Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 14;31:79–88. doi: 10.1007/s12928-015-0349-x

Table 2.

Comparisons of phantom mean lumen diameter (LD) by OFDI and FD-OCT in various conditions

OFDI FD-OCT
Saline Saline 50 %, contrast 50 % Contrast % change Saline Saline 50 %, contrast 50 % Contrast % change
5.04 mm 5.08 ± 0.01 5.08 ± 0.01 5.05 ± 0.01 0.59 5.04 ± 0.01 5.03 ± 0.01 5.03 ± 0.01 0.20
4.04 mm 4.07 ± 0.01 4.07 ± 0.01 4.05 ± 0.01 0.49 4.05 ± 0.01 4.06 ± 0.02 4.04 ± 0.01 0.49
3.04 mm 3.06 ± 0.01 3.06 ± 0.01 3.07 ± 0.01 0.33 3.07 ± 0.01 3.08 ± 0.01 3.06 ± 0.01 0.65
2.03 mm 2.06 ± 0.01 2.05 ± 0.01 2.07 ± 0.01 0.97 2.04 ± 0.01 2.08 ± 0.01 2.04 ± 0.01 1.96
1.51 mm 1.51 ± 0.01 1.52 ± 0.01 1.53 ± 0.00 1.32 1.49 ± 0.01 1.53 ± 0.01 1.48 ± 0.01 3.36

% change was calculated as follows: 100*(maximum mean LD − minimum mean LD among three flushing media)/mean LD in saline

FD-OCT frequency domain optical coherence tomography, LD lumen diameter, OFDI optical frequency domain imaging