Table 3.
Proportion of agreement and disagreement in complexity scoring for each pair of readers. For example, urologist 1 and the radiologist agreed on the complexity score for 68% of patients, 28% of patients were scored as 3S by both readers, and 3% were scored as 3S by the radiologist and 3H by the urologist
| Radiologist | Urologist 1 | Urologist 2 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3S | 3H | 1 | 2 | 3S | 3H | 1 | 2 | 3S | 3H | ||
| Urologist 1 | 1 | 4% | 3% | 0% | 1% | ||||||||
| 2 | 3% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |||||||||
| 3S | 0% | 4% | 28% | 9% | |||||||||
| 3H | 0% | 1% | 3% | 8% | |||||||||
| Total Agreement | 68% | ||||||||||||
| Urologist 2 | 1 | 6% | 4% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 6% | 0% | 0% | ||||
| 2 | 2% | 21% | 8% | 0% | 3% | 22% | 6% | 0% | |||||
| 3S | 0% | 7% | 27% | 9% | 1% | 7% | 33% | 2% | |||||
| 3H | 0% | 2% | 3% | 11% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 10% | |||||
| Total Agreement | 65% | Total Agreement | 70% | ||||||||||
| Radiologist In-Training | 1 | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 6% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 | 4% | 26% | 7% | 1% | 4% | 28% | 5% | 0% | 4% | 23% | 8% | 3% | |
| 3S | 0% | 4% | 27% | 5% | 0% | 6% | 29% | 1% | 0% | 6% | 28% | 2% | |
| 3H | 0% | 1% | 4% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 11% | 0% | 1% | 7% | 11% | |
| Total Agreement | 70% | Total Agreement | 73% | Total Agreement | 68% | ||||||||