Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Chemosphere. 2016 Feb 6;149:190–201. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.056

Table 6.

Multiple regressions for follicular phase length were computed against potential confounders (Model 1) and also against the contaminant principal component (PC) analysis scores (Model 2). The regression coefficient (B) is the coefficient of the slope for predictor variables. The PC scores used in Model 2 are generated from organohalogens and elements detectable in ≥70 % of the sample population. * Regression coefficient slope B and model are significant (p< 0.05).

Follicular Phase Length
Regression Coefficient (B) t-statistic p-value1
 Model 1 Mean Raw1 (95% C.I.) Standardized
Constant 22.06 (14.36—30.08) 5.957 0.001*
Age (y) −0.21 (−0.37—−0.04) −0.459 −2.487 0.025*
Alcohol (Y/N) 0.37 (−2.66—3.06) 0.058 0.299 0.819
Caffeine (Y/N) −1.14 (−3.26—2.23) −0.149 −0.842 0.375
Model 1 significance: F = 2.984, p = 0.049*; r2 = 0.249.
Model 2
Constant −79.33 (−321.95—373.20) 5.369 0.677
Age (y) −0.28 (−0.46—−0.01) −0.611 −2.700 0.022*
Alcohol (Y/N) 0.35 (−2.38—3.51) 0.055 0.291 0.797
Caffeine (Y/N) 0.39 (−2.96—3.11) 0.051 0.256 0.791
PC-1 1.32 (−0.62—2.77) 0.432 2.355 0.113
PC-2 −0.04 (−1.02—1.09) −0.012 −0.075 0.941
PC-3 −0.78 (−2.30—0.24) −0.255 −1.466 0.229
PC-4 0.07 (−1.37—1.05) 0.023 0.126 0.901
PC-5 −0.24 (−1.69—0.84) −0.079 −0.488 0.642
PC-6 0.68 (−0.61—1.56) 0.224 1.222 0.205
Model 2 improvement over Model 1: F ratio change = 1.692; p = 0.172; r2 = 0.494.
1

results from Bootstrap procedure, n=1000 samples.