Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 2;62(9):1081–1088. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw035

Table 3.

Sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF Assay Versus 2 or 3 Acid-Fast Bacilli Smears for Identification of US Culture-Confirmed Tuberculosis Cases

Smear AFB Positive 1 Xpert Positive Results P Value 2 Xpert Results, at Least 1 Positive P Value
2 AFB smears (n = 91a)
 All 68.1%b (62/91)
[58.0%–76.8%]
85.2% (75/88)c
[76.3%–91.2%]
.001 91.1% (82/90)d
[83.4%–95.4%]
<.001
 AFB positive 96.7% (59/61)d
[88.8%–99.1%]
100% (62/62)
[94.2%–100%]
 AFB negative 59.3% (16/27)e
[40.7%–75.5%]
71.4% (20/28)d
[52.9%–84.7%]
3 AFB smears (n = 53)
 All 60.4% (32/53)f
[46.9%–71.4%]
82.0% (41/50)c
[69.2%–90.2%]
.006 88.5% (46/52)d
[77.0%–94.6%]
<.001
 AFB positive 96.8% (30/31)d
[83.8%–99.4%]
100% (32/32)
[89.3%–100%]
 AFB negative 57.9% (11/19)e
[36.3%–76.9%]
70.0% (14/20)d
[48.1%–85.5%]

Data are presented as % (no./No.) [95% confidence interval]. P values are for comparison of AFB smear vs Xpert assay, using Fisher exact test.

Abbreviation: AFB, acid-fast bacilli.

a One missing Xpert due to site/laboratory error.

b AFB+ in 61 of 88 (69.3%) for 1 Xpert assay comparison and 62 of 90 (68.9%) for 2 Xpert assays comparison.

c Three invalid Xpert assays.

d One invalid Xpert assay.

e Two invalid Xpert assays.

f AFB+ in 31 of 50 (62.0%) for 1 Xpert assay comparison and 32 of 52 (61.5%) for 2 Xpert assays comparison.