Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Soc Behav. 2015 Aug 14;56(3):378–397. doi: 10.1177/0022146515596353

Table 1:

Summary of the three cases. Acronyms and specialist terminology pertaining to the English system are emboldened.

Aim Host Professional
leadership
Clinical
setting
(Sub)professional
groups affected
Approach and methodologies to
improvement
Clinical, policy and organizational context
Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project (ILCOP)
To improve quality of care and outcomes for patients with lung cancer Royal College of Physicians of London Respiratory physicians Multi-disciplinary teams in hospitals Respiratory physicians; nurse specialists; oncologists; surgeons; clinical pathologists; radiologists Supporting teams to develop ideas for improvement in areas of deficient practice through: analysis and feedback of performance data from a national audit; reciprocal face-to-face peer review processes; development of quality-improvement plans; national meetings Cancer care dominated by top-down national directives, though lung seen as a ‘Cinderella’ cancer, relatively neglected. National Cancer Action Team (NCAT) runs audit-based peer review and performance management (Burnett et al. 2007)

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Quality Improvement Project (AAA-QIP)
To reduce peri-operative mortality in elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland Vascular surgeons Multi- disciplinary teams predominantly in hospitals Vascular surgeons; anesthetists; interventional radiologists; nurse specialists Supporting the implementation of an evidence- / consensus-based care pathway through: regional meetings to discuss, adapt, and reach consensus on proposed pathways; regional leads working with participating hospitals to implement pathways; increasing data input into a national audit database; analysis and feedback of performance data Ongoing rationalization of surgery due to (contested) association between volume of cases and outcomes (Earnshaw and Hamilton 2007); provision being reviewed by commissioners(regional purchasers of care for a population) accordingly; new screening program also supports rationalization. Other surgical specialties subject to publication of outcome data

ENABLE-Chronic Kidney Disease (ENABLE)
To achieve better quality of care and quality of life for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Kidney Research UK Nurses; renal physicians General practices (family physicians’ offices) General practitioners (family physicians) (GPs); primary care nurses; pharmacists Supporting the implementation of evidence- / consensus-based care bundles to improve the management of CKD, with a particular focus on indicators included in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), a payment-for-performance scheme for GPs, through: training in disease management for staff; self- management training for patients Primary care practice increasingly dominated by incentives of QOF system (McDonald et al. 2007).