Table 1:
Aim | Host | Professional leadership |
Clinical setting |
(Sub)professional groups affected |
Approach and methodologies to improvement |
Clinical, policy and organizational context |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Improving Lung Cancer Outcomes Project (ILCOP) | ||||||
To improve quality of care and outcomes for patients with lung cancer | Royal College of Physicians of London | Respiratory physicians | Multi-disciplinary teams in hospitals | Respiratory physicians; nurse specialists; oncologists; surgeons; clinical pathologists; radiologists | Supporting teams to develop ideas for improvement in areas of deficient practice through: analysis and feedback of performance data from a national audit; reciprocal face-to-face peer review processes; development of quality-improvement plans; national meetings | Cancer care dominated by top-down national directives, though lung seen as a ‘Cinderella’ cancer, relatively neglected. National Cancer Action Team (NCAT) runs audit-based peer review and performance management (Burnett et al. 2007) |
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Quality Improvement Project (AAA-QIP) | ||||||
To reduce peri-operative mortality in elective surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm | Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland | Vascular surgeons | Multi- disciplinary teams predominantly in hospitals | Vascular surgeons; anesthetists; interventional radiologists; nurse specialists | Supporting the implementation of an evidence- / consensus-based care pathway through: regional meetings to discuss, adapt, and reach consensus on proposed pathways; regional leads working with participating hospitals to implement pathways; increasing data input into a national audit database; analysis and feedback of performance data | Ongoing rationalization of surgery due to (contested) association between volume of cases and outcomes (Earnshaw and Hamilton 2007); provision being reviewed by commissioners(regional purchasers of care for a population) accordingly; new screening program also supports rationalization. Other surgical specialties subject to publication of outcome data |
ENABLE-Chronic Kidney Disease (ENABLE) | ||||||
To achieve better quality of care and quality of life for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. | Kidney Research UK | Nurses; renal physicians | General practices (family physicians’ offices) | General practitioners (family physicians) (GPs); primary care nurses; pharmacists | Supporting the implementation of evidence- / consensus-based care bundles to improve the management of CKD, with a particular focus on indicators included in the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), a payment-for-performance scheme for GPs, through: training in disease management for staff; self- management training for patients | Primary care practice increasingly dominated by incentives of QOF system (McDonald et al. 2007). |