match Not tested None Poor
L. crispatus 330 L1 Fecal Limited acid tolerance, good tolerance of bile and intestinal conditions Acid - Against  
Listeria, E. coli Greater than standard        
L. fermentum 297 R1 Fecal Limited acid tolerance, good tolerance of bile and intestinal conditions Acid Not tested
L. fermentum [NOT IN LIST OF UNIQUE ISOLATES] 289 LT2 Isolate match Limited acid tolerance, good tolerance of bile and intestinal conditions Acid Not tested
L. gasseri 147 LT2 Isolate match Tolerates acid but not bile and intestinal pH Acid Against MRSA, Listeria, E. coli, Salmonella Greater than standard
L. gasseri 291 R3 Isolate match Tolerates acid but not bile and intestinal pH Acid Against L. delbrueckii,  
E. Coli Lower than standard        
L. gasseri 312 LT4 Fecal Tolerates acid but not bile and intestinal pH Acid Against MRSA, Listeria, E. coli, Salmonella Greater than standard
L. gasseri 163 L1 Milk Limited acid tolerance, fair survival in bile and intestinal pH Acid Against E. coli, Salmonella Lower than standard
L. gasseri 163 R1 Milk Acid tolerance, fair survival in bile and intestinal pH None Lower than standard