Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2016 May;20(5):1084–1096. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1209-5

Table 1.

Study instruments and measures of reliability and descriptive statistics

# items Alpha coefficient n Mean (SD) (%) Median [Min, max]
HIV Knowledge [49, 50] (% correct out of 45) 45 0.875a 193 73.5 (15.6) 75.6 [4.4, 100.0]
CESD depression [51] 20 0.899 193 16.7 (11.8) 13.0 [0, 48.0]
Personal stigma [52] 24 0.869 190 46.0 (10.5) 47.5 [24.0, 76.0]
Spiritual wellbeing (EWB) [53, 54] 10 0.812 188 46.3 (8.2) 46.0 [20.0, 60.0]
Spiritual wellbeing (RWB) [53, 54] 10 0.838 188 51.6 (7.9) 54.0 [22.0, 60.0]
Spiritual wellbeing (SWB) [53, 54] 20 0.885 189 97.4 (15.4) 98.0 [40.0, 120.0]
Difficult life circumstances [55] 33 0.789 192 8.4 (4.5) 8.0 [0.0, 22.0]
PRQ social support [56] 25 0.903 189 134.6 (22.9) 138.0 [45.0, 175.0]
PSQIII total satisfaction [57, 58] 50 0.935 191 193.5 (30.0) 198.0 [87.2, 250.0]
HIV self-management 22 0.809 191 71.8 (10.3) 74.0 [38.0, 88.0]
Brief RCOPE—positive [59, 60] (≤18 vs >18) 7 0.920 191 17.3 (4.2) 19.0 [3.0, 21.0]
(% scored >18) 99 51.8 %
Brief RCOPE—negative [59, 60] (≤2 vs >2) 7 0.847 180 4.0 (4.5) 3.0 [0.0, 21.0]
(% scored >2) 93 51.7 %
Condom self-efficacyb [47] 34 0.949 154 4.0 (0.7) 4.0 [1.6, 5.0]
HIV medication self efficacy [48] 19 0.860 192 164.2 (22.9) 169.0 [67.0, 190.0]
Outcome expectancy for HIV adherence [48] 22 0.910 192 86.2 (14.0) 86.0 [30.0, 110.0]
Condom outcome expectancy [47]
    Partner reaction 7 0.808 187 26.8 (5.3) 27.0 [11.0, 35.0]
    Physical hedonism 5 0.821 192 17.8 (4.1) 18.0 [6.0, 25.0]
    Positive self evaluation (≤30 vs >30) 7 0.882 190 29.9 (4.9) 31.0 [11.0, 35.0]
(% scored >30) 96 50.5 %
    Prevention efficacy (<10 vs =10) 2 0.750 192 8.7 (1.8) 9.5 [2.0, 10.0]
(% score =10) 96 50.0 %
    Social approval (≤ 15 vs >15) 4 0.923 173 16.6 (3.6) 16.0 [4.0, 20.0]
(% scored >15) 140 80.9 %
    Negative self evaluation (≤11 vs >11) 3 0.828 189 11.6 (3.0) 12.0 [3.0, 15.0]
(% scored >11) 115 60.8 %
Multidimensional desire for control [61]
    Internal 7 0.813 190 18.8 (7.7) 19.0 [7.0, 35.0]
    External (≤ 24 vs >24) 6 0.813 190 23.6 (6.1) 25.0 [6.0, 30.0]
(% scored >24) 100 52.6 %
    Shared (<20 vs =20) 4 0.873 192 17.9 (3.8) 20.0 [4.0, 20.0]
(% score =20) 110 57.3 %
Safer sex motivation [43, 44]
    Internal (<91 vs =91) 13 0.860 188 86.1 (8.9) 90.0 [25.0, 91.0]
(% score =91) 86 45.7 %
    External 10 0.901 187 45.3 (17.9) 46.0 [10.0, 70.0]
HIV adherence motivation [43, 44]
    Internal (≤84 vs =84) 12 0.759 193 78.8 (7.5) 82.0 [44.0, 84.0]
(% score =84) 76 39.4 %
    External 13 0.889 193 53.8 (21.0) 55.0 [13.0, 91.0]
HIV status disclosure to main partner
    No, don’t know, refused to answer, not applicable or missingc 64 (33.2 %)
    Yes 129 (66.8 %)

Cα is Chronbach’s alpha reliability

a

Cα reported for HIV Knowledge is the Kuder-Richardon-20 (KR-20) statistics since the knowledge items are dichotomously scored (correct/ incorrect)

b

39 subjects did not respond completely to the Condom Self-Efficacy instrument

c

Only 1 subject did not respond to the HIV Status Disclosure question