Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):299–311. doi: 10.1002/art.39501

Table 3.

The table describes ranking of the 16 core items by scleroderma experts and results of the cluster analysis

Core item Rank 1 (%) Rank 2 (%) Rank 3 (%) Cluster
MRSS 374 (44.1%) 131 (15.5%) 75 (8.9%) 1
FVC%
predicted
123 (14.5%) 148 (17.5%) 72 (8.5%) 1
Physician
global
assessment
77 (9.1%) 116 (13.7%) 88 (10.4%) 1
Patient global
assessment
93 (11%) 69 (8.2%) 115 (13.6%) 1
HAQ-DI 68 (8%) 112 (13.2%) 99 (11.7%) 1
Vitality SF-36 12 (1.4%) 37 (4.4%) 101 (11.9%) 2
GI VAS 25 (2.9%) 44 (5.2%) 43 (5.1%) 2
Pain 11 (1.3%) 38 (4.5%) 82 (9.7%) 2
Tendon
friction rubs
11 (1.3%) 33 (3.9%) 23 (2.7%) 2
Breathing
VAS
13 (1.5%) 25 (3%) 32 (3.8%) 2
Digital ulcers
VAS
7 (0.8%) 38 (4.5%) 17 (2%) 2
Raynaud’s
VAS
11 (1.3%) 18 (2.1%) 43 (5.1%) 2
Patient skin
interference
last month
2 (0.2%) 21 (2.5%) 22 (2.6%) 2
Number of
digital ulcers
9 (1.1%) 11 (1.3%) 17 (2%) 2
Presence of
renal crisis
11 (1.3%) 3 (0.4%) 2 (0.2%) 2
Body mass
index
1 (0.1%) 3 (0.4%) 15 (1.8%) 2

MRSS= modified Rodnan skin score, FVC= Forced vital capacity, HAQ-DI= health assessment questionnaire-disability index, GI= gastrointestinal, VAS= visual analog scale, MRSS= modified Rodnan skin score